Analyzing handwriting biometrics in metadata context

In this article, methods for user recognition by online handwriting are experimentally analyzed using a combination of demographic data of users in relation to their handwriting habits. Online handwriting as a biometric method is characterized by having high variations of characteristics that influences the reliance and security of this method. These variations have not been researched in detail so far. Especially in cross-cultural application it is urgent to reveal the impact of personal background to security aspects in biometrics. Metadata represent the background of writers, by introducing cultural, biological and conditional (changing) aspects like fist language, country of origin, gender, handedness, experiences the influence handwriting and language skills. The goal is the revelation of intercultural impacts on handwriting in order to achieve higher security in biometrical systems. In our experiments, in order to achieve a relatively high coverage, 48 different handwriting tasks have been accomplished by 47 users from three countries (Germany, India and Italy) have been investigated with respect to the relations of metadata and biometric recognition performance. For this purpose, hypotheses have been formulated and have been evaluated using the measurement of well-known recognition error rates from biometrics. The evaluation addressed both: system reliance and security threads by skilled forgeries. For the later purpose, a novel forgery type is introduced, which applies the personal metadata to security aspects and includes new methods of security tests. Finally in our paper, we formulate recommendations for specific user groups and handwriting samples.

[1]  Claus Vielhauer,et al.  Analyse biometrischer Handschriftverifikation im Kontext von Metadaten , 2006, Sicherheit.

[2]  P. Jonathon Phillips,et al.  Face Recognition Vendor Test 2002: Overview and Summary , 2003 .

[3]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Group discriminatory power of handwritten characters , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[4]  Ralf Steinmetz,et al.  Handwriting: Feature Correlation Analysis for Biometric Hashes , 2004, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[5]  Pranab K. Dutta,et al.  Finding meta data in speech and handwriting biometrics , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[6]  Claus Vielhauer Biometric User Authentication for it Security - From Fundamentals to Handwriting , 2006, Advances in Information Security.

[7]  Claus Vielhauer,et al.  A test tool to support brute-force online and offline signature forgery tests on mobile devices , 2003, 2003 International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. ICME '03. Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8698).

[8]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Can soft biometric traits assist user recognition? , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[9]  Bayya Yegnanarayana,et al.  A Cross-cultural Evaluation Framework for Behavioral Biometric User Authentication , 2005, GfKl.

[10]  Ralf Steinmetz,et al.  Biometric hash based on statistical features of online signatures , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[11]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Search engine for handwritten documents , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.