Knowledge Flow in Interdisciplinary Teams

Knowledge flow in interdisciplinary teams has become of particular interest as research and alliances cross traditional disciplinary boundaries, and as computing is applied in any domain. The problem is how to share and/or pool knowledge toward a common goal among people with diverse backgrounds. To understand the needs of such groups, it is important to find out what knowledge and learning flows form the basis of their relationships. To explore this, social network data were collected from members of three interdisciplinary teams about what they learned from their closest 5-8 co-workers, and what co-workers learned from them. Results show exchange of factual knowledge to be only one of a number of learning relations that support the teams. Other important relations include learning the process of doing something, information about methods, engaging jointly in research, learning about technology, generation of new ideas, socialization into the profession, access to a network of contacts, and administration work. Distributions of these relations are examined.

[1]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[2]  D. Wegner.  Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[3]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[4]  Leon Eisenberg,et al.  Bridging Disciplines in the Brain, Behavioral, and Clinical Sciences , 2000 .

[5]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[6]  Julie Thompson Klein,et al.  Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities , 1996 .

[7]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  Knowledge emergence : social, technical, and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation , 2001 .

[8]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Theories of Communication Networks , 2003 .

[9]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[10]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Measuring Tie Strength , 1984 .

[11]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[12]  Bertram C. Bruce,et al.  Modeling Distributed Knowledge Processes in Next Generation Multidisciplinary Alliances* , 2000, Proceedings Academia/Industry Working Conference on Research Challenges '00. Next Generation Enterprises: Virtual Organizations and Mobile/Pervasive Technologies. AIWORC'00. (Cat. No.PR00628).

[13]  Bertram C. Bruce,et al.  Modeling Distributed Knowledge Processes in Next Generation Multidisciplinary Alliances* , 2000, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[14]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[15]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[16]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[17]  B. Mullen,et al.  Theories of group behavior , 1987 .

[18]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  Collaborative learning and computer‐supported groups , 1999 .

[20]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[21]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  KDI INITIATIVE: MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATIONS , 2003 .

[22]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.