Neuroanatomical morphometric characterization of sex differences in youth using statistical learning

&NA; Exploring neuroanatomical sex differences using a multivariate statistical learning approach can yield insights that cannot be derived with univariate analysis. While gross differences in total brain volume are well‐established, uncovering the more subtle, regional sex‐related differences in neuroanatomy requires a multivariate approach that can accurately model spatial complexity as well as the interactions between neuroanatomical features. Here, we developed a multivariate statistical learning model using a support vector machine (SVM) classifier to predict sex from MRI‐derived regional neuroanatomical features from a single‐site study of 967 healthy youth from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC). Then, we validated the multivariate model on an independent dataset of 682 healthy youth from the multi‐site Pediatric Imaging, Neurocognition and Genetics (PING) cohort study. The trained model exhibited an 83% cross‐validated prediction accuracy, and correctly predicted the sex of 77% of the subjects from the independent multi‐site dataset. Results showed that cortical thickness of the middle occipital lobes and the angular gyri are major predictors of sex. Results also demonstrated the inferential benefits of going beyond classical regression approaches to capture the interactions among brain features in order to better characterize sex differences in male and female youths. We also identified specific cortical morphological measures and parcellation techniques, such as cortical thickness as derived from the Destrieux atlas, that are better able to discriminate between males and females in comparison to other brain atlases (Desikan‐Killiany, Brodmann and subcortical atlases). Graphical abstract Visualization of neuroanatomical differences of sex by combining the following three statistical values: correlation of the neuroanatomical features with brain size as assessed by estimating Spearman's correlation with estimated total intracranial volume (x‐axis), sex‐related discriminatory indices derived from the SVM model (y‐axis), and the univariate sex‐related differences obtained from the GLM analysis (radius of spheres = negative log of the p‐value). PLS: Paracentral lobule and sulcus, aMCC: middle‐anterior part of the cingulate cortex, mOG: medial occipital gyrus, AG: angular gyrus, PP: Planum polare of the superior temporal gyrus, sPL: superior parietal lobe, WM: white matter hemisphere. Superscripts refers to left (L), right (R) hemispheres. Interactive version of the plot is presented online on the Plotly website (https://plot.ly/˜sepehrband/50/neuroanatomy‐of‐sex‐difference/). Figure. No caption available. HighlightsNeuroanatomical sex differences in youth is modeled using a statistical learning approach.Results indicate the advantageous of multivariate analysis over univariate analysis.Cortical thickness and mean curvature measures revealed sex differences that were unrelated to brain size.Most discriminative brain areas were angular and occipital gyri and paracentral lobule.The source code for the analysis performed in this study has been made available.

[1]  Wenli Ma,et al.  The human hippocampus is not sexually-dimorphic: Meta-analysis of structural MRI volumes , 2016, NeuroImage.

[2]  Yufeng Zang,et al.  Combined structural and resting-state functional MRI analysis of sexual dimorphism in the young adult human brain: An MVPA approach , 2012, NeuroImage.

[3]  Richard A. Lippa,et al.  Joel et al.'s method systematically fails to detect large, consistent sex differences , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Andreas Christmann,et al.  Support vector machines , 2008, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook.

[5]  Frederick R. Forst,et al.  On robust estimation of the location parameter , 1980 .

[6]  A. Arnold,et al.  Sex differences in mouse cortical thickness are independent of the complement of sex chromosomes , 2003, Neuroscience.

[7]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex , 2016, Nature.

[8]  Mark E. Bastin,et al.  Sex differences in the adult human brain: Evidence from 5,216 UK Biobank participants , 2017 .

[9]  A. Fotopoulou,et al.  Affective touch and attachment style modulate pain: a laser-evoked potentials study , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Why voxel-based morphometric analysis should be used with great caution when characterizing group differences , 2004, NeuroImage.

[11]  A. Atiya,et al.  Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[12]  Eileen Luders,et al.  Decoding gender dimorphism of the human brain using multimodal anatomical and diffusion MRI data , 2013, NeuroImage.

[13]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[14]  D. Frayer SEXUAL DIMORPHISM , 2005 .

[15]  Avshalom Caspi,et al.  Using sex differences in psychopathology to study causal mechanisms: unifying issues and research strategies. , 2003, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[16]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Registration based cortical thickness measurement , 2009, NeuroImage.

[17]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Sex differences and the impact of steroid hormones on the developing human brain. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  N. Makris,et al.  Normal sexual dimorphism of the adult human brain assessed by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  D. Wendler,et al.  Problems with the consensus definition of the therapeutic misconception. , 2013, The Journal of clinical ethics.

[20]  Janaina Mourão Miranda,et al.  Investigating the predictive value of whole-brain structural MR scans in autism: A pattern classification approach , 2010, NeuroImage.

[21]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  Rebecca C. Knickmeyer,et al.  Why Are Autism Spectrum Conditions More Prevalent in Males? , 2011, PLoS biology.

[23]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[24]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Human brain mapping: A systematic comparison of parcellation methods for the human cerebral cortex , 2017, NeuroImage.

[25]  Ludwig Kappos,et al.  Multivariate pattern classification of gray matter pathology in multiple sclerosis , 2012, NeuroImage.

[26]  R. Gur,et al.  Establishing a link between sex-related differences in the structural connectome and behaviour , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  Efstathios D. Gennatas,et al.  Linked Sex Differences in Cognition and Functional Connectivity in Youth. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  P. J. Huber Robust Estimation of a Location Parameter , 1964 .

[29]  K. Brodmann Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Großhirnrinde : in ihren Prinzipien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues , 1985 .

[30]  Rebecca C. Knickmeyer,et al.  Sex Differences in the Brain: Implications for Explaining Autism , 2005, Science.

[31]  B. Ripley,et al.  Robust Statistics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Geosciences.

[32]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  Effi cient , distributed and interactive neuroimaging data analysis using the LONI Pipeline , 2009 .

[33]  D. Stott Parker,et al.  Neuroimaging Study Designs, Computational Analyses and Data Provenance Using the LONI Pipeline , 2010, PloS one.

[34]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Neuroimaging of the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort , 2014, NeuroImage.

[35]  I Pete,et al.  [Investigating the predictive value of RMI and ROMA indices in patients with ovarian tumors of uncertain dignity]. , 2016, Magyar onkologia.

[36]  M. Rajadhyaksha,et al.  Confocal imaging-guided laser ablation of basal cell carcinomas: an ex vivo study. , 2015, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[37]  Yevgenia Kozorovitskiy,et al.  Experience induces structural and biochemical changes in the adult primate brain. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  J. R. Koehler,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus. , 1996 .

[39]  Mark A. Elliott,et al.  The Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort: A publicly available resource for the study of normal and abnormal brain development in youth , 2016, NeuroImage.

[40]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  J. Conte,et al.  A Critical Analysis , 1969 .

[42]  A. Dale,et al.  Whole Brain Segmentation Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[43]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Learning with Kernels: support vector machines, regularization, optimization, and beyond , 2001, Adaptive computation and machine learning series.

[44]  Elena Choleris,et al.  Sex, hormones, and genotype interact to influence psychiatric disease, treatment, and behavioral research , 2017, Journal of neuroscience research.

[45]  L. Cahill Why sex matters for neuroscience , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[46]  Sean R Eddy,et al.  What is dynamic programming? , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[47]  Jonathan D. Rosenblatt Multivariate revisit to “sex beyond the genitalia” , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Nancy C Andreasen,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in the human brain: evaluation of tissue volume, tissue composition and surface anatomy using magnetic resonance imaging , 2000, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[49]  Emily J. Ward,et al.  Patterns in the human brain mosaic discriminate males from females , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  R. Woods,et al.  Sex differences in cortical thickness mapped in 176 healthy individuals between 7 and 87 years of age. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[51]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  Big biomedical data as the key resource for discovery science , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[52]  Søren Dalsgaard,et al.  Influence of gender on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Europe – ADORE , 2006, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

[53]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 1992 .

[54]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[55]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  Next Generation Sequence Analysis and Computational Genomics Using Graphical Pipeline Workflows , 2012, Genes.

[56]  G. Breukelen Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) , 2010 .

[57]  Peter de Jonge,et al.  Gender differences in major depressive disorder: results from the Netherlands study of depression and anxiety. , 2014, Journal of affective disorders.

[58]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Estimating the Support of a High-Dimensional Distribution , 2001, Neural Computation.

[59]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews a Meta-analysis of Sex Differences in Human Brain Structure , 2022 .

[60]  Ruben C. Gur,et al.  Sex differences in brain and behavior in adolescence: Findings from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort , 2016, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[61]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  Sex beyond the genitalia: The human brain mosaic , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  M. Hines,et al.  Sex-related variation in human behavior and the brain , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[63]  Joseph M. Andreano,et al.  Sex influences on the neurobiology of learning and memory. , 2009, Learning & memory.

[64]  Alex R. Smith,et al.  Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[65]  Aikaterini Fotopoulou,et al.  Affective touch and attachment style modulate pain , 2016 .

[66]  Arno Klein,et al.  Large-scale evaluation of ANTs and FreeSurfer cortical thickness measurements , 2014, NeuroImage.

[67]  Self-Concept Variables Sex Differences in , 2016 .

[68]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[69]  Shadia Mikhael,et al.  A critical analysis of neuroanatomical software protocols reveals clinically relevant differences in parcellation schemes , 2017, NeuroImage.

[70]  Terje Manger,et al.  Oppositional Defiant Disorder—Gender Differences in Co-occurring Symptoms of Mental Health Problems in a General Population of Children , 2011, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[71]  C. Neill Epperson,et al.  Sex differences in anxiety and depression clinical perspectives , 2014, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology.

[72]  J. Platt Sequential Minimal Optimization : A Fast Algorithm for Training Support Vector Machines , 1998 .

[73]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Structural Neuroimaging Genetics Interactions in Alzheimer's Disease. , 2015, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[74]  E. Crone,et al.  Sex differences and structural brain maturation from childhood to early adulthood , 2013, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[75]  Mark E Bastin,et al.  Sex Differences in the Adult Human Brain: Evidence from 5216 UK Biobank Participants , 2017, bioRxiv.

[76]  Dhruv Marwha,et al.  Meta-analysis reveals a lack of sexual dimorphism in human amygdala volume , 2017, NeuroImage.

[77]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature , 2010, NeuroImage.

[78]  Jagath C. Rajapakse,et al.  Sexual dimorphism of the developing human brain , 1997, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[79]  J. Zubieta,et al.  Sex differences in anterior cingulate cortex activation during impulse inhibition and behavioral correlates , 2012, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[80]  T. Jernigan,et al.  Development of cortical and subcortical brain structures in childhood and adolescence: a structural MRI study , 2002, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[81]  B. Turetsky,et al.  Sex Differences in Brain Gray and White Matter in Healthy Young Adults: Correlations with Cognitive Performance , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.