The influence of topic knowledge, external strategy use, and college experience on students' comprehension of controversial texts

Abstract This study examined the influence of three personal factors, namely, prior knowledge about the text topic, external strategy use during reading, and experience in college, on students' comprehension of the relations among controversial texts. Eighty-six 1-year and 80 3-year undergraduate students answered a questionnaire assessing topic knowledge. One week later, they read two controversial texts and then completed two tasks assessing their comprehension of intertextual relations and recall of intratextual arguments respectively. The results indicated that topic knowledge influenced the comprehension of intertextual relations through enhancing the processing of intratextual arguments. The production of summary notes during reading had indirect and direct positive effects. Longer experience in college led to a better understanding of intertextual relations.

[1]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  A Schema-Theoretic View of Basic Processes in Reading Comprehension. Technical Report No. 306. , 1988 .

[2]  Js Chall,et al.  Stages of reading development (2nd ed. , 1996 .

[3]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[4]  Michael B. W. Wolfe,et al.  Relations Between Adolescents' Text Processing and Reasoning , 2005 .

[5]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Understanding the materiality of writing from multiple sources , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. , 1996 .

[7]  J. Chall.  Stages of reading development , 1983 .

[8]  Keiichi Kobayashi,et al.  The Influence of Critical Reading Orientation on External Strategy Use during Expository Text Reading , 2007 .

[9]  David C. Caverly,et al.  Textbook study reading. , 2000 .

[10]  W. Kintsch.  Text comprehension, memory, and learning. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[11]  James F. Voss,et al.  Text Processing of Domain-Related Information for Individuals with High and Low Domain Knowledge: Methodological Considerations. , 1979 .

[12]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  FACILITATING TEXTUAL INTEGRATION WITH MACRO-STRUCTURE FOCUSING TASKS , 2004 .

[13]  C. Westby.  21st Century Literacy for a Diverse World , 2004, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[14]  S. Wineburg.  On the Reading of Historical Texts: Notes on the Breach Between School and Academy , 1991 .

[15]  Peter Afflerbach,et al.  Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading , 1996 .

[16]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  The influence of topic knowledge, domain knowledge, and interest on the comprehension of scientific exposition , 1994 .

[17]  David C. Caverly,et al.  Handbook of College Reading and Study Strategy Research , 2000 .

[18]  Ulrich Schiefele,et al.  Topic interest and levels of text comprehension. , 1992 .

[19]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Improving Students' Ability to Identify and Use Source Information , 2002 .

[20]  Kirsti Lonka,et al.  Spontaneous study strategies and the quality of knowledge construction , 1997 .

[21]  Steven A. Stahl.  What Happens When Students Read Multiple Source Documents in History? Reading Research Report No. 45. , 1996 .

[22]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Text-based Learning and Reasoning: Studies in History , 1995 .

[23]  Raymond W. Kulhavy,et al.  Notetaking and depth of processing , 1979 .

[24]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[25]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Volume 2. , 2005 .

[26]  Kathryn Alesandrini,et al.  Generation of Summaries and Analogies and Analytic and Holistic Abilities , 1990 .

[27]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  The Skills of Document Use: From Text Comprehension to Web-Based Learning , 2006 .

[28]  Helge I. Strømsø,et al.  Effects of Personal Epistemology on the Understanding of Multiple Texts , 2006 .

[29]  Catherine Snow,et al.  Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension , 2002 .

[30]  Keiichi Kobayashi,et al.  Comprehension of relations among controversial texts: effects of external strategy use , 2009 .

[31]  J. Wiley.  A fair and balanced look at the news: What affects memory for controversial arguments?☆ , 2005 .

[32]  S. Hidi,et al.  The Role Of Interest In Learning And Development , 1994 .

[33]  H. Oostendorp,et al.  The Construction of Mental Representations During Reading , 1998 .