Evaluating the effect of network density and geometric distribution on kinematic source inversion models

The effect of network density and geometric distribution on kinematic non-linear source inversion is investigated by inverting synthetic ground motions from a buried strike-slip fault ( M w 6.5), that have been generated by dynamic spontaneous rupture modelling. For the inversion, we use a physics-based regularized Yoffe function as slip velocity function. We test three different cases of station network geometry: (i) single station, varying azimuth and epicentral distance; (ii) multistation circular configurations, that is stations at similar distances from the fault, and regularly spaced around the fault; (iii) irregular multistation configurations using different numbers of stations. Our results show: (1) single station tests suggest that it may be possible to obtain a relatively good source model even using a single station. The best source model using a single station is obtained with stations at which amplitude ratios between three components are not large. We infer that both azimuthal angle and source-to-station distance play an important role in the design of optimal seismic network for source inversion. (2) Multistation tests show that the quality of the inverted source systematically correlates neither with the number of stations, nor with waveform misfit. (3) Waveform misfit has a direct correlation with the number of stations, resulting in overfitting the observed data without any systematic improvement of the source. It suggests that the best source model is not necessarily derived from the model with minimum waveform misfit. (4) A seismic network with a small number of well-spaced stations around the fault may be sufficient to obtain acceptable source inversion.

[1]  Elisa Tinti,et al.  A Kinematic Source Time Function Compatible With Earthquake Dynamics: Relations Between Kinematic and Dynamic Parameters , 2004 .

[2]  A. Tarantola,et al.  Inverse problems = Quest for information , 1982 .

[3]  T. Iwata,et al.  Source Rupture Process of the 2004 Chuetsu, Mid-Niigata Prefecture, Japan, Earthquake Inferred from Waveform Inversion with Dense Strong-Motion Data , 2009 .

[4]  A. Bizzarri Analytical representation of the fault slip velocity from spontaneous dynamic earthquake models , 2012 .

[5]  Daniel T. Trugman,et al.  A 2D Pseudodynamic Rupture Model Generator for Earthquakes on Geometrically Complex Faults , 2014 .

[6]  K. Shimazaki,et al.  The effect of strong-motion array configuration on source inversion , 1986 .

[7]  E. Yoffe,et al.  LXXV. The moving griffith crack , 1951 .

[8]  Robert W. Graves,et al.  Resolution analysis of finite fault source inversion using one- and three-dimensional Green's functions. 1. Strong motions , 2001 .

[9]  Allen H. Olson,et al.  Finite faults and inverse theory with applications to the 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake , 1982 .

[10]  S. Day Three-dimensional simulation of spontaneous rupture: The effect of nonuniform prestress , 1982 .

[11]  J. Beck,et al.  Accounting for prediction uncertainty when inferring subsurface fault slip , 2014 .

[12]  Pengcheng Liu,et al.  The 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake: Investigation of rupture velocity, risetime, and high‐frequency radiation , 1996 .

[13]  Y. Yagi,et al.  Importance of covariance components in inversion analyses of densely sampled observed data: an application to waveform data inversion for seismic source processes , 2008 .

[14]  Luis A. Dalguer,et al.  Pseudodynamic Source Characterization for Strike-Slip Faulting Including Stress Heterogeneity and Super-Shear Ruptures , 2012 .

[15]  P. Mai,et al.  Uncertainty in Earthquake Source Imaging Due to Variations in Source Time Function and Earth Structure , 2014 .

[16]  A. Zollo,et al.  Earthquake source kinematics of moderate earthquakes from the inversion of apparent source time functions , 2013 .

[17]  Jean-Bernard Minster,et al.  Dynamic Rupture Models for the Southern San Andreas Fault , 2010 .

[18]  Luis A. Dalguer,et al.  Evaluating the Compatibility of Dynamic Rupture‐Based Synthetic Ground Motion with Empirical Ground‐Motion Prediction Equation , 2014 .

[19]  A. Zollo,et al.  Kinematic Source Parameters for the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake from the Nonlinear Inversion of Accelerograms , 2005 .

[20]  James N. Brune,et al.  Scale-Model and Numerical Simulations of Near-Fault Seismic Directivity , 2008 .

[21]  Elizabeth S. Cochran,et al.  Earthquake source characterization by the isochrone back projection method using near-source ground motions , 2010 .

[22]  Igor A. Beresnev,et al.  Uncertainties in Finite-Fault Slip Inversions: To What Extent to Believe? (A Critical Review) , 2003 .

[23]  P. M. Mai,et al.  Bayesian inference of kinematic earthquake rupture parameters through fitting of strong motion data , 2008 .

[24]  Luis A. Dalguer,et al.  Numerical Study of Ground-Motion Differences between Buried-Rupturing and Surface-Rupturing Earthquakes , 2009 .

[25]  Kojiro Irikura,et al.  Fault Geometry at the Rupture Termination of the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu Earthquake , 2000 .

[26]  T. Iwata,et al.  Rupture Process of the 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey, Earthquake Estimated from Strong-Motion Waveforms , 2002 .

[27]  P. Mai,et al.  Variability of Near-Field Ground Motion from Dynamic Earthquake Rupture Simulations , 2008 .

[28]  D. J. Andrews,et al.  Rupture velocity of plane strain shear cracks , 1976 .

[29]  Kojiro Irikura,et al.  Surface Rupturing and Buried Dynamic-Rupture Models Calibrated with Statistical Observations of Past Earthquakes , 2008 .

[30]  G. Festa Earthquake Source Inversion Blindtest: Initial Results and Further Developments , 2007 .

[31]  J. Avouac,et al.  Kinematic inversion of physically plausible earthquake source models obtained from dynamic rupture simulations , 2008 .

[32]  Kim B. Olsen,et al.  Three-Dimensional Dynamic Simulation of the 1992 Landers Earthquake , 1997 .

[33]  Albert Tarantola,et al.  Inverse problem theory - and methods for model parameter estimation , 2004 .

[34]  J. Schmedes,et al.  Correlation of earthquake source parameters inferred from dynamic rupture simulations , 2010 .

[35]  E. Yoffe,et al.  The moving Griffith crack , 1951 .

[36]  P. Mai,et al.  The transition of dynamic rupture styles in elastic media under velocity-weakening friction , 2012 .

[37]  Relationship between strong-motion array parameters and the accuracy of source inversion and physical waves , 1990 .

[38]  L. Dalguer,et al.  Importance of 1-point statistics in earthquake source modelling for ground motion simulation , 2012 .

[39]  P. Mai,et al.  Near-Source Ground Motion Variability from M~6.5 Dynamic Rupture Simulations , 2011 .

[40]  Susana Custódio,et al.  The 2004 Mw6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake: Inversion of near‐source ground motion using multiple data sets , 2005 .

[41]  Mustafa Aktar,et al.  Space and Time Evolution of Rupture and Faulting during the 1999 İzmit (Turkey) Earthquake , 2002 .

[42]  S. Day,et al.  Sensitivity Study of Physical Limits on Ground Motion at Yucca Mountain , 2010 .

[43]  Michel Campillo,et al.  Frequency domain inversion of strong motions: Application to the 1992 Landers earthquake , 1995 .

[44]  G. Festa,et al.  Kinematic Inversion of Strong‐Motion Data Using a Gaussian Parameterization for the Slip: Application to the 2008 Iwate–Miyagi, Japan, Earthquake , 2012 .

[45]  R. Archuleta,et al.  A new nonlinear finite fault inversion with three-dimensional Green's functions: Application to the 1989 Loma Prieta, California, earthquake , 2004 .

[46]  Gregory C. Beroza,et al.  A Pseudo-Dynamic Approximation to Dynamic Rupture Models for Strong Ground Motion Prediction , 2004 .

[47]  Harsha S. Bhat,et al.  Attenuation of radiated ground motion and stresses from three‐dimensional supershear ruptures , 2007 .

[48]  R. Madariaga,et al.  Dynamic modeling of the 1992 Landers earthquake , 2001 .

[49]  D. Wald,et al.  Spatial and temporal distribution of slip for the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[50]  J. D. Riera,et al.  The Importance of the Dynamic Source Effects on Strong Ground Motion during the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake: Brief Interpretation of the Damage Distribution on Buildings , 2004 .

[51]  P. Spudich CHAPTER 5 – Techniques for Earthquake Ground-Motion Calculation with Applications to Source Parameterization of Finite Faults , 1987 .

[52]  C. Ji,et al.  What the exercise of the SPICE source inversion validation BlindTest 1 did not tell you , 2012 .

[53]  K. Irikura,et al.  Rupture process of the 1983 Japan Sea (Akita-Oki) earthquake using a waveform inversion method , 1986 .

[54]  Aldo Zollo,et al.  Combining strong-motion, InSAR and GPS data to refine the fault geometry and source kinematics of the 2011, Mw 6.2, Christchurch earthquake (New Zealand) , 2013 .

[55]  Teruo Yamashita,et al.  A cohesive zone model for dynamic shear faulting based on experimentally inferred constitutive relation and strong motion source parameters , 1989 .

[56]  P. Spudich,et al.  A global search inversion for earthquake kinematic rupture history: Application to the 2000 western Tottori, Japan earthquake , 2007 .

[57]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  Inversion of strong ground motion and teleseismic waveform data for the fault rupture history of the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake , 1983 .

[58]  M. Page,et al.  Constraining earthquake source inversions with GPS data: 2. A two‐step approach to combine seismic and geodetic data sets , 2009 .

[59]  Keiiti Aki,et al.  Fault plane with barriers: A versatile earthquake model , 1977 .

[60]  Shamita Das,et al.  Effect of non-uniform station coverage on the inversion for earthquake rupture history for a Haskell-type source model , 1998 .

[61]  Anthony Lomax,et al.  Rupture history of the 2009 L'Aquila (Italy) earthquake from non‐linear joint inversion of strong motion and GPS data , 2009 .

[62]  A. Pitarka,et al.  The SCEC/USGS Dynamic Earthquake Rupture Code Verification Exercise , 2012 .

[63]  Geoffrey Palarz Ely,et al.  A support-operator method for viscoelastic wave modelling in 3-D heterogeneous media , 2008 .

[64]  Seok Goo Song,et al.  Physics-Based Earthquake Source Characterization and Modeling with Geostatistics , 2010 .

[65]  James L. Beck,et al.  Bayesian inversion for finite fault earthquake source models I—theory and algorithm , 2013 .