Bridging the Health Data Divide

Fundamental quality, safety, and cost problems have not been resolved by the increasing digitization of health care. This digitization has progressed alongside the presence of a persistent divide between clinicians, the domain experts, and the technical experts, such as data scientists. The disconnect between clinicians and data scientists translates into a waste of research and health care resources, slow uptake of innovations, and poorer outcomes than are desirable and achievable. The divide can be narrowed by creating a culture of collaboration between these two disciplines, exemplified by events such as datathons. However, in order to more fully and meaningfully bridge the divide, the infrastructure of medical education, publication, and funding processes must evolve to support and enhance a learning health care system.

[1]  D. Windish,et al.  Medicine residents' understanding of the biostatistics and results in the medical literature. , 2007, JAMA.

[2]  Leo Anthony Celi,et al.  Preparing a New Generation of Clinicians for the Era of Big Data. , 2015, Harvard medical student review.

[3]  M. Graber The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine , 2013, BMJ quality & safety.

[4]  N. Horton,et al.  Statistical methods in the journal. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Yohsuke Imai,et al.  Effects of unique biomedical education programs for engineers: REDEEM and ESTEEM projects. , 2009, Advances in physiology education.

[6]  J D Humphrey,et al.  A new paradigm for graduate research and training in the biomedical sciences and engineering. , 2005, Advances in physiology education.

[7]  M. Field,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines : directions for a new program , 1990 .

[8]  Diana Slade,et al.  Big data as a new approach in emergency medicine research , 2015 .

[9]  L. Tran,et al.  Integrated Systems Approach Identifies Genetic Nodes and Networks in Late-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease , 2013, Cell.

[10]  D. Nathan Clinical research: perceptions, reality, and proposed solutions. National Institutes of Health Director's Panel on Clinical Research. , 1998, JAMA.

[11]  J. Greene,et al.  Reform, regulation, and pharmaceuticals--the Kefauver-Harris Amendments at 50. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  C. Lucey Medical education: part of the problem and part of the solution. , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.

[13]  M. Angell,et al.  Publish or perish: a proposal. , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[14]  P. Maurette [To err is human: building a safer health system]. , 2002, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation.

[15]  C. Sprung,et al.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock, 2012 , 2013, Intensive Care Medicine.

[16]  Cynthia Rudin,et al.  Machine learning for science and society , 2013, Machine Learning.

[17]  Leo Anthony Celi,et al.  A “datathon” model to support cross-disciplinary collaboration , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[18]  Kiri Wagstaff,et al.  Machine Learning that Matters , 2012, ICML.

[19]  Avner Schlessinger,et al.  ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI , 2012 .

[20]  D. Nathan Clinical Research: Perceptions, Reality, and Proposed Solutions , 1998 .