Pathology in a tube: Step 1. Fixing, staining, and transporting pancreatic core biopsies in a microfluidic device for 3D imaging

A minimally-invasive diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is accomplished by obtaining a fine needle aspirate and observing the cell preparations under conventional optical microscopy. As an unavoidable artifact, native tissue architecture is lost, making definite diagnosis of malignancy, or invasive neoplasm, impossible. One solution is the preparation of core biopsies (CBs) within a microfluidic device that are subsequently imaged in 3D. In this paper, porcine pancreas CBs (L = 1-2 cm, D = 0.4-2.0 mm) were formalin-fixed, stained and optically cleared (FocusClear®). In brightfield at 40x, light transmission through the ordinarily opaque CBs was increased 5-15x, and internal islet structures were easily identified 250-300 μm beneath the tissue surface. Typically, specimen preparation is time intensive and requires precise handling since CBs are delicate; thus, fixative, absorptive stain and FocusClear® diffusion were done slowly and manually. To significantly speed up tissue processing, we developed a microfluidic device consisting of both a main channel (L = 12.5 cm, D = 1.415 mm) with a circular cross section used for fixing and transporting the CB and an intersecting U-channel employed for staining. Space between the CB and channel wall provided a key feature not traditionally employed in microfluidic devices, such that at low flow rates (5-10 mL/min) CBs were fixed and stained while the specimen remained stationary. By switching quickly to higher flow rates (15-20 mL/min), we could precisely overcome adhesion and transport the specimen within the channel towards the imaging platform for 3D pathology.

[1]  M. Brisson,et al.  Percutaneous US-guided renal biopsy: a retrospective study comparing the 16-gauge end-cut and 14-gauge side-notch needles. , 2010, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[2]  Teresa A. Brentnall,et al.  Arousal of cancer-associated stromal fibroblasts , 2012, Cell adhesion & migration.

[3]  Eric J. Seibel,et al.  High resolution optical projection tomographic microscopy for 3D tissue imaging , 2011, BiOS.

[4]  S. Baltacı,et al.  The long core needle with an end-cut technique for prostate biopsy: does it really have advantages when compared with standard needles? , 2004, European urology.

[5]  Kun Zhang,et al.  Microfluidic devices with permeable polymer barriers for capture and transport of biomolecules and cells. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[6]  Eric J. Seibel,et al.  Dual-modal optical projection tomography microscopy for cancer diagnosis , 2010, BiOS.

[7]  A. Folch,et al.  A microfluidic device for exposing tumor biopsy tissue to multiple drugs , 2012 .

[8]  M. Shuler,et al.  A three-channel microfluidic device for generating static linear gradients and its application to the quantitative analysis of bacterial chemotaxis. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[9]  Koji Hattori,et al.  Pressure-Driven Microfluidic Perfusion Culture Device for Integrated Dose-Response Assays , 2013, Journal of laboratory automation.

[10]  J. Hornaday,et al.  Cancer Facts & Figures 2004 , 2004 .

[11]  Peter Olson,et al.  Breaching the Cancer Fortress , 2009, Science.

[12]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2012 , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[13]  Scott L Diamond,et al.  Microfluidics and coagulation biology. , 2013, Annual review of biomedical engineering.