ABSTRACT A mechanical model of the coupler and draft gear was established to study the mechanism during an intercity train collision. The model includes four rigid bodies, one spherical joint, two nonlinear torsion spring units and two nonlinear hysteresis units. Simulation and test results show that the axial characteristics of the model are reasonable and the model can reasonably simulate the pitching movement of the coupler. The influence of the coupler and draft gear on the collision behaviour of the train is analysed considering a four-section intercity train. The results show that during the collision process, the amount of compression of the middle coupler is an important factor influencing the pitching deflection angle. The pitching motion posture of the coupler changes with the initial pitching deflection angle, but the initial pitching deflection angle has little effect on its yawing deflection angle. When the pitching angle of the middle coupler is elevated, as the elevation angle increases, the derailment risk of the ‘A’ end bogie of the previous vehicle increases, whereas the risk of derailment of the ‘B’ end bogie of the subsequent vehicle decreases. When the pitching angle of the middle coupler is depressed, the derailment trends for the front and rear bogies exhibit the opposite trend from that of the elevation angle. As the train collision speed increases, the pitching motion of the middle coupler is limited to forcing a yawing motion, causing the yawing deflection angle to increase sharply, which causes the wheel–rail lateral force to increase rapidly. From this, the derailment risk of the bogie increases, which further causes large displacement lateral buckling of the train. An anti-lateral buckling device can limit the yawing deflection angle of the middle coupler, preventing lateral buckling from large displacement and decreasing the risk of derailment.
[1]
Thomas Geike.
Understanding high coupler forces at metro vehicles
,
2007
.
[2]
S W Kirkpatrick,et al.
Evaluation of passenger rail vehicle crashworthiness
,
2001
.
[3]
Maksym Spiryagin,et al.
Advanced dynamic modelling for friction draft gears
,
2015
.
[4]
Jeong Seo Koo,et al.
A numerical study of the derailment caused by collision of a rail vehicle using a virtual testing model
,
2012
.
[5]
Hyung-Suk Han,et al.
Simulation of Train Crashes in Three Dimensions
,
2003
.
[6]
Colin Cole,et al.
Simulated comparisons of wagon coupler systems in heavy haul trains
,
2006
.
[7]
Zhai Wan.
Research on the Dynamics Performance Evaluation Standard for Freight Trains and the Suggested Schemes(I) (To Be Continued)--Safety Evaluation Standard for Prevention of Derailment
,
2002
.
[8]
David Tyrell,et al.
An Overview of Passenger Equipment Fullscale Impact Tests: Results to Date
,
2001
.
[9]
D Chen.
Derailment Risk Due to Coupler Jack-Knifing under Longitudinal Buff Force
,
2010
.
[10]
R. Mayville,et al.
Investigation and simulation of lateral buckling in trains
,
1999,
Proceedings of the 1999 ASME/IEEE Joint Railroad Conference (Cat. No.99CH36340).
[11]
A Scholes,et al.
Development of Crashworthiness for Railway Vehicle Structures
,
1993
.