Mental model theory versus the inference rule approach in relational reasoning

Researchers currently working on relational reasoning typically argue that mental model theory (MMT) is a better account than the inference rule approach (IRA). They predict and observe that determinate (or one-model) problems are easier than indeterminate (or two-model) problems, whereas according to them, IRA should lead to the opposite prediction. However, the predictions attributed to IRA are based on a mistaken argument. The IRA is generally presented in such a way that inference rules only deal with determinate relations and not with indeterminate ones. However, (a) there is no reason to presuppose that a rule-based procedure could not deal with indeterminate relations, and (b) applying a rule-based procedure to indeterminate relations should result in greater difficulty. Hence, none of the recent articles devoted to relational reasoning currently presents a conclusive case for discarding IRA by using the well-known determinate vs indeterminate problems comparison.

[1]  D. J. WOOD.  Approach to the Study of Human Reasoning , 1969, Nature.

[2]  B. Fellows,et al.  'Perceptual' strategies in the solving of three term series problems. , 1975 .

[3]  P. Johnson-Laird.  Mental models , 1989 .

[4]  Göran Hagert,et al.  Modeling Mental Models: Experiments in Cognitive Modeling of Spatial Reasoning , 1984, ECAI.

[5]  Don Steinberg,et al.  Deductive reasoning , 1989 .

[6]  K. Gilhooly,et al.  Lines of thinking : reflections on the psychology of thought , 1990 .

[7]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Propositional reasoning by model. , 1992, Psychological review.

[8]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Human Reasoning: The Psychology Of Deduction , 1993 .

[9]  M. Braine,et al.  Propositional reasoning by mental models? Simple to refute in principle and in practice. , 1994, Psychological review.

[10]  L. Bonatti,et al.  Why should we abandon the mental logic hypothesis? , 1994, Cognition.

[11]  L. Bonatti.  Propositional reasoning by model , 1994 .

[12]  Walter Schaeken,et al.  Why models rather than rules give a better account of propositional reasoning: A reply to Bonatti and to O'Brien, Braine, and Yang , 1994 .

[13]  L. Rips.  The Psychology of Proof: Deductive Reasoning in Human Thinking , 1994 .

[14]  P Aldhous.  Leveling the playing field in Stockholm. , 1994, Science.

[15]  A. Vandierendonck.  Evidence for Mental-model-based Reasoning: A Comparison of Reasoning with Time and Space Concepts , 1996 .

[16]  W. Schaeken,et al.  Tense, Aspect, and Temporal Reasoning , 1996 .

[17]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental models and temporal reasoning , 1996, Cognition.

[18]  A. Vandierendonck,et al.  Working Memory Constraints on Linear Reasoning with Spatial and Temporal Contents , 1997, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[19]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Reasoning about relations: Spatial and nonspatial problems , 1997 .

[20]  K. C. Klauer.  Working Memory Involvement in Propositional and Spatial Reasoning , 1997 .

[21]  Mental models and working memory in temporal and spatial reasoning , 1998 .

[22]  André Vandierendonck,et al.  Mental models and working memory in temporal reasoning and spatial reasoning , 1998 .

[23]  David P. O'Brien,et al.  Some Empirical Justification of the Mental-Predicate-Logic Model , 1998 .

[24]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  The Effect of an Irrelevant Premise on Temporal and Spatial Reasoning , 1998, Kognitionswissenschaft.

[25]  P N Johnson-Laird,et al.  Deductive reasoning. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[26]  Jean-Baptiste Van der Henst.  The mental model theory of spatial reasoning re‐examined: The role of relevance in premise order , 1999 .

[27]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Strategies in temporal reasoning , 2000 .

[28]  A. Vandierendonck,et al.  Model construction and elaboration in spatial linear syllogisms , 2000 .

[29]  M. Roberts.  Strategies in relational inference , 2000 .

[30]  R. Pigeau,et al.  The mental representation and processes of spatial deductive reasoning with diagrams and sentences , 2001 .

[31]  P. Johnson-Laird.  Mental models and deduction , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  R. Dolan,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of three-term relational reasoning , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  Gaynor Williams.  Space to Think , 2004 .