Performance and suitability assessment of a real-time 3D electromagnetic needle tracking system for interstitial brachytherapy

Purpose Accurate insertion and overall needle positioning are key requirements for effective brachytherapy treatments. This work aims at demonstrating the accuracy performance and the suitability of the Aurora® V1 Planar Field Generator (PFG) electromagnetic tracking system (EMTS) for real-time treatment assistance in interstitial brachytherapy procedures. Material and methods The system's performance was characterized in two distinct studies. First, in an environment free of EM disturbance, the boundaries of the detection volume of the EMTS were characterized and a tracking error analysis was performed. Secondly, a distortion analysis was conducted as a means of assessing the tracking accuracy performance of the system in the presence of potential EM disturbance generated by the proximity of standard brachytherapy components. Results The tracking accuracy experiments showed that positional errors were typically 2 ± 1 mm in a zone restricted to the first 30 cm of the detection volume. However, at the edges of the detection volume, sensor position errors of up to 16 mm were recorded. On the other hand, orientation errors remained low at ± 2° for most of the measurements. The EM distortion analysis showed that the presence of typical brachytherapy components in vicinity of the EMTS had little influence on tracking accuracy. Position errors of less than 1 mm were recorded with all components except with a metallic arm support, which induced a mean absolute error of approximately 1.4 mm when located 10 cm away from the needle sensor. Conclusions The Aurora® V1 PFG EMTS possesses a great potential for real-time treatment assistance in general interstitial brachytherapy. In view of our experimental results, we however recommend that the needle axis remains as parallel as possible to the generator surface during treatment and that the tracking zone be restricted to the first 30 cm from the generator surface.

[1]  W. Richard Fright,et al.  The Effects of Metals and Interfering Fields on Electromagnetic Trackers , 1998, Presence.

[2]  Christopher Nafis,et al.  Method for evaluating compatibility of commercial electromagnetic (EM) microsensor tracking systems with surgical and imaging tables , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[3]  Wolfgang Birkfellner,et al.  Electromagnetic tracking for US-guided interventions: standardized assessment of a new compact field generator , 2012, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[4]  Emmanuel Racine,et al.  Fast, automatic, and accurate catheter reconstruction in HDR brachytherapy using an electromagnetic 3D tracking system. , 2014, Medical physics.

[5]  K. Cleary,et al.  Electromagnetic tracking for abdominal interventions in computer aided surgery , 2006, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[6]  A. M. Franz,et al.  Navigated targeting of liver lesions: pitfalls of electromagnetic tracking , 2012 .

[7]  Hermann J Müller,et al.  Electromagnetic tracking of motion in the proximity of computer generated graphical stimuli: A tutorial , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[8]  Andrew D. Wiles,et al.  Accuracy assessment protocols for elektromagnetic tracking systems , 2003, CARS.

[9]  Nikhil Kulkarni,et al.  Minimizing Electromagnetic Interference from Surgical Instruments on Electromagnetic Surgical Navigation , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  Thomas Langø,et al.  Accuracy of electromagnetic tracking with a prototype field generator in an interventional OR setting. , 2012, Medical physics.

[11]  Jackrit Suthakorn,et al.  Non-radiological colonoscope tracking image guided colonoscopy using commercially available electromagnetic tracking system , 2010, 2010 IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics.

[12]  K. Cleary,et al.  Image-guided interventions : technology and applications , 2008 .

[13]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  A hardware and software protocol for the evaluation of electromagnetic tracker accuracy in the clinical environment: a multi-center study , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[14]  Ziv Yaniv,et al.  Electromagnetic tracking in the clinical environment. , 2009, Medical physics.

[15]  Christian Schilling,et al.  Assesment of metallic distortions of an electromagnetic tracking system , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[16]  M. Baszyński,et al.  Electromagnetic navigation in medicine – basic issues, advantages and shortcomings, prospects of improvement , 2010 .

[17]  P. Hoskin,et al.  GEC/ESTRO recommendations on high dose rate afterloading brachytherapy for localised prostate cancer: an update. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[18]  Ehsan Dehghan,et al.  Electromagnetic tracking for catheter reconstruction in ultrasound-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy of the prostate. , 2014, Brachytherapy.

[19]  Peter Anderson,et al.  Method for estimating dynamic EM tracking accuracy of surgical navigation tools , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[20]  Levente Kovács,et al.  Repeatable assessment protocol for electromagnetic trackers , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[21]  A M Franz,et al.  Standardized assessment of new electromagnetic field generators in an interventional radiology setting. , 2012, Medical physics.

[22]  Volodymyr V. Kindratenko,et al.  A survey of electromagnetic position tracker calibration techniques , 2005, Virtual Reality.

[23]  M. Figl,et al.  Evaluation of a new electromagnetic tracking system using a standardized assessment protocol , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  R. Pötter,et al.  GEC/ESTRO-EAU recommendations on temporary brachytherapy using stepping sources for localised prostate cancer. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[25]  Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.  A novel fully automatic system for the evaluation of electromagnetic tracker , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[26]  Jochen Kruecker,et al.  Effects of sensor orientation on AC electromagnetic tracking system accuracy in a CT scanner environment , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[27]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Electromagnetic tracker accuracy in the CyberKnife suite , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[28]  Jun Zhou,et al.  Real-time catheter tracking for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy using an electromagnetic 3D-guidance device: a preliminary performance study. , 2013, Medical physics.

[29]  H. Meinzer,et al.  Effect of 3D ultrasound probes on the accuracy of electromagnetic tracking systems. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.