Classification of Ground Clutter and Anomalous Propagation Using Dual-Polarization Weather Radar

This paper presents the results of a study designed to classify weather radar clutter echoes obtained from ground-based dual-polarization weather radar systems. The clutter signals are due to ground clutter, sea clutter, and anomalous propagation echoes, which represent sources of error in quantitative radar rainfall estimation. Fuzzy and Bayes classifiers are evaluated as an alternative approach to traditional polarimetric-based methods. Both systems were trained and validated by using C-band dual- polarization radar measurements, and a novel technique is proposed to calculate the texture function to mitigate against the edge effects at the boundaries of precipitation regions. A methodology is presented to extract the membership functions and conditional probability density functions to train the classifiers. The critical success index indicates that the Bayes classifier has, on average, a slightly better performance than the fuzzy classifiers. However, when optimal weighting was applied, the fuzzy classifier gave one of the best performances. The classifiers are sufficiently robust to be used when only single-polarization radar measurements are available.

[1]  Chris G. Collier,et al.  Observations of sea clutter using an S‐band weather radar , 1998 .

[2]  D. Zrnic,et al.  Doppler Radar and Weather Observations , 1984 .

[3]  I. Jeff Caylor,et al.  Polarisation Radar Estimates of Rainfall: Correction of Errors Due to the Bright Band and to Anomalous Propagation , 1992 .

[4]  K A Browning,et al.  Meteorological applications of radar , 1978 .

[5]  Jonathan Lawry,et al.  Classification of Weather Radar Images using Linguistic Decision Trees with Conditional Labelling , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems Conference.

[6]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  Polarimetric Doppler Weather Radar: Principles and Applications , 2001 .

[7]  Alexander V. Ryzhkov,et al.  Polarimetric Rainfall Estimation in the Presence of Anomalous Propagation , 1998 .

[8]  J. Schaefer.  The critical success index as an indicator of Warning skill , 1990 .

[9]  A. Ryzhkov,et al.  Polarimetry for Weather Surveillance Radars , 1999 .

[10]  Chris G. Collier,et al.  Applications of weather radar systems: A guide to uses of radar data in meteorology and hydrology , 1989 .

[11]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  Classification of Hydrometeors Based on Polarimetric Radar Measurements: Development of Fuzzy Logic and Neuro-Fuzzy Systems, and In Situ Verification , 2000 .

[12]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  Hydrometeor classification system using dual-polarization radar measurements: model improvements and in situ verification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Jerry M. Straka,et al.  Testing a Procedure for Automatic Classification of Hydrometeor Types , 2001 .

[14]  M. Skolnik,et al.  Introduction to Radar Systems , 2021, Advances in Adaptive Radar Detection and Range Estimation.

[15]  Pedro M. Domingos,et al.  On the Optimality of the Simple Bayesian Classifier under Zero-One Loss , 1997, Machine Learning.

[16]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  An Efficient Methodology for Detection of Anomalous Propagation Echoes in Radar Reflectivity Data Using Neural Networks , 2000 .

[17]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Detection of anomalous propagation echoes in weather radar data using neural networks , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  Dawei Han,et al.  Correction of the bright band using dual‐polarisation radar , 2005 .

[19]  A. R. T. Schuur,et al.  Observations and Classification of Echoes with the Polarimetric WSR-88 D radar Prepared by : , 2003 .

[20]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Classification of radar clutter using neural networks , 1991, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[21]  Dino Giuli,et al.  Rainfall and Clutter Discrimination by Means of Dual-linear Polarization Radar Measurements , 1991 .

[22]  Alexander V. Ryzhkov,et al.  Cloud Microphysics Retrieval Using S-Band Dual-Polarization Radar Measurements , 1999 .

[23]  Gyu Won Lee,et al.  Identification and Removal of Ground Echoes and Anomalous Propagation Using the Characteristics of Radar Echoes , 2006 .

[24]  Marc Berenguer,et al.  A Fuzzy Logic Technique for Identifying Nonprecipitating Echoes in Radar Scans , 2006 .

[25]  Matthias Steiner,et al.  Use of Three-Dimensional Reflectivity Structure for Automated Detection and Removal of Nonprecipitating Echoes in Radar Data , 2002 .

[26]  Jonathan J. Gourley,et al.  A Fuzzy Logic Algorithm for the Separation of Precipitating from Nonprecipitating Echoes Using Polarimetric Radar Observations , 2007 .

[27]  Louis J. Battan,et al.  Radar Observation of the Atmosphere , 1973 .

[28]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Statistical Detection of Anomalous Propagation in Radar Reflectivity Patterns , 1994 .

[29]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Bayesian Network Classifiers , 1997, Machine Learning.

[30]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Evaluation of Anomalous Propagation Echo Detection in WSR-88D Data: A Large Sample Case Study , 2001 .

[31]  Reinaldo B. da Silveira,et al.  An automatic identification of clutter and anomalous propagation in polarization-diversity weather radar data using neural networks , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[32]  Dawn Harrison,et al.  Improving precipitation estimates from weather radar using quality control and correction techniques , 2000 .

[33]  Ian Cluckie,et al.  A high‐resolution radar experiment on the island of Jersey , 2007 .

[34]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Classification of radar clutter in an air traffic control environment , 1991, Proc. IEEE.

[35]  J. Mendel.  Fuzzy logic systems for engineering: a tutorial , 1995, Proc. IEEE.