Understanding the relationships between information architectures and business models: An empirical study on the success configurations of smart communities

Abstract With the development of Internet of Things (IoT) and big data, many smart city and smart community projects bloomed in recent years. Following the two approaches of smart city development from Kuk and Janssen (2011), the study proposed a synergetic framework for understanding the relationship between information architectures and business models. Since community is a basic unit of a city, the development goals of a smart city are needed to be implemented at the level of communities. The development path of smart community is a configuration set including both information architecture factors and business model patterns. Based on the cases of 69 communities from Beijing, China, we explored successful configurations based on the framework. Using the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) method, we found that a successful smart community depends on the integration between information architectures and business models, and different business models rely on different information architectures elements. Networking, terminals, and sensors are key information architecture elements that are used more frequently in business models.

[1]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Redesigning social inquiry , 2008 .

[2]  Robert B. Johnston,et al.  The Use of an Explicitly Theory-Driven Data Coding Method for High-Level Theory Testing in IOIS , 2008, ICIS.

[3]  P. Schicker,et al.  The Virtual Terminal Definition , 1978, Comput. Networks.

[4]  Zhang Na.  Key Issues of Smart City Development in China: An Empirical Study , 2015 .

[5]  Cheonshik Kim,et al.  Product Control System Using RFID Tag Information and Data Mining , 2006, ICUCT.

[6]  Silvia Giordano,et al.  Modelling the smart city performance , 2012 .

[7]  Maged N. Kamel Boulos,et al.  On the Internet of Things, smart cities and the WHO Healthy Cities , 2014, International Journal of Health Geographics.

[8]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[9]  Raquel Pérez-delHoyo,et al.  A Comprehensive System for Monitoring Urban Accessibility in Smart Cities , 2017, Sensors.

[10]  Benoît Rihoux,et al.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) As an Approach , 2009 .

[11]  Rafael Pous,et al.  Using Augmented Reality and Internet of Things to improve accessibility of people with motor disabilities in the context of Smart Cities , 2017, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[12]  John Hogan,et al.  Enabling integrated city operations , 2011, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[13]  R. Hollands.  Will the real smart city please stand up? , 2008, The Routledge Companion to Smart Cities.

[14]  B. Jones.  Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice, and Public Policy , 1994 .

[15]  Max Parasol,et al.  The impact of China's 2016 Cyber Security Law on foreign technology firms, and on China's big data and Smart City dreams , 2017, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[16]  David M. Gann,et al.  Physical-digital integration in city infrastructure , 2011, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[17]  Luis Muñoz,et al.  Business model analysis of public services operating in the smart city ecosystem: The case of SmartSantander , 2017, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[18]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Smart cities in the innovation age , 2012 .

[19]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[20]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis , 2012 .

[21]  Hsiaoping Yeh,et al.  The effects of successful ICT-based smart city services: From citizens' perspectives , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  A. Mahizhnan.  Smart cities: The Singapore case , 1999 .

[23]  Jan Markendahl,et al.  Business Development in the Internet of Things: A Matter of Vertical Cooperation , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[24]  Tian-Shyug Lee,et al.  Mapping the intellectual structure of the Internet of Things (IoT) field (2000–2014): a co-word analysis , 2015, Scientometrics.

[25]  Andrea Zanella,et al.  Internet of Things for Smart Cities , 2014, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[26]  Weijie Wang,et al.  Exploring the Determinants of Network Effectiveness: The Case of Neighborhood Governance Networks in Beijing , 2016 .

[27]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Fuzzy-Set Social Science , 2001 .

[28]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  What makes a city smart? Identifying core components and proposing an integrative and comprehensive conceptualization , 2015, Inf. Polity.

[29]  Renata Paola Dameri,et al.  Understanding smart cities as a glocal strategy: A comparison between Italy and China , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[30]  Han Woo Park,et al.  Dynamic capabilities of a smart city: An innovative approach to discovering urban problems and solutions , 2018, Gov. Inf. Q..

[31]  Peer C. Fiss.  Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research , 2011 .

[32]  Nor Badrul Anuar,et al.  The role of big data in smart city , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[33]  G. Kuk,et al.  The Business Models and Information Architectures of Smart Cities , 2011 .

[34]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  A survey of Web-based business models for e-government in the Netherlands , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[35]  Remco M. Dijkman,et al.  Business models for the Internet of Things , 2015, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[36]  Hyejung Lee,et al.  Developing and validating a citizen-centric typology for smart city services , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[37]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Smart Cities in Europe , 2011 .

[38]  Eva Thomann,et al.  Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Approaches, Challenges, and Tools , 2020 .

[39]  Chengming Li,et al.  Smart City: A Shareable Framework and Its Applications in China , 2019, Sustainability.

[40]  Liyin Shen,et al.  A holistic evaluation of smart city performance in the context of China , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.