Initial evidence on differences among Enterovirus 71, Coxsackievirus A16 and Coxsackievirus B4 in binding to cell surface heparan sulphate

[1]  I. Sam,et al.  Enterovirus 71 Uses Cell Surface Heparan Sulfate Glycosaminoglycan as an Attachment Receptor , 2012, Journal of Virology.

[2]  C. Poh,et al.  In vitro evaluation of the antiviral activity of heparan sulfate mimetic compounds against Enterovirus 71. , 2012, Virus research.

[3]  H. Pourianfar,et al.  A Colorimetric-Based Accurate Method for the Determination of Enterovirus 71 Titer , 2012, Indian Journal of Virology.

[4]  M. Roivainen,et al.  Symmetry-Related Clustering of Positive Charges Is a Common Mechanism for Heparan Sulfate Binding in Enteroviruses , 2012, Journal of Virology.

[5]  G. Liang,et al.  How does cellular heparan sulfate function in viral pathogenicity? , 2011, Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES.

[6]  Kuender D Yang,et al.  Sialylated glycans as receptor and inhibitor of enterovirus 71 infection to DLD-1 intestinal cells , 2009, Virology Journal.

[7]  S. Koike,et al.  Scavenger receptor B2 is a cellular receptor for enterovirus 71 , 2009, Nature Medicine.

[8]  M. Shimojima,et al.  Human P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 is a functional receptor for enterovirus 71 , 2009, Nature Medicine.

[9]  S. Olofsson,et al.  Glycoconjugate glycans as viral receptors , 2005, Annals of medicine.

[10]  V. Ley,et al.  Heparan sulphate mediates swine vesicular disease virus attachment to the host cell. , 2004, The Journal of general virology.

[11]  C. Badorff,et al.  Heparan Sulfates and Coxsackievirus-Adenovirus Receptor: Each One Mediates Coxsackievirus B3 PD Infection , 2003, Journal of Virology.

[12]  S. Smirnov,et al.  Cell-binding properties of glycoprotein B of Aujeszky's disease virus. , 2002, Virus research.

[13]  D. Rabenstein.  Heparin and heparan sulfate: structure and function. , 2002, Natural product reports.

[14]  M. Schmidtke,et al.  A rapid assay for evaluation of antiviral activity against coxsackie virus B3, influenza virus A, and herpes simplex virus type 1. , 2001, Journal of virological methods.

[15]  I. Goodfellow,et al.  Echoviruses Bind Heparan Sulfate at the Cell Surface , 2001, Journal of Virology.

[16]  G. Loy,et al.  Inactivation of HSV-1 and HSV-2 and prevention of cell-to-cell virus spread by Santolina insularis essential oil. , 2000, Antiviral research.

[17]  R. Johnston,et al.  Mutations in the E2 glycoprotein of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus confer heparan sulfate interaction, low morbidity, and rapid clearance from blood of mice. , 2000, Virology.

[18]  E. Domingo,et al.  Rapid Selection in Modified BHK-21 Cells of a Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Variant Showing Alterations in Cell Tropism , 1998, Journal of Virology.

[19]  R. Johnston,et al.  Adaptation of Sindbis Virus to BHK Cells Selects for Use of Heparan Sulfate as an Attachment Receptor , 1998, Journal of Virology.

[20]  E. Domingo,et al.  Multiple Virulence Determinants of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus in Cell Culture , 1998, Journal of Virology.

[21]  P. Mason,et al.  Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Virulent for Cattle Utilizes the Integrin αvβ3 as Its Receptor , 1998, Journal of Virology.

[22]  J. Coburn,et al.  Different Classes of Proteoglycans Contribute to the Attachment of Borrelia burgdorferi to Cultured Endothelial and Brain Cells , 1998, Infection and Immunity.

[23]  P. Mason,et al.  Tissue culture adaptation of foot-and-mouth disease virus selects viruses that bind to heparin and are attenuated in cattle , 1997, Journal of virology.

[24]  S. J. Flynn,et al.  The amino-terminal one-third of pseudorabies virus glycoprotein gIII contains a functional attachment domain, but this domain is not required for the efficient penetration of Vero cells , 1993, Journal of virology.

[25]  R. Langer,et al.  Enzymatic degradation of glycosaminoglycans. , 1995, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.