Energy-Aware Control of Euler–Bernoulli Beams by Means of an Axial Load

In this article, we present a novel energy-based control architecture on Euler–Bernoulli beams equipped with a variable stiffness mechanism. To proof the methodological validity of the approach, two control laws are developed using the power balance of the system, explicitly encoded in its infinite-dimensional port-Hamiltonian formulation. The laws are designed to stabilize the beam and to induce limit cycles on it, respectively, increasing damping by removing energy from the system and countering damping by injecting energy into the system. The variable stiffness mechanism is realized through a distributed axial load, applied by means of a wire on a winch, and is able to achieve effective stiffness variation due to softening. An experimental setup is designed to validate the theory. 3-D-printed, embedded, piezoresistive strain gauges are used as sensing units for closed-loop control. We show how the developed approach conveniently deals with such sensors, overcoming potential problems arising from their nonideal response. Experimental results show the validity and the robustness of the proposed control laws. High speed videos are used to validate the measurements.

[1]  G. Lauder,et al.  Tunable stiffness in fish robotics: mechanisms and advantages , 2021, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[2]  J. Slavič,et al.  Single-process 3D-printed structures with vibration durability self-awareness , 2021, Additive Manufacturing.

[3]  B. Titurus,et al.  Free vibration and stability analysis of a cantilever beam axially loaded by an intermittently attached tendon , 2021 .

[4]  S. Bedair,et al.  Creating 3D printed sensor systems with conductive composites , 2020, Smart Materials and Structures.

[5]  S. Stramigioli,et al.  A Review of Extrusion-Based 3D Printing for the Fabrication of Electro- and Biomechanical Sensors , 2020, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[6]  S. Stramigioli,et al.  Characterizing the Electrical Properties of Anisotropic, 3D-Printed Conductive Sheets for Sensor Applications , 2020, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[7]  Martijn Schouten,et al.  Hysteresis Compensation of 3D Printed Sensors by a Power Law Model with Reduced Parameters , 2020, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Flexible and Printable Sensors and Systems (FLEPS).

[8]  Changki Mo,et al.  3D printed conductive thermoplastic polyurethane/carbon nanotube composites for capacitive and piezoresistive sensing in soft pneumatic actuators , 2020 .

[9]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  Twenty years of distributed port-Hamiltonian systems: a literature review , 2020, IMA J. Math. Control. Inf..

[10]  Akif Kaynak,et al.  Closed-loop 4D-printed soft robots , 2020 .

[11]  Gianluca Percoco,et al.  Additive manufacturing and characterization of a load cell with embedded strain gauges , 2020, Precision Engineering.

[12]  Martijn Schouten,et al.  Linearisation of a 3D printed flexible tactile sensor based on piezoresistive sensing , 2019, 2019 IEEE SENSORS.

[13]  Filippo Cianetti,et al.  Dynamic Measurements Using FDM 3D-Printed Embedded Strain Sensors , 2019, Sensors.

[14]  Gijsbertus J.M. Krijnen,et al.  Embedded sensing: Integrating sensors in 3-D printed structures , 2018 .

[15]  Alain Delchambre,et al.  Flexible Medical Devices: Review of Controllable Stiffness Solutions , 2017 .

[16]  Wei Sun,et al.  The Boom in 3D-Printed Sensor Technology , 2017, Sensors.

[17]  Mariangela Manti,et al.  Stiffening in Soft Robotics: A Review of the State of the Art , 2016, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[18]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Energy-Aware Robotics , 2015 .

[19]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Modeling and Control of Complex Physical Systems - The Port-Hamiltonian Approach , 2014 .

[20]  Steffen Paul,et al.  Integration Without Disruption: The Basic Challenge of Sensor Integration , 2014, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[21]  Bjorn Augner,et al.  Stability and Stabilization of Infinite-dimensional Linear Port-Hamiltonian Systems , 2013, 1312.4307.

[22]  Hans Zwart,et al.  Linear Port-Hamiltonian Systems on Infinite-dimensional Spaces , 2012 .

[23]  Steven W. Shaw,et al.  Vibration Suppression in Structures Using Cable Actuators , 2010 .

[24]  David G. Wilson,et al.  What is a limit cycle? , 2008, Int. J. Control.

[25]  J. Aidanpää.  Mechanical Vibrations , 2007, Nature.

[26]  Steven W. Shaw,et al.  Active Vibration Control of a Flexible Beam Using a Buckling-Type End Force , 2006 .

[27]  Hans Zwart,et al.  Dirac structures and Boundary Control Systems associated with Skew-Symmetric Differential Operators , 2005, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[28]  K. Gu.  Stability and Stabilization of Infinite Dimensional Systems with Applications , 1999 .

[29]  A. Schaft,et al.  Port-controlled Hamiltonian systems : modelling origins and systemtheoretic properties , 1992 .

[30]  C. Radcliffe,et al.  Active Parametric Damping of Distributed Parameter Beam Transverse Vibration , 1989, 1989 American Control Conference.

[31]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Decoding and realising flapping flight with port-Hamiltonian system theory , 2021, Annu. Rev. Control..

[32]  H. Ecker,et al.  Experimental Results on Parametric Excitation Damping of an Axially Loaded Cantilever Beam , 2009 .

[33]  Horst Ecker,et al.  Active Damping of Vibrations of a Cantilever Beam by Axial Force Control , 2007 .

[34]  Alejandro F Frangi,et al.  This article has been accepted for inclusion in a future issue of this journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination. , 2022 .