Manipulator system selection based on evaluation of task completion time and cost

Task completion time and cost are two significant criteria for the selection of manipulator system. For a given task, several Pareto solutions of manipulator systems should be derived based on the evaluation of these two criteria. However, this process requires a large calculation time. In this paper, we propose a method that can select appropriate systems by evaluating task completion time and cost within the desired calculation time. In the proposed method, multiple objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) is employed to search for appropriate manipulator systems from a set of candidate systems. Location optimization and motion coordination are integrated to derive the task completion time and the relative cost is used to evaluate the cost of a manipulator system. We employ particle swarm optimization (PSO) for location optimization and use nearest-neighborhood algorithm (NNA) for motion coordination, since PSO and NNA have a high speed of convergence to a good solution. The proposed method is applied to a set of tasks and is proved to be effective and practical.

[1]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple attribute decision making : an introduction , 1995 .

[2]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[3]  Nourredine Boubekri,et al.  Development of an expert system for industrial robot selection , 1991 .

[4]  Celik Parkan,et al.  Decision-making and performance measurement models with applications to robot selection , 1999 .

[5]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  OBBTree: a hierarchical structure for rapid interference detection , 1996, SIGGRAPH.

[6]  T. Chu,et al.  A Fuzzy TOPSIS Method for Robot Selection , 2003 .

[7]  G. Swaminathan Robot Motion Planning , 2006 .

[8]  Yue Shi,et al.  A modified particle swarm optimizer , 1998, 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98TH8360).

[9]  Bernard W. Taylor,et al.  A multi-criteria decision model for the selection of a computerized manufacturing control system , 1985 .

[10]  Kenji Inoue,et al.  Type selection of robot manipulators using fuzzy reasoning in robot design system , 1993, Proceedings of 1993 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS '93).

[11]  B. K. Lambert,et al.  Development of a computer aided robot selection procedure (CARSP) , 1987 .

[12]  Jun Ota,et al.  Coordinated motion control of a robot arm and a positioning table with arrangement of multiple goals , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  K. Knott,et al.  A model for evaluating alternative robot systems under uncertainty , 1982 .

[14]  Jun Ota,et al.  Hybrid design for multiple-goal task realization of robot arm with rotating table , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  A. P. Pashkevich,et al.  Multiobjective optimisation of robot location in a workcell using genetic algorithms , 1998 .

[16]  Celik Parkan,et al.  Process selection with multiple objective and subjective attributes , 1998 .

[17]  Moutaz Khouja,et al.  The use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection , 1995 .

[18]  Chon-Huat Goh,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process for robot selection , 1997 .

[19]  Y. A. Tung,et al.  A revised weighted sum decision model for robot selection , 1996 .

[20]  Rishi Kumar,et al.  Optimal selection of robots by using distance based approach method , 2010 .