A comprehensive theory is presented for the region of a planetary atmosphere where collisions are rare and where the controlling factors are gravitational attraction and thermal energy conducted from below. Although the subject of this article originated literally with the kinetic theory itself, until recently attention has been confined to atmospheric evaporation.
The early sections (1–4) are developed on the classic assumption of a sharply defined critical level, above which the atmosphere is completely free of collisions. Throughout, the different types of particle orbits are treated separately; coronal particles are either ballistic (meaning captive particles whose orbits intersect the critical level), satellite (captive particles orbiting above the critical level), or escaping. Liouville's equation leads to exact expressions for the density distributions and escape flux. The latter is a simple analytic expression, but the density integrals are more complex and numerical evaluations have been provided in tables.
At large distances from the planet all the integrals may be evaluated in their asymptotic limits. Expressions are given for the different density components, the kinetic temperature, and heat flux. The latter two cannot generally be evaluated with the thermal conductivity as normally computed.
The integrated density in a column above a specified height and orientated in a specified direction is given particular attention, because it fixes the critical level and because it is essentially an observable quantity. Numerical calculations are given for relating such observations in either the radial or transverse directions to the basic parameters of the corona (the criticallevel density, temperature, and height above the planet). The radial integrated density at the critical level is shown to deviate sensibly from the simple expression applicable to a planeparallel atmosphere unless the gravitational energy is very much greater than the mean thermal energy.
Section 5 utilizes results of the preceding theory to justify the adoption in the first place of the concept of a critical level. The principal question focuses on the outward flux of escaping particles. A detailed treatment of escape as governed by collisions agrees with earlier similar analyses in showing that (with certain approximations) the critical-level concept predicts the accurate flux. However, it is noted that this result, except for confirming the height of the critical level, is trivial: it is a consequence of an assumed Maxwellian distribution and the special properties accruing to it.
Section 6 treats a variety of related problems dealing with production and loss mechanisms, after some orbital properties and flight times are investigated. The critical-level theory cannot cope with the important question of the abundance of satellite orbits. Here it is shown that the satellite contribution may be included throughout the theory by omitting the expressions for the satellite component as such and evaluating the ballistic component, not with the critical level, but with a higher satellite critical level instead. For the Earth's hydrogen corona this level is near 2.5 Earth radii. The effect of photoionization on the density distribution of escaping orbits is also treated and shown to be negligible for the Earth. The concentration of hot interplanetary gas around a bare planet offers an interesting effect in that screening of orbits by the planet may more than counteract condensation due to the gravitational attraction. A hot, stationary interplanetary gas intermingled with a planetary corona will not have any appreciable effect on the coronal density or temperature distributions. Specifically, it is inappropriate to regard heat as being “conducted” (in the usual meaning of the word) from the interplanetary medium through the corona.
Doppler profiles of coronal particles in a column along a specified direction have been examined in Section 7. Asymptotic expressions are given along with the general formulae, which will have to be evaluated numerically if and when the pertinent spectral observations are made. Even at large distances from the planet where the population consists largely of escaping particles, the shape of the spectral profile does not deviate very seriously in radially outward velocities from the profile with the Maxwellian distribution at the critical level.
Section 8 examines the basic assumption of the entire preceding theory: the establishment of a Maxwellian distribution near the critical level. The collision treatment here is based on the Boltzmann equation, and while it is crude, it is not trivial. The conclusion is that the Maxwellian distribution in the upward direction is depleted beyond the escape velocity by several per cent, but this depletion is generally negligible when compared with errors produced by small uncertainties in temperature. The deviations would be important only were it possible to make measurements affected by the detailed shape of the velocity distribution curve.
Real coronae are summarized briefly in Section 9. While more and better observations are needed, it appears now that the hydrogen geocorona may become seriously perturbed into a geocoma, as Brandt labelled it, by solar particles flowing past the Earth. Attention is also directed to observations of the helium geocorona as a means of clarifying the now highly confused “helium problem”. Some estimates of the features of the Martian oxygen corona are made. Venus, as the Earth's sister planet, is an enigma, but coronal observations may point the way to an explanation of the distinctive differences between the evolution of the atmospheres of Venus and the Earth.
[1]
E. Opik.
The lunar atmosphere
,
1962
.
[2]
E. Öpik,et al.
Distribution of Density in a Planetary Exosphere
,
1959
.
[3]
T. Donahue,et al.
Distribution of hydrogen in the outer atmosphere
,
1963
.
[4]
D. R. Bates,et al.
Escape of helium
,
1959
.
[5]
F. S. Johnson.
The ion distribution above the F2 maximum
,
1960
.
[6]
T. Donahue.
Excitation of the Lyman-α in the night sky
,
1962
.
[7]
R. Tousey,et al.
The Profile of Solar Hydrogen-Lyman-α
,
1960
.
[8]
J. Brandt.
The Lyman-α Problem and the Geocoma Hypothesis
,
1962,
Nature.
[9]
F. S. Johnson,et al.
The Telluric Hydrogen Corona.
,
1960
.
[10]
J. Brandt.
Solar LYMAN-β Fluorescence Mechanism in the Upper Atmosphere.
,
1959
.
[11]
R. L. Smith,et al.
Properties of the outer ionosphere deduced from nose whistlers
,
1961
.
[12]
J. Mihalov,et al.
Accretion of solar wind to form a lunar atmosphere
,
1962
.
[13]
D. Hunten.
A study of sodium in twilight. I. Theory
,
1954
.
[14]
C. Shen.
An Analytic Solution for Density Distribution in a Planetary Exosphere
,
1963
.
[15]
DENSITY IN A SIMPLE MODEL OF THE EXOSPHERE
,
1962
.
[16]
D. Blackwell,et al.
The Nightglow Spectrum: II. Hα Radiation in the Night Sky
,
1962
.
[17]
G. Thomas,et al.
Lyman α scattering in the Earth's hydrogen geocorona: 2.
,
1963
.
[18]
J. W. Chamberlain.
Interplanetary Gas.II. Expansion of a Model Solar Corona.
,
1960
.
[19]
Lord Rayleigh,et al.
On the Physics of Media that are Composed of Free and Perfectly Elastic Molecules in a State of Motion
,
1892
.
[20]
S. Chapman.
Ionization above theF2-peak, as affected by the interplanetary gas
,
1962
.
[21]
Arc‐lengths along the lines of force of a magnetic dipole
,
1956
.
[22]
A. T. Wilson.
A proposed electrostatic acceleration mechanism in the upper atmosphere and its bearing on the helium problem
,
1962
.
[23]
D. R. Bates,et al.
An estimate of the temperature in the exosphere
,
1961
.
[24]
Density of Neutral Gas in a Planetary Exosphere
,
1960
.
[25]
W. B. Hanson.
Upper‐atmosphere helium ions
,
1962
.
[26]
M. Nicolet.
Helium, an important constituent in the lower exosphere
,
1961
.
[27]
I. Shklovsky.
On hydrogen emission in the night glow
,
1959
.
[28]
H. Friedman,et al.
Further comments on the role of secondary scattering in the Lyman-α problem
,
1962
.
[29]
J. E. Kupperian,et al.
Far ultra-violet radiation in the night sky
,
1959
.
[30]
J. Brandt.
Interplanetary Gas. VI. on Diffuse Extreme Ultraviolet Helium Radiation in the Night and Day Sky.
,
1961
.
[31]
D. R. Bates,et al.
Hydrogen atoms and ions in the thermosphere and exosphere
,
1961
.
[32]
F. S. Johnson.
THE DISTRIBUTION OF HYDROGEN IN THE TELLURIC HYDROGEN CORONA
,
1961
.
[33]
D. Morton.
Spectroscopic observations of the night sky in the extreme ultraviolet
,
1962
.
[34]
D. R. Bates,et al.
Helium ions in the upper atmosphere
,
1962
.
[35]
John C. Brandt,et al.
Interplanetary Gas. I. Hydrogen Radiation in the Night Sky.
,
1959
.
[36]
G. Kuiper.
The atmospheres of the earth and planets.
,
1952
.
[37]
S. R. Cook.
On the Escape of Gases from Planetary Atmospheres According to the Kinetic Theory
,
1900
.
[38]
S. Singer.
Structure of the Earth's Exosphere
,
1960
.
[39]
P. Damon,et al.
Inert gases and the evolution of the atmosphere
,
1958
.
[40]
H. Hinteregger.
Interplanetary Ionization by Solar Extreme Ultraviolet Radiation.
,
1960
.
[41]
J. Brandt.
INTERPLANETARY GAS. V. A HYDROGEN CLOUD OF TERRESTRIAL ORIGIN
,
1961
.
[42]
Wolfgang Priester,et al.
TIME-DEPENDENT STRUCTURE OF THE UPPER ATMOSPHERE
,
1962
.
[43]
J. W. Chamberlain.
Interplanetary Gas. III. a Hydrodynamic Model of the Corona.
,
1961
.
[44]
J. Brandt.
On the role of secondary scattering in the Lyman-α problem
,
1962
.
[45]
J. Herring,et al.
Density in a planetary exosphere
,
1961
.
[46]
W. F. Libby,et al.
Tritium and Helium-3 in Solar Flares and Loss of Helium from the Earth's Atmosphere
,
1962,
Science.
[47]
J. W. Chamberlain.
UPPER ATMOSPHERES OF THE PLANETS
,
1962
.
[48]
G. Thomas.
Lyman α scattering in the Earth's hydrogen geocorona: 1.
,
1963
.
[49]
J. Brandt.
Density of the Lunar Atmosphere
,
1960,
Science.
[50]
D. Morton,et al.
Observations of the extreme ultraviolet radiation in the night sky using an atomic hydrogen filter
,
1962
.