The UK’s Emissions and Employment Footprints: Exploring the Trade-Offs

During the last decades, the UK economy has increasingly relied on foreign markets to fulfil its material needs, becoming a net importer of both emissions and employment. While the emissions footprint reflects the pressure that consumption exerts on the planet’s climate, the labour footprint represents the employment that is created across the globe associated with the demand for products and services. This paper has a two-fold objective. First, it focuses on analysing the behaviour over time, drivers, and sectoral and regional composition of both UK’s footprints. Second, it explores the relationship between both measures by estimating the elasticity between the growth of emissions and employment embodied in imports. The results show that around half of the emissions associated with UK consumption were generated outside its borders, while only 40% of total employment was domestic. This has important policy implications. Reducing UK’s imports can contribute to cut both its footprints, generating less emissions abroad and more employment opportunities within. However, cutting imports is challenging, since this would require a lengthy and difficult process of structural transformation. The UK could contribute to curb emissions outside its borders, while safeguarding development overseas, by offering increased support to emission-intensive trade partners in the form of technology transfer and financial aid.

[1]  B. Butland,et al.  Glossary of statistical terms , 2021, Statistics at Square One.

[2]  Rural Affairs UK's Carbon Footprint , 2017 .

[3]  Marco Sakai,et al.  Energy consumption-based accounts : A comparison of results using different energy extension vectors , 2017 .

[4]  Lorenzo Ductor,et al.  The world trade network and the environment , 2015 .

[5]  J. Barrett,et al.  Reducing the Carbon Footprint and its Implications for Global Employment: The Labour Productivity of Carbon , 2015 .

[6]  Kate Scott,et al.  An integration of net imported emissions into climate change targets , 2015 .

[7]  D. Sakyi,et al.  Trade openness, income levels, and economic growth: The case of developing countries, 1970–2009 , 2015 .

[8]  Richard Wood,et al.  Labor Embodied in Trade , 2015 .

[9]  Bart Los,et al.  How Global are Global Value Chains? A New Approach to Measure International Fragmentation , 2015 .

[10]  R. Martin,et al.  Reindustrialising regions: rebuilding the manufacturing economy? , 2014 .

[11]  David Bailey,et al.  Manufacturing reshoring and its limits: the UK automotive case , 2014 .

[12]  Marcel P. Timmer,et al.  Slicing Up Global Value Chains , 2014 .

[13]  Ignazio Mongelli,et al.  The game of trading jobs for emissions , 2014 .

[14]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  The Employment Footprints of Nations , 2014 .

[15]  V. Andreoni,et al.  The Single Market as an Engine for Employment Through External Trade , 2013 .

[16]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Consumption-based GHG emission accounting: a UK case study , 2013 .

[17]  Bart Los,et al.  THE CONSTRUCTION OF WORLD INPUT–OUTPUT TABLES IN THE WIOD PROJECT , 2013 .

[18]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  BUILDING EORA: A GLOBAL MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT DATABASE AT HIGH COUNTRY AND SECTOR RESOLUTION , 2013 .

[19]  S. Giljum,et al.  Materials embodied in international trade – Global material extraction and consumption between 1995 and 2005 , 2012 .

[20]  Marco Sakai Sustainability: Limit consumption to preserve habitats , 2012, Nature.

[21]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations , 2012, Nature.

[22]  Umed Temurshoev,et al.  Input-output impact analysis in current or constant prices: does it matter? , 2012, Journal of economic structures.

[23]  Christine Rifflart,et al.  Who Produces for Whom in the World Economy? (Qui Produit Pour Qui Dans L’Économie Mondiale?) , 2011 .

[24]  Klaus Hubacek,et al.  A "carbonizing dragon": China's fast growing CO2 emissions revisited. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  C. Weber,et al.  Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008 , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  Policy Update: Managing carbon leakage , 2010 .

[27]  S. Davis,et al.  Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  T. Wiedmann A review of recent multi-region input–output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting , 2009 .

[29]  Christopher Kollmeyer Explaining Deindustrialization: How Affluence, Productivity Growth, and Globalization Diminish Manufacturing Employment1 , 2009, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change , 2008 .

[31]  Alan M. Taylor,et al.  Is the Washington Consensus Dead? Growth, Openness, and the Great Liberalization, 1970s–2000s , 2008, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[32]  G. Peters From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories , 2008 .

[33]  E. Hertwich,et al.  CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  Christopher Sutter,et al.  Does the current Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) deliver its sustainable development claim? An analysis of officially registered CDM projects , 2007 .

[35]  Marzio Galeotti,et al.  Reassessing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A robustness exercise , 2006 .

[36]  Norman V. Loayza,et al.  Openness Can Be Good for Growth: The Role of Policy Complementarities , 2005 .

[37]  Lucia Tajoli,et al.  Patterns of international fragmentation of production and the relative demand for labor , 2005 .

[38]  Soumyananda Dinda Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey , 2004 .

[39]  M. S. Taylor,et al.  Trade, Growth and the Environment , 2003 .

[40]  Rutger Hoekstra,et al.  Structural Decomposition Analysis of Physical Flows in the Economy , 2002 .

[41]  David L. Dollar,et al.  Trade, Growth, and Poverty , 2001 .

[42]  Jesper Munksgaard,et al.  CO2 accounts for open economies: producer or consumer responsibility? , 2001 .

[43]  Bart Los,et al.  Structural Decomposition Analyses with Dependent Determinants , 2000 .

[44]  D. Greenaway,et al.  An empirical assessment of the impact of trade on employment in the United Kingdom , 1999 .

[45]  Bart Los,et al.  Structural decomposition techniques : sense and sensitivity , 1998 .

[46]  Peter W. Wright,et al.  Trade with Low Wage Economies, Employment and Productivity in UK Manufacturing , 1998 .

[47]  Robert C. Feenstra,et al.  Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production in the Global Economy , 1998 .

[48]  S. Edwards Openness, Productivity and Growth: What Do We Really Know? , 1997 .

[49]  Adam Rose,et al.  INPUT-OUTPUT STRUCTURAL DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS: A CRITICAL APPRAISAL , 1996 .

[50]  Ann E. Harrison,et al.  Openness and Growth: A Time-Series, Cross-Country Analysis for Developing Countries , 1995 .

[51]  R. Feenstra,et al.  Trade and Uneven Growth , 1990 .

[52]  GUSTAVO MARTÍNEZ CABANAS,et al.  Prebisch, Raúl: The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems , 2019, Die 100 wichtigsten Werke der Ökonomie.

[53]  Thomas Wiedmann,et al.  Impacts Embodied in Global Trade Flows , 2016 .

[54]  Matthias Schroder,et al.  Input–Output Analysis , 2011 .

[55]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  International trade undermines national emission reduction targets: New evidence from air pollution , 2014 .

[56]  Martin Hess,et al.  Global production networks, labour and development , 2013 .

[57]  J. C. J. M. Bergh,et al.  Comparing structural decomposition analysis and index , 2003 .

[58]  A. Krueger,et al.  Trade Policy and Economic Development: How We Learn , 1997 .

[59]  Inge R∅pke Trade, development and sustainability — a critical assessment of the “free trade dogma” , 1994 .

[60]  Hans W. Singer,et al.  The Distribution of Gains between Investing and Borrowing Countries , 1975 .