Consciousness and Ethics: Artificially Conscious Moral Agents

What roles or functions does consciousness fulfill in the making of moral decisions? Will artificial agents capable of making appropriate decisions in morally charged situations require machine consciousness? Should the capacity to make moral decisions be considered an attribute essential for being designated a fully conscious agent? Research on the prospects for developing machines capable of making moral decisions and research on machine consciousness have developed as independent fields of inquiry. Yet there is significant overlap. Both fields are likely to progress through the instantiation of systems with artificial general intelligence (AGI). Certainly special classes of moral decision making will require attributes of consciousness such as being able to empathize with the pain and suffering of others. But in this article we will propose that consciousness also plays a functional role in making most if not all moral decisions. Work by the authors of this article with LIDA, a computational and conceptual model of human cognition, will help illustrate how consciousness can be understood to serve a very broad role in the making of all decisions including moral decisions.

[1]  J. Haidt,et al.  The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. , 2008 .

[2]  Peter L. Sheras,et al.  "From Jerusalem to Jericho": A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. , 1973 .

[3]  Steve Torrance,et al.  Ethics and consciousness in artificial agents , 2008, AI & SOCIETY.

[4]  Pentti O. A. Haikonen.  QUALIA AND CONSCIOUS MACHINES , 2009 .

[5]  Colin Allen,et al.  Prolegomena to any future artificial moral agent , 2000, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[6]  A. Isen,et al.  Effect of feeling good on helping: cookies and kindness. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  B. Baars.  A cognitive theory of consciousness , 1988 .

[8]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[9]  Stan Franklin,et al.  A Conceptual and Computational Model of Moral Decision Making in Human and Artificial Agents , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[10]  L. Katz,et al.  Evolutionary origins of morality : cross-disciplinary perspectives , 2000 .

[11]  B. Baars,et al.  The Timing of the Cognitive Cycle , 2011, PloS one.

[12]  J. Haidt,et al.  Social Intuitionists Answer Six Questions About Morality , 2007 .

[13]  Joseph M. Paxton,et al.  Moral Reasoning: Hints and Allegations , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[14]  J. Panksepp.  Affective consciousness: Core emotional feelings in animals and humans , 2005, Consciousness and Cognition.

[15]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework , 2001, Cognition.

[16]  Stan Franklin,et al.  THE LIDA ARCHITECTURE: ADDING NEW MODES OF LEARNING TO AN INTELLIGENT, AUTONOMOUS, SOFTWARE AGENT , 2006 .

[17]  Ran R. Hassin,et al.  The New Unconscious , 2006 .

[18]  Wendell Wallach,et al.  Robot minds and human ethics: the need for a comprehensive model of moral decision making , 2010, Ethics and Information Technology.

[19]  Bernard J. Baars,et al.  An architectural model of conscious and unconscious brain functions: Global Workspace Theory and IDA , 2007, Neural Networks.

[20]  M. Banaji,et al.  Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. , 1995, Psychological review.

[21]  B. Baars,et al.  The Role of Consciousness in Memory , 2005 .

[22]  C. Allen,et al.  Artificial Morality: Top-down, Bottom-up, and Hybrid Approaches , 2005, Ethics and Information Technology.

[23]  Jonathan Haidt,et al.  Social intuitionists answer six questions about moral psychology. , 2008 .

[24]  F. D. Waal,et al.  Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved , 2006 .

[25]  B. Baars,et al.  LIDA: A Working Model of Cognition , 2006 .

[26]  B. Baars,et al.  Criteria for consciousness in humans and other mammals , 2005, Consciousness and Cognition.

[27]  J. Haidt.  The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[28]  David B. Edelman,et al.  Animal consciousness: a synthetic approach , 2009, Trends in Neurosciences.

[29]  F. Salzano.  Primates and philosophers: how morality evolved , 2007 .

[30]  J. Gips.  Towards the ethical robot , 1995 .

[31]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Converging Intracranial Markers of Conscious Access , 2009, PLoS biology.

[32]  Wendell Wallach,et al.  Machine morality: bottom-up and top-down approaches for modelling human moral faculties , 2008, AI & SOCIETY.

[33]  Stan Franklin,et al.  Motivations , Values and Emotions : Three Sides of the same Coin , 2006 .

[34]  M. Shanahan.  A cognitive architecture that combines internal simulation with a global workspace , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[35]  Samir Chopra,et al.  A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents , 2011 .

[36]  Peter Carruthers,et al.  The Innate Mind, Volume 3 , 2005 .

[37]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[38]  Jordi Vallverdú,et al.  The Panic Room: On Synthetic Emotions , 2008 .

[39]  T. Carnahan.  Interpersonal Dynamics of Volunteers for a Simulated Prison Study, General Psychological Study, and a Helping-Behavior Study , 2004 .

[40]  Boria Sax,et al.  Wild Justice: The Moral Lives of Animals , 2010 .

[41]  T. Abeles.  Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong , 2010 .

[42]  December,et al.  The moral mind : How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues , and perhaps even modules , 2007 .