Identifying Exoplanets with Deep Learning. II. Two New Super-Earths Uncovered by a Neural Network in K2 Data

For years, scientists have used data from NASA's Kepler Space Telescope to look for and discover thousands of transiting exoplanets. In its extended K2 mission, Kepler observed stars in various regions of sky all across the ecliptic plane, and therefore in different galactic environments. Astronomers want to learn how the population of exoplanets are different in these different environments. However, this requires an automatic and unbiased way to identify the exoplanets in these regions and rule out false positive signals that mimic transiting planet signals. We present a method for classifying these exoplanet signals using deep learning, a class of machine learning algorithms that have become popular in fields ranging from medical science to linguistics. We modified a neural network previously used to identify exoplanets in the Kepler field to be able to identify exoplanets in different K2 campaigns, which range in galactic environments. We train a convolutional neural network, called AstroNet-K2, to predict whether a given possible exoplanet signal is really caused by an exoplanet or a false positive. AstroNet-K2 is highly successful at classifying exoplanets and false positives, with accuracy of 98% on our test set. It is especially efficient at identifying and culling false positives, but for now, still needs human supervision to create a complete and reliable planet candidate sample. We use AstroNet-K2 to identify and validate two previously unknown exoplanets. Our method is a step towards automatically identifying new exoplanets in K2 data and learning how exoplanet populations depend on their galactic birthplace.

[1]  E. Agol,et al.  Analytic Light Curves for Planetary Transit Searches , 2002, astro-ph/0210099.

[2]  G. Kov'acs,et al.  A box-fitting algorithm in the search for periodic transits , 2002, astro-ph/0206099.

[3]  S. Seager,et al.  A Unique Solution of Planet and Star Parameters from an Extrasolar Planet Transit Light Curve , 2002, astro-ph/0206228.

[4]  M. Skrutskie,et al.  The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) , 2006 .

[5]  John D. Hunter,et al.  Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[6]  J. Bochanski,et al.  CONSTRAINING THE AGE–ACTIVITY RELATION FOR COOL STARS: THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY DATA RELEASE 5 LOW-MASS STAR SPECTROSCOPIC SAMPLE , 2007, 0712.1590.

[7]  Warren R. Brown,et al.  QATAR-2: A K DWARF ORBITED BY A TRANSITING HOT JUPITER AND A MORE MASSIVE COMPANION IN AN OUTER ORBIT , 2011, The Astrophysical Journal.

[8]  D. Ciardi,et al.  SPECKLE CAMERA OBSERVATIONS FOR THE NASA KEPLER MISSION FOLLOW-UP PROGRAM , 2011 .

[9]  T. Morton AN EFFICIENT AUTOMATED VALIDATION PROCEDURE FOR EXOPLANET TRANSIT CANDIDATES , 2012, 1206.1568.

[10]  J. B. Laird,et al.  An abundance of small exoplanets around stars with a wide range of metallicities , 2012, Nature.

[11]  D. Kipping Efficient, uninformative sampling of limb darkening coefficients for two-parameter laws , 2013, 1308.0009.

[12]  Paul M. Brunet,et al.  The Gaia mission , 2013, 1303.0303.

[13]  B. Gibson,et al.  Chemical gradients in the Milky Way from the RAVE data , 2013, 1309.4279.

[14]  Daniel Foreman-Mackey,et al.  emcee: The MCMC Hammer , 2012, 1202.3665.

[15]  L. Rogers MOST 1.6 EARTH-RADIUS PLANETS ARE NOT ROCKY , 2014, 1407.4457.

[16]  L. Buchhave,et al.  Three regimes of extrasolar planet radius inferred from host star metallicities , 2014, Nature.

[17]  P. Tenenbaum,et al.  AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF KEPLER PLANETARY TRANSIT CANDIDATES , 2014, 1408.1496.

[18]  F. Mullally,et al.  The K2 Mission: Characterization and Early Results , 2014, 1402.5163.

[19]  A. Vanderburg,et al.  A Technique for Extracting Highly Precise Photometry for the Two-Wheeled Kepler Mission , 2014, 1408.3853.

[20]  Travis E. Oliphant,et al.  Guide to NumPy , 2015 .

[21]  Laura Kreidberg,et al.  batman: BAsic Transit Model cAlculatioN in Python , 2015, 1507.08285.

[22]  Jason T. Wright,et al.  A disintegrating minor planet transiting a white dwarf , 2015, Nature.

[23]  P. Berlind,et al.  PLANETARY CANDIDATES FROM THE FIRST YEAR OF THE K2 MISSION , 2015, 1511.07820.

[24]  D. Charbonneau,et al.  THE OCCURRENCE OF POTENTIALLY HABITABLE PLANETS ORBITING M DWARFS ESTIMATED FROM THE FULL KEPLER DATASET AND AN EMPIRICAL MEASUREMENT OF THE DETECTION SENSITIVITY , 2015, 1501.01623.

[25]  Khadeejah A. Zamudio,et al.  PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER. VII. THE FIRST FULLY UNIFORM CATALOG BASED ON THE ENTIRE 48-MONTH DATA SET (Q1–Q17 DR24) , 2015, 1512.06149.

[26]  M. R. Haas,et al.  TERRESTRIAL PLANET OCCURRENCE RATES FOR THE KEPLER GK DWARF SAMPLE , 2015, 1506.04175.

[27]  M. R. Haas,et al.  A MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUE TO IDENTIFY TRANSIT SHAPED SIGNALS , 2015, 1509.00041.

[28]  M. Paegert,et al.  THE K2-ESPRINT PROJECT. I. DISCOVERY OF THE DISINTEGRATING ROCKY PLANET K2-22b WITH A COMETARY HEAD AND LEADING TAIL , 2015, 1504.04379.

[29]  Timothy D. Morton,et al.  VESPA: False positive probabilities calculator , 2015 .

[30]  M. R. Haas,et al.  FALSE POSITIVE PROBABILITIES FOR ALL KEPLER OBJECTS OF INTEREST: 1284 NEWLY VALIDATED PLANETS AND 428 LIKELY FALSE POSITIVES , 2016, 1605.02825.

[31]  Michael C. Liu,et al.  K2 DISCOVERS A BUSY BEE: AN UNUSUAL TRANSITING NEPTUNE FOUND IN THE BEEHIVE CLUSTER , 2016, 1608.04760.

[32]  Y. Alibert,et al.  PROBING TRAPPIST-1-LIKE SYSTEMS WITH K2 , 2016, 1606.08622.

[33]  Michael C. Liu,et al.  197 CANDIDATES AND 104 VALIDATED PLANETS IN K2's FIRST FIVE FIELDS , 2016, 1607.05263.

[34]  Gaia Collaboration,et al.  The Gaia mission , 2016, 1609.04153.

[35]  Marshall C. Johnson,et al.  ZODIACAL EXOPLANETS IN TIME (ZEIT). III. A SHORT-PERIOD PLANET ORBITING A PRE-MAIN-SEQUENCE STAR IN THE UPPER SCORPIUS OB ASSOCIATION , 2016, 1604.06165.

[36]  Kyle A. Pearson,et al.  Searching for exoplanets using artificial intelligence , 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[37]  M. Tamura,et al.  Three Small Planets Transiting a Hyades Star , 2017, 1710.07203.

[38]  David J Armstrong,et al.  Transit shapes and self-organizing maps as a tool for ranking planetary candidates: application to Kepler and K2 , 2016, 1611.01968.

[39]  J. Christiansen Planet Detection Metrics : Pixel-Level Transit Injection Tests of Pipeline Detection Efficiency for Data Release 25 KSCI-19110-001 , 2017 .

[40]  J. Coughlin Kepler Planet Detection Metrics: Robovetter Completeness and Effectiveness for Data Release 25 , 2017 .

[41]  G. Laughlin,et al.  Supervised Learning Detection of Sixty Non-transiting Hot Jupiter Candidates , 2017, 1706.06602.

[42]  Christopher J. Shallue,et al.  Identifying Exoplanets with Deep Learning: A Five-planet Resonant Chain around Kepler-80 and an Eighth Planet around Kepler-90 , 2017, 1712.05044.

[43]  Raja Giryes,et al.  Shallow Transits—Deep Learning. I. Feasibility Study of Deep Learning to Detect Periodic Transits of Exoplanets , 2017, 1711.03163.

[44]  F. J. Alonso-Floriano,et al.  Exoplanets around Low-mass Stars Unveiled by K2 , 2017, 1710.03239.

[45]  T. A. Lister,et al.  Gaia Data Release 2. Summary of the contents and survey properties , 2018, 1804.09365.

[46]  P. Berlind,et al.  Zodiacal Exoplanets in Time (ZEIT). VII. A Temperate Candidate Super-Earth in the Hyades Cluster , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.

[47]  David J Armstrong,et al.  Machine-learning approaches to exoplanet transit detection and candidate validation in wide-field ground-based surveys , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[48]  A. Vanderburg,et al.  Zodiacal Exoplanets in Time (ZEIT). VIII. A Two-planet System in Praesepe from K2 Campaign 16 , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.

[49]  Clea F. Schumer,et al.  275 Candidates and 149 Validated Planets Orbiting Bright Stars in K2 Campaigns 0–10 , 2018, 1802.05277.

[50]  Joseph E. Rodriguez,et al.  A Compact Multi-planet System with a Significantly Misaligned Ultra Short Period Planet , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.

[51]  David J Armstrong,et al.  Automatic vetting of planet candidates from ground based surveys: Machine learning with NGTS , 2018, 1805.07089.

[52]  Khadeejah A. Zamudio,et al.  Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler. VIII. A Fully Automated Catalog with Measured Completeness and Reliability Based on Data Release 25 , 2017, The Astrophysical journal. Supplement series.

[53]  M. Tamura,et al.  44 Validated Planets from K2 Campaign 10 , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.

[54]  V. V. Eylen,et al.  The occurrence of planets and other substellar bodies around white dwarfs using K2 , 2017, 1711.09691.

[55]  M. Tamura,et al.  Sixty Validated Planets from K2 Campaigns 5–8 , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.

[56]  M. Sasdelli,et al.  Scientific Domain Knowledge Improves Exoplanet Transit Classification with Deep Learning , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[57]  Chelsea X. Huang,et al.  TESS Discovery of a Transiting Super-Earth in the pi Mensae System , 2018, The astrophysical journal. Letters.

[58]  D. Gerdes,et al.  Transfer learning for galaxy morphology from one survey to another , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.