A Computer-Assisted Collaborative Reading Model to Improve Reading Fluency of EFL Learners in Continuous Learning Programs in Saudi Universities

Reading is not synonymous to comprehension; rather it is a prerequisite that doesn’t, by itself, guarantee comprehension. This is to say that being efficient in decoding letters, syllables and whole words and recognizing vocabulary does not ensure natural r automatic comprehension. Fluency seems to be the bridge between the mastery of the mechanics of reading and the dynamics of comprehension. Abundant research exists that explores how to improve reading skills of EFL learners at Saudi universities. However little, if any, of this array of research sought to discern the potential effects of educational technology on the fluency of struggling readers in continuous learning programs. To fill this gap, this study seeks to probe the multi dimensions of the problem and suggest ways to solve it. For this purpose, 24 EFL lecturers from three Saudi universities were selected and interviewed. A suggested computer-assisted collaborative reading model was put forth to be applied in the three universities. Students were diagnosed by their instructors as gaining relatively enough grasp of decoding skills at the multilevels of orthographic knowledge, mono and polysyllabic words, but exhibit slow and inaccurate reading indicating reprehensive symptoms for a fluency problem. The lecturers explained that the disappointment resulting from learners’ inability to reach comprehension despite mastering decoding skills influences their attitudes towards reading and language learning, bringing about reading apathy and low self-esteem. The proposed model is designed to enhance reading fluency which is perceived as the underlying problem that makes the reader struggle. It is to be delivered partly individually and partly collaboratively online. Collaboration also is operated via face to face instruction especially in teaching the reading strategy. In doing so, the procedures followed are in line with the blended learning. The findings indicate clearly that the proposed model was successfully used to improve reading fluency through accelerating the different reading subskills for decoding and create positive attitudes toward reading. The results highlight the importance of establishing a level of automaticity that gives rise to the higher skills of comprehension. Keywords—Collaborative reading model; computer-assisted language learning (CALL); computer-based instruction; EFL learners; fluency; Saudi Universities; struggling readers

[1]  Elham Mahmoudi,et al.  Attitude and Students’ Performance in Computer Assisted English Language Learning (CAELL) for Learning Vocabulary☆ , 2012 .

[2]  Kijpokin Kasemsap Foreign Language Learning: CALL, MALL, and Social Media Perspectives , 2017 .

[3]  Wan Ng,et al.  New Digital Technology in Education: Conceptualizing Professional Learning for Educators , 2015 .

[4]  Syed Md. Golam Faruk,et al.  English Language Teaching in Saudi Arabia-A World System Perspective , 2013 .

[5]  Gülcan Erçetin,et al.  Effects of Working Memory and Gloss Type on L2 Text Comprehension and Incidental Vocabulary Learning in Computer-Based Reading , 2016 .

[6]  Abdulaziz Abdulrahman Abanomey Do EFL Saudi learners perform differently with online reading? An exploratory study , 2013 .

[7]  Graham Davies,et al.  Computers, Language and Language Learning , 1983 .

[8]  Paige C. Pullen,et al.  The Complex Nature of Reading Fluency: A Multidimensional View , 2008 .

[9]  A. E-H W A K I M,et al.  Improving the Reading Comprehension of Middle School Students With Disabilities Through Computer-Assisted Collaborative Strategic Reading , 2006 .

[10]  Hamza Alshenqeeti,et al.  Effects of Task Repetition on Saudi EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension , 2020, Arab World English Journal.

[11]  M. Alshahrani A Brief Historical Perspective of English in Saudi Arabia , 2016 .

[12]  Alan E. Farstrup,et al.  What Research Has to Say About Fluency Instruction , 2002 .

[13]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .

[14]  Maryanne Wolf,et al.  Reading Fluency and Its Intervention , 2001 .

[15]  Hiroaki Ogata,et al.  Computer supported ubiquitous learning environment for vocabulary learning , 2010, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[16]  Nina Vyatkina,et al.  Technologies for Teaching and Learning L2 Grammar , 2017 .

[17]  Michelle K. Hosp,et al.  Oral Reading Fluency as an Indicator of Reading Competence: A Theoretical, Empirical, and Historical Analysis , 2001 .

[18]  Margrit Schreier,et al.  Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice , 2012 .

[19]  Bader Alharbi The Impact of Glossed Texts on Reading Comprehension among Tertiary Saudi Students , 2018 .

[20]  R. Alshammari,et al.  Using WhatsApp in EFL Instruction with Saudi Arabian University Students , 2017 .

[21]  Tanya Gupta A Study of Problem Solving Strategies Using ATLAS.ti , 2017 .

[22]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[23]  Maryellen Weimer,et al.  Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice , 2013 .

[24]  Ainol Haryati Ibrahim,et al.  Evaluating The Efficacy Of Active Reading Software In Enhancing EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension Skills , 2019 .

[25]  Susanne Friese,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis with ATLAS.ti , 2012 .

[26]  T. Rasinski,et al.  Perceptions of Turkish Parents with Children Identified as Dyslexic About the Problems that they and Their Children Experience , 2012 .

[27]  The Effectiveness of Reading Techniques Used in a Saudi Arabian Secondary School Classroom as Perceived by Students and Teachers: A Study of Methods Used in Teaching English and their Effectiveness , 2014 .

[28]  Camilla Vásquez,et al.  Web 2.0 and Second Language Learning: What Does the Research Tell Us? , 2012 .

[29]  C. Larenas,et al.  A Case Study on EFL Teachers’ Beliefs About the Teaching and Learning of English in Public Education , 2015 .

[30]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  A mobile-device-supported peer-assisted learning system for collaborative early EFL reading , 2007 .

[31]  R. Al-Shorman,et al.  Saudi EFL students’ reading interests , 2011 .

[32]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[33]  Y. Kim Developmental, Component-Based Model of Reading Fluency: An Investigation of Predictors of Word-Reading Fluency, Text-Reading Fluency, and Reading Comprehension. , 2015, Reading research quarterly.

[34]  S. Samuels Toward a Model of Reading Fluency. , 2006 .

[35]  Muhammed Salim Keezhatta,et al.  Enhancing Reading Skills for Saudi Secondary School Students through Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL): An Experimental Study , 2019, International Journal of English Linguistics.

[36]  David D. Paige,et al.  Impact of Classroom-Based Fluency Instruction on Grade One Students in an Urban Elementary School , 2020 .

[37]  George M. Jacobs,et al.  Cooperative Learning and Second Language Teaching , 2006 .

[38]  M. Warschauer,et al.  Computers and language learning: an overview , 1998, Language Teaching.

[39]  M. Ali Reading in a foreign language : effectiveness of computer-based reading instruction in comparison to teacher-based reading instruction , 2004 .

[40]  K. Seo Using Social Media Effectively in the Classroom: Blogs, Wikis, Twitter, and More , 2012 .

[41]  Abdulaziz Al-Qahtani Why Do Saudi EFL Readers Exhibit Poor Reading Abilities , 2016 .

[42]  R. Porter,et al.  Conducting qualitative research in mental health: Thematic and content analyses , 2015, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[43]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Experimentalized CALL for adult second language learners , 2013 .

[44]  Amjjad Sulaimani Teaching and learning in Saudi Arabia: perspectives from higher education , 2016 .

[45]  Pierfranca Forchini,et al.  CALL Essentials: Principles and Practice in CALL Classrooms. , 2005 .

[46]  Ken Beatty,et al.  Teaching & Researching: Computer-Assisted Language Learning , 2013 .

[47]  Nicholas H. Woolf,et al.  Qualitative Analysis Using ATLAS.ti: The Five-Level QDA™ Method , 2017 .

[48]  Lesley Shield,et al.  An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction , 2008, ReCALL.

[49]  Waqar Ahmad,et al.  Effect of Technology Enhanced Language Learning on Vocabulary Acquisition of EFL Learners , 2017 .

[50]  Philip Hubbard,et al.  Educating the CALL specialist , 2009 .

[51]  Haslinda Hassan,et al.  Use of Social Media for Informal Language Learning by Malaysian University Students , 2019 .

[52]  Chih-Ming Chen,et al.  A web-based collaborative reading annotation system with gamification mechanisms to improve reading performance , 2020, Comput. Educ..

[53]  Mar Gutiérrez-Colón,et al.  Mobile-assisted Language learning to enhance L2 reading comprehension: a selection of implementation studies between 2012–2017 , 2020, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[54]  Jacques de Lima Ferreira,et al.  Continuing Education for Professional Development in Higher Education Teaching , 2016 .

[55]  Y.-J. Shao,et al.  Computer-supported Collaborative Learning for Elementary School Students on the Effectiveness of Reading Comprehension , 2011, ICCE 2011.