The Policy Implications of Differing Concepts of Risk

The author draws on the policy analysis literature to delineate the linkage between conceptualization of risk and the formulation and proposed solution of risk-related policy problems. Two concepts of risk are identified: (1) a concept of risk as a physically given attribute of hazardous technologies and (2) a concept of risk as a socially constructed attribute. The argument is advanced that the social construction of risk provides a firm, theoretical basis for the design of policy. The discussion links the perception, manage ment, and communication of risk to the more fundamental issue of the nature and role of science and technology.

[1]  Thomas E. Backer,et al.  Knowledge Utilization , 1991 .

[2]  Mary R. English.  Risk and Consent , 1991 .

[3]  Steve Rayner.  Muddling Through Metaphors to Maturity: A Commentary on Kasperson et al., The Social Amplification of Risk1 , 1988 .

[4]  Leah A. Lievrouw,et al.  Four programs of research in scientific communication , 1988 .

[5]  S. Rayner,et al.  How Fair Is Safe Enough? The Cultural Approach to Societal Technology Choice1 , 1987 .

[6]  D. Campbell.  Guidelines for Monitoring the Scientific Competence of Preventive Intervention Research Centers , 1987 .

[7]  B. Johnson,et al.  The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk , 1987 .

[8]  Detlof von Winterfeldt,et al.  Communicating Scientific Information About Health and Environmental Risks: Problems and Opportunities from a Social and Behavioral Perspective , 1987 .

[9]  Steve Rayner,et al.  Risk and Relativism in Science for Policy , 1987 .

[10]  P Slovic,et al.  Informing and educating the public about risk. , 1986, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  E. Rogers.  Communication Technology , 1986 .

[12]  R. Zimmerman.  The Management of Risk , 1986 .

[13]  Kristin Shrader-Frechette.  Risk-Cost-Benefit Methodology and Equal Protection , 1986 .

[14]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Three Types of Risk Assessment: A Methodological Analysis , 1985 .

[15]  M. Spangler.  Heuristic Opinion and Preference Evaluation Research for Assessing Technological Options—A User’s View , 1985 .

[16]  T. Earle,et al.  Risk Judgment and the Communication of Hazard Information: Toward a New Look in the Study of Risk Perception , 1985 .

[17]  Steve Rayner,et al.  Disagreeing about risk: the institutional cultures of risk management and planning for future generations , 1984 .

[18]  P. Thompson,et al.  Situation Specific Indicators for Distinguishing Between High Consequence/Low-Probability Risk and Low-Consequence/High-Probability Risk , 1984 .

[19]  Michael Elliott,et al.  Improving Community Acceptance of Hazardous Waste Facilities Through Alternative Systems for Mitigating and Managing Risk , 1984 .

[20]  W. E. Vesely.  Robust Risk Analysis: The Need for it in Nuclear Probabilistic Risk Evaluations , 1984 .

[21]  R. Kates,et al.  Comparative risk analysis of technological hazards (a review). , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  M. Douglas,et al.  Risk and Culture , 1983 .

[23]  Division on Earth.  Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process , 1983 .

[24]  B. Wynne.  Redefining the issues of risk and public acceptance: The social viability of technology , 1983 .

[25]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  “The Public” Vs. “The Experts”: Perceived Vs. Actual Disagreements About Risks of Nuclear Power , 1983 .

[26]  H. Otway,et al.  Reflections on Risk Perception and Policy1,2 , 1982 .

[27]  Douglas MacLean,et al.  Risk and Consent: Philosophical Issues for Centralized Decisions , 1982 .

[28]  William N. Dunn,et al.  Reforms as A rguments , 1982 .

[29]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Perceived risk: psychological factors and social implications , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[30]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research , 1980 .

[31]  W. C. Clark,et al.  Witches, Floods, and Wonder Drugs: Historical Perspectives on Risk Management , 1980 .

[32]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Informing people about risk , 1980 .

[33]  R. Schwing,et al.  Societal Risk Assessment , 1980 .

[34]  B. Cohen.  Society's valuation of life saving in radiation protection and other contexts. , 1980, Health physics.

[35]  Burkart Holzner,et al.  Knowledge in Use , 1979 .

[36]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Informed consent in societal risk—Benefit decisions , 1979 .

[37]  Dorothy Nelkin,et al.  Controversy: Politics of Technical Decisions , 1979 .

[38]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Rating the Risks , 1979 .

[39]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Behavioral Decision Theory , 1977 .

[40]  W. Lowrance,et al.  Of Acceptable Risk: Science and the Determination of Safety , 1976 .

[41]  J. W. Bryant,et al.  Redesigning the Future: A Systems Approach to Societal Problems , 1976 .

[42]  J. Habermas,et al.  Knowledge and Human Interests. , 1973 .

[43]  A M Weinberg,et al.  Science and trans-science , 1972, Science.

[44]  J. Ravetz.  Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems , 2020 .