The impact of object animacy on the appraisal of causality.

The goal of this study was to examine whether animacy of objects affected the appraisal of a causal relationship when one object was observed to propel the other either immediately, after a delay, or at a distance. Participants rated the degree of causal interaction either before or after an extended experience with observing the interactions. We expected that spatial distance would have little effect when objects were seen as animate (because social interactions often span spatial gaps) and would have a degrading effect when objects were appraised as inanimate. Motion animacy appeared to attenuate the impact of a gap and to decrease initial causal judgments for direct collisions. Explicitly informing participants about the nature of the objects had a strong impact. Experience with the causal task affected ratings to a greater extent when the objects were explicitly described as nonliving rather than living.

[1]  A. Leslie,et al.  Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? , 1987, Cognition.

[2]  A. Sedlak,et al.  A Review of Children's Use of Causal Inference Principles. , 1981 .

[3]  B. Rimé,et al.  The perception of interpersonal emotions originated by patterns of movement , 1985 .

[4]  D. Shanks,et al.  Human instrumental learning: a critical review of data and theory. , 1993, British journal of psychology.

[5]  F. Keil.  The Development of the Young Child's Ability to Anticipate the Outcomes of Simple Causal Events. , 1979 .

[6]  A. Leslie.  Spatiotemporal Continuity and the Perception of Causality in Infants , 1984, Perception.

[7]  John Garcia,et al.  Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning , 1966 .

[8]  R. Baron,et al.  Toward an Ecological Theory of Social Perception , 1983 .

[9]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues , 1977 .

[10]  A. Schlottmann,et al.  Perceptual causality in children. , 2002, Child development.

[11]  Kazuo Fujita,et al.  How do 8-month-old infants recognize causality in object motion and that in human action? , 2002 .

[12]  A. Michotte.  The perception of causality , 1963 .

[13]  N. Anderson,et al.  An information integration approach to phenomenal causality , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[14]  P. F. Powesland,et al.  The effect of practice upon the perception of causality. , 1959, Canadian journal of psychology.

[15]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[16]  E. Wasserman,et al.  College students' responding to and rating of contingency relations: The role of temporal contiguity. , 1986, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[17]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Temporal Contiguity and the Judgement of Causality by Human Subjects , 1989 .

[18]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Preschool Children's Assumptions about Cause and Effect: Temporal Ordering. , 1979 .

[19]  A. Schlottmann,et al.  Perceived physical and social causality in animated motions: spontaneous reports and ratings. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[20]  Stephen J. Misovich,et al.  Effects of Disruption of Structure and Motion on Perceptions of Social Causality , 1992 .

[21]  Michael E. Young.  On the origin of personal causal theories , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  J. Aronoff,et al.  The recognition of threatening facial stimuli. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  J E Cutting,et al.  A biomechanical invariant for gait perception. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  M. Buehner,et al.  Knowledge mediates the timeframe of covariation assessment in human causal induction , 2002 .

[25]  John E. Opfer,et al.  Identifying living and sentient kinds from dynamic information: the case of goal-directed versus aimless autonomous movement in conceptual change , 2002, Cognition.

[26]  S. Lea,et al.  Visual Perception of Intentional Motion , 1994, Perception.

[27]  H. Gruber,et al.  Effects of experience on perception of causality. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  Michael E Young,et al.  Causal impressions: Predictingwhen, not justwhether , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[29]  Lester M. Hyman,et al.  Which are the stimuli in facial displays of anger and happiness? Configurational bases of emotion recognition. , 1992 .

[30]  J. N. Bassili.  Temporal and spatial contingencies in the perception of social events , 1976 .

[31]  David Hume.  A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects , 1972 .

[32]  D. A. Lieberman,et al.  Learning: Behavior and cognition , 1990 .

[33]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perception of Animacy from the Motion of a Single Object , 2000, Perception.

[34]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perceptual causality and animacy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  Michael J. Pazzani,et al.  A Computational Theory of Learning Causal Relationships , 1991, Cogn. Sci..