Maritime routing and speed optimization with emission control areas

Abstract Strict limits on the maximum sulphur content in fuel used by ships have recently been imposed in some Emission Control Areas (ECAs). In order to comply with these regulations many ship operators will switch to more expensive low-sulphur fuel when sailing inside ECAs. Since they are concerned about minimizing their costs, it is likely that speed and routing decisions will change because of this. In this paper, we develop an optimization model to be applied by ship operators for determining sailing paths and speeds that minimize operating costs for a ship along a given sequence of ports. We perform a computational study on a number of realistic shipping routes in order to evaluate possible impacts on sailing paths and speeds, and hence fuel consumption and costs, from the ECA regulations. Moreover, the aim is to examine the implications for the society with regards to environmental effects. Comparisons of cases show that a likely effect of the regulations is that ship operators will often choose to sail longer distances to avoid sailing time within ECAs. Another effect is that they will sail at lower speeds within and higher speeds outside the ECAs in order to use less of the more expensive fuel. On some shipping routes, this might give a considerable increase in the total amount of fuel consumed and the CO2 emissions.

[1]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  Emission control areas and their impact on maritime transport , 2014 .

[2]  Kjetil Fagerholt,et al.  Integrated maritime fleet deployment and speed optimization: Case study from RoRo shipping , 2015, Comput. Oper. Res..

[3]  Inge Norstad,et al.  Analysis of an exact algorithm for the vessel speed optimization problem , 2013, Networks.

[4]  Zhiyuan Liu,et al.  Bunker consumption optimization methods in shipping: A critical review and extensions , 2013 .

[5]  Inge Norstad,et al.  Tramp ship routing and scheduling with speed optimization , 2011 .

[6]  Jacob Kronbak,et al.  The costs and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: Sulphur scrubbers versus marine gas oil , 2014 .

[7]  Inge Norstad,et al.  Reducing fuel emissions by optimizing speed on shipping routes , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[8]  Orestis Schinas,et al.  Cost assessment of environmental regulation and options for marine operators , 2012 .

[9]  Kjetil Fagerholt,et al.  Optimized selection of air emission controls for vessels , 2012 .

[10]  Christos A. Kontovas,et al.  Ship speed optimization: Concepts, models and combined speed-routing scenarios , 2014 .

[11]  Erik Fridell,et al.  Compliance possibilities for the future ECA regulations through the use of abatement technologies or change of fuels , 2014 .

[12]  Harilaos N. Psaraftis,et al.  The possible designation of the Mediterranean Sea as a SECA: A case study , 2014 .

[13]  Kjetil Fagerholt,et al.  Planning vessel air emission regulations compliance under uncertainty , 2013 .

[14]  Ian Jenkinson,et al.  Selection of techniques for reducing shipping NOx and SOx emissions , 2012 .

[15]  Christos A. Kontovas,et al.  Speed models for energy-efficient maritime transportation: A taxonomy and survey , 2013 .

[16]  Marjorie Doudnikoff,et al.  Effect of a speed reduction of containerships in response to higher energy costs in Sulphur Emission Control Areas , 2014 .