An Automatic Framework for Segmentation of Brain Tumours at Follow-up Scans after Radiation Therapy*

Brain metastasis is the most common intracranial malignancy with a poor overall survival (OS) after treatment. The standard stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) planning procedure for brain metastasis requires delineating the tumour volume on magnetic resonance (MR) images. MR images are also acquired at multiple follow-up scans after SRT to monitor the treatment outcome through measuring changes in the physical dimensions of the tumour. Such measurements require manual segmentation of the tumour volume on multiple slices of several follow-up images which is tedious and impedes the SRT evaluation work flow considerably. In this study, an automatic framework was proposed to segment the tumour volume on longitudinal MR images acquired at standard follow-up scans after SRT. The multi-step segmentation framework was based on region growing and morphological snakes models that applied the standard SRT planning tumour contour as a basis to approximate the tumour shape and location at each follow-up scan for an accurate automatic segmentation of tumour volume. The framework was evaluated using the MR imaging data acquired from five patients prior to and at three follow-up scans after SRT. The preliminary results indicated that the Dice similarity coefficient between the ground truth tumour masks and their automatically segmented counterparts ranged between 0.84 and 0.90, while the average Dice coefficient for all the follow-up scans was 0.88. The results obtained implied a good potential of the proposed framework for being incorporated into the SRT treatment planning and evaluation systems as well as outcome prediction models.

[1]  D. Hill,et al.  Medical image registration , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Stanley Osher,et al.  Level set methods in image science , 2003, Proceedings 2003 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.03CH37429).

[3]  A. Sahgal,et al.  A meta‐analysis evaluating stereotactic radiosurgery, whole‐brain radiotherapy, or both for patients presenting with a limited number of brain metastases , 2012, Cancer.

[4]  Chaofeng Liang,et al.  A Fully-Automatic Multiparametric Radiomics Model: Towards Reproducible and Prognostic Imaging Signature for Prediction of Overall Survival in Glioblastoma Multiforme , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[5]  M. Benna,et al.  Brain metastases epidemiology in a Tunisian population: trends and outcome , 2018, CNS oncology.

[6]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data , 2015, Radiology.

[7]  Mehrdad J. Gangeh,et al.  A priori Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response and Survival in Breast Cancer Patients using Quantitative Ultrasound , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Rolf Adams,et al.  Seeded Region Growing , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Ali Sadeghi-Naini,et al.  Predicting breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using pretreatment diffuse optical spectroscopic texture analysis , 2017, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  Mehrdad J. Gangeh,et al.  Computer Aided Theragnosis Using Quantitative Ultrasound Spectroscopy and Maximum Mean Discrepancy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Geodesic Active Contours , 1995, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[12]  Michael C. Kolios,et al.  Conventional frequency ultrasonic biomarkers of cancer treatment response in vivo. , 2013, Translational oncology.

[13]  Satoshi Suzuki,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases (JLGK0901): a multi-institutional prospective observational study. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[14]  Michael C. Kolios,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound Spectroscopic Imaging for Characterization of Disease Extent in Prostate Cancer Patients1 , 2015, Translational oncology.

[15]  Françoise Dibos,et al.  A morphological scheme for mean curvature motion and applications to anisotropic diffusion and motion of level sets , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[16]  Luis Álvarez,et al.  Morphological snakes , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[17]  Martin J. Yaffe,et al.  Imaging innovations for cancer therapy response monitoring , 2012 .

[18]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Active contours without edges , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[19]  Luis Álvarez,et al.  A Morphological Approach to Curvature-Based Evolution of Curves and Surfaces , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[20]  V. Esposito,et al.  Single-Fraction Versus Multifraction (3 × 9 Gy) Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Large (>2 cm) Brain Metastases: A Comparative Analysis of Local Control and Risk of Radiation-Induced Brain Necrosis. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Gregory J. Czarnota,et al.  Chemotherapy-Response Monitoring of Breast Cancer Patients Using Quantitative Ultrasound-Based Intra-Tumour Heterogeneities , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[22]  D. Rigamonti,et al.  Postradiation imaging changes in the CNS: how can we differentiate between treatment effect and disease progression? , 2014, Future oncology.

[23]  Ali Sadeghi-Naini,et al.  Early detection of chemotherapy-refractory patients by monitoring textural alterations in diffuse optical spectroscopic images. , 2015, Medical physics.

[24]  P. Lambin,et al.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach , 2014, Nature Communications.