Why Don't Issuers Get Upset About Leaving Money on the Table in Ipos?

One of the puzzles regarding initial public offerings (IPOs) is that issuers rarely get upset about leaving substantial amounts of money on the table, defined as the number of shares sold times the difference between the first-day closing market price and the offer price. The average IPO leaves $9.1 million on the table. This number is approximately twice as large as the fees paid to investment bankers and represents a substantial indirect cost to the issuing firm. We present a prospect theory model that focuses on the covariance of the money left on the table and wealth changes. Our reasoning also provides an explanation for a second puzzling pattern: much more money is left on the table following recent market rises than after market falls. This results in an explanation of hot issue markets. We also offer a new explanation for why IPOs are underpriced. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.

[1]  I. Welch.  Sequential Sales, Learning, and Cascades , 1992 .

[2]  Kent L. Womack,et al.  Why Do Firms Switch Underwriters? , 2001 .

[3]  Michelle Lowry,et al.  IPO Market Cycles: Bubbles or Sequential Learning? , 2000 .

[4]  Kent L. Womack,et al.  The Persistence of IPO Mispricing and the Predictive Power of Flipping , 1999 .

[5]  T H Alt,et al.  A hot issue. , 1979, The Journal of dermatologic surgery and oncology.

[6]  Randolph P. Beatty,et al.  INVESTMENT BANKING, REPUTATION, AND THE UNDERPRICING OF INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS* , 1986 .

[7]  Alexander Ljungqvist,et al.  Going Public: The Theory and Evidence on How Companies Raise Equity Finance , 2001 .

[8]  P. Spindt,et al.  How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issues , 1989 .

[9]  K. Hanley,et al.  Price stabilization in the market for new issues , 1993 .

[10]  G. Schwert,et al.  IPO Market Cycles: An Exploratory Investigation , 2000 .

[11]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[12]  Hersh Shefrin,et al.  Explaining investor preference for cash dividends , 1984 .

[13]  J. Ritter,et al.  The Seven Percent Solution , 2000 .

[14]  G. Mandelker,et al.  Investment Banking: An Economic Analysis of Optimal Underwriting Contracts , 1977 .

[15]  J. Ritter.  The Long-Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings , 1991 .

[16]  Roger G. Ibbotson,et al.  "Hot Issue" Markets , 1975 .

[17]  Xiaoyun Yu,et al.  Evidence of Information Spillovers in the Production of Investment Banking Services , 2001 .

[18]  Louis K.C. Chan,et al.  Robust Measurement of Beta Risk , 1992, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[19]  Reena Aggarwal.  Stabilization Activities by Underwriters after Initial Public Offerings , 2000 .

[20]  Michel A. Habib,et al.  Underpricing and Entrepreneurial Wealth Losses in Ipos:Theory and Evidence , 2001 .

[21]  Dennis E. Logue,et al.  ON THE PRICING OF UNSEASONED EQUITY ISSUES: 1965-1969 , 1973 .

[22]  Kirt C. Butler,et al.  Nonsynchronous Security Trading and Market Index Autocorrelation , 1987 .

[23]  Peter M. Clarkson,et al.  Empirical Estimates of Beta When Investors Face Estimation Risk , 1990 .

[24]  Haluk Unal,et al.  Issue Size Choice and “Underpricing” in Thrift Mutual‐to‐Stock Conversions , 1993 .

[25]  Craig G. Dunbar,et al.  Factors Affecting Investment Bank Initial Public Offering Market Share , 1997 .

[26]  Roger G. Ibbotson,et al.  THE MARKET'S PROBLEMS WITH THE PRICING OF INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS , 1994 .

[27]  David P. Baron,et al.  A Model of the Demand for Investment Banking Advising and Distribution Services for New Issues , 1982 .

[28]  K. Hanley,et al.  The underpricing of initial public offerings and the partial adjustment phenomenon , 1993 .

[29]  H. White.  A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[30]  R. Thaler.  Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[31]  C. B. Barry.  Initial Public Offering Underpricing: The Issuer's View--A Comment , 1989 .