Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity.

UNLABELLED The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure was developed to evaluate disability and symptoms in single or multiple disorders of the upper limb at one point or at many points in time. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the DASH in a group of diverse patients and to compare the results with those obtained with joint-specific measures. METHODS Two hundred patients with either wrist/hand or shoulder problems were evaluated by use of questionnaires before treatment, and 172 (86%) were re-evaluated 12 weeks after treatment. Eighty-six patients also completed a test-retest questionnaire three to five days after the initial (baseline) evaluation. The questionnaire package included the DASH, the Brigham (carpal tunnel) questionnaire, the SPADI (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index), and other markers of pain and function. Correlations or t-tests between the DASH and the other measures were used to assess construct validity. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and other summary statistics. Responsiveness was described using standardized response means, receiver operating characteristics curves, and correlations between change in DASH score and change in scores of other measures. Standard response means were used to compare DASH responsiveness with that of the Brigham questionnaire and the SPADI in each region. RESULTS The DASH was found to correlate with other measures (r > 0.69) and to discriminate well, for example, between patients who were working and those who were not (p<0.0001). Test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.96) exceeded guidelines. The responsiveness of the DASH (to self-rated or expected change) was comparable with or better than that of the joint-specific measures in the whole group and in each region. CONCLUSIONS Evidence was provided of the validity, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness of the DASH. This study also demonstrated that the DASH had validity and responsiveness in both proximal and distal disorders, confirming its usefulness across the whole extremity.

[1]  M. Dougados,et al.  Assessing smallest detectable change over time in continuous structural outcome measures: application to radiological change in knee osteoarthritis. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  R H Gelberman,et al.  Responsiveness of Self‐Reported and Objective Measures of Disease Severity in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome , 1994, Medical care.

[3]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Evaluating changes in health status: reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. , 1993, JAMA.

[5]  A. Jette,et al.  Physical disablement concepts for physical therapy research and practice. , 1994, Physical therapy.

[6]  W. Tierney,et al.  Further evidence supporting an SEM-based criterion for identifying meaningful intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Patients' memories of painful medical treatments: real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures , 1996, Pain.

[8]  J. Wright,et al.  The minimal important difference: who's to say what is important? , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  K N Lohr,et al.  Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria. , 1996, Clinical therapeutics.

[10]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  J. Fleiss.  The design and analysis of clinical experiments , 1987 .

[12]  James G Wright,et al.  Measuring disability of the upper extremity: a rationale supporting the use of a regional outcome measure. , 1999, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[13]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head) , 1996 .

[14]  N. Lurie,et al.  Measuring Health Changes Among Severely III Patients: The Floor Phenomenon , 1990, Medical care.

[15]  N. Jacobson,et al.  Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance , 1984 .

[16]  Introduction to symposium on the challenge of response shift in social science and medicine (editorial) , 1999 .

[17]  C. Bombardier,et al.  A taxonomy for responsiveness. , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  D L Riddle,et al.  Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. , 1996, Physical therapy.

[19]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials , 1982 .

[20]  George S. Howard,et al.  Response-shift bias: A source of contamination of self-report measures. , 1979 .

[21]  L. D. de Witte,et al.  Assessing the responsiveness of a functional status measure: the Sickness Impact Profile versus the SIP68. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  C. Ewan,et al.  Pilgrimage of pain: the illness experiences of women with repetition strain injury and the search for credibility. , 1991, Social science & medicine.

[23]  M. Sprangers,et al.  Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[24]  R. Richards,et al.  Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires. , 1998, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[25]  S. Heald,et al.  The shoulder pain and disability index: the construct validity and responsiveness of a region-specific disability measure. , 1997, Physical therapy.

[26]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. XII. How to use articles about health-related quality of life. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1997, JAMA.

[27]  R A Deyo,et al.  Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. , 1991, Controlled clinical trials.

[28]  R A Deyo,et al.  Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. , 1986, Journal of chronic diseases.

[29]  P. Dolan,et al.  The effect of past and present illness experience on the valuations of health states. , 1995, Medical care.

[30]  Clinically significant change: Jacobson and Truax (1991) revisited. , 1992 .

[31]  B. Cole.  Physical Rehabilitation: Outcome Measures , 1994 .

[32]  J. Macdermid,et al.  Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[33]  P. Stratford,et al.  Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris questionnaire. , 1996, Physical therapy.

[34]  Lewis E. Kazis,et al.  Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status , 1989, Medical care.

[35]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Measuring health status: what are the necessary measurement properties? , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[36]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Clinimetric and psychometric strategies for development of a health measurement scale. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[37]  Jorge L. Mendoza,et al.  A method of assessing change in a single subject: An alteration of the RC index , 1986 .

[38]  M. Ross.  Relation of Implicit Theories to the Construction of Personal Histories , 1989 .

[39]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[40]  M. Liang,et al.  Comparisons of Five Health Status Instruments for Orthopedic Evaluation , 1990, Medical care.

[41]  Bernard R. Rosner,et al.  Fundamentals of Biostatistics. , 1992 .

[42]  M. Liang,et al.  Comparative Measurement Sensitivity of Short and Longer Health Status Instruments , 1992, Medical care.

[43]  C. Bombardier,et al.  "Are you better?" A qualitative study of the meaning of recovery. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[44]  M. Charlson,et al.  Does recollection error threaten the validity of cross-sectional studies of effectiveness? , 1995, Medical care.

[45]  R. Devellis.  A consumer's guide to finding, evaluating, and reporting on measurement instruments. , 1996, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[46]  A M Jette,et al.  The disablement process. , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[47]  J. Katz,et al.  A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[48]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  INTERPRETING THE MEASUREMENT OF CHANGE IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH1 , 1979 .

[49]  Ron D. Hays,et al.  Quality of life assessment in clinical trials : methods and practice , 1998 .

[50]  W M Tierney,et al.  Linking clinical relevance and statistical significance in evaluating intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. , 1999, Medical care.

[51]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Review of applicability of existing functional status measures to the study of workers with musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper limb. , 1996, American journal of industrial medicine.

[52]  N. Bellamy,et al.  Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. , 2000, The Journal of hand surgery.

[53]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[54]  J M Smith,et al.  Upper limb work-related musculoskeletal disorders among newspaper employees: cross-sectional survey results. , 1997, American journal of industrial medicine.

[55]  D. Simel,et al.  Measuring shoulder function with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. , 1995, The Journal of rheumatology.

[56]  Paul W. Brand,et al.  Clinical mechanics of the hand , 1985 .

[57]  A. Kirkley,et al.  The Development and Evaluation of a Disease-Specific Quality of Life Measurement Tool for Shoulder Instability , 1998, The American journal of sports medicine.

[58]  D. Beaton,et al.  Validity of Observer-Based Aggregate Scoring Systems as Descriptors of Elbow Pain, Function, and Disability* , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[59]  D. Redelmeier,et al.  Assessing the clinical importance of symptomatic improvements. An illustration in rheumatology. , 1993, Archives of internal medicine.

[60]  D. Locker,et al.  Quality of life: a dynamic construct. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[61]  J. Wright,et al.  A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[62]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Assessing the minimal important difference in symptoms: a comparison of two techniques. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[63]  J. Macdermid,et al.  Development of a scale for patient rating of wrist pain and disability. , 1996, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[64]  John E. Ware,et al.  SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales : a user's manual , 1994 .

[65]  F J Ascione,et al.  Exploring the Iceberg: Common Symptoms and How People Care for Them , 1987, Medical care.

[66]  M. Shaul.  From early twinges to mastery: the process of adjustment in living with rheumatoid arthritis. , 1995, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[67]  K. Roach,et al.  Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. , 1991, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[68]  N. Jacobson,et al.  Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[69]  Geoffrey R. Norman,et al.  Biostatistics: The Bare Essentials , 1993 .

[70]  D. Herrmann.  Reporting current, past, and changed health status. What we know about distortion. , 1995, Medical care.

[71]  N. Jacobson,et al.  Methods for defining and determining the clinical significance of treatment effects: description, application, and alternatives. , 1999, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[72]  Johan Hoogstraten,et al.  Pretesting effects in retrospective pretest posttest designs. , 1989 .

[73]  J. Katz,et al.  Symptoms, functional status, and neuromuscular impairment following carpal tunnel release. , 1995, The Journal of hand surgery.

[74]  F. Gibbons,et al.  Social comparison as a mediator of response shift. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[75]  D A Bloch,et al.  Capturing the patient's view of change as a clinical outcome measure. , 1999, JAMA.