A framework for including enhanced exposure to naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) in LCA

PurposeDespite advances in the development of impact categories for ionising radiation, the focus on artificial radionuclides produced in the nuclear fuel cycle means that the potential impacts resulting from increased exposure to naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) are still only covered to a limited degree in life cycle assessment (LCA). Here, we present a potential framework for the inclusion of the exposure routes and impact pathways particular to NORM in LCA.MethodsWe assess the potential magnitude of enhanced NORM exposure, particularly in light of the potential use of NORM residues in building materials, and set out the potential exposure routes that may exist. We then assess the current state of the art, in terms of available fate, exposure and damage models, both within and outside of the LCA sphere. Finally, these exposure routes and modelling techniques are combined in order to lay out a potential framework for NORM assessment in LCA, both in terms of impact on humans and ecosystems.Results and discussionIncreased exposure to NORM radionuclides can result either from their release to the environment or their proximity to humans as they reside in stockpiles, landfills or products. The exposure route via products is considered to be increasingly significant in light of current attempts to incorporate technologically enhanced NORMs (TENORM) including bauxite residue into building materials, by groups such as the ETN-MSCA REDMUD project. Impact assessment models for NORM exposure are therefore required to avoid potential burden shifting in the assessment of such TENORM products. Models describing the fate of environmental releases, the exhalation of radon from building products and the shielding effects on landfills/stockpiles are required to assess potential exposure. Subsequently, models relating exposure to radiation sources and the effective internal and external dose received by receptors are required. Finally, an assessment of the damage caused to the receptors is desirable.ConclusionsA sufficient suite of currently existing and internationally recognised models exist that can, with varying degrees of modification, form the building blocks of a comprehensive NORM characterisation method for LCA. The challenge ahead lies in consolidating these models, from disparate fields, into a coherent and generally applicable method for the assessment of enhanced NORM exposure in LCA.

[1]  G. Dóka,et al.  Waste Treatment and Assessment of Long-Term Emissions (8pp) , 2005 .

[2]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  A framework for deciding on the inclusion of emerging impacts in life cycle impact assessment , 2014 .

[3]  Rolf Frischknecht,et al.  Human health damages due to ionising radiation in life cycle impact assessment , 2000 .

[4]  Yiannis Pontikes,et al.  New perspectives and issues arising from the introduction of NORM residues in building materials , 2012 .

[5]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Human Health Damages due to Indoor Sources of Organic Compounds and Radioactivity in Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Dwellings - Part 1: Characterisation Factors (8 pp) , 2005 .

[6]  M. Markkanen,et al.  Radiation Dose Assessments for Materials with Elevated Natural Radioactivity , 1995 .

[7]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Integrating Human Indoor Air Pollutant Exposure within Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  A flexible matrix algebra framework for the multimedia multipathway modeling of emission to impacts. , 2007, Environment international.

[9]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[10]  C. H. Clement,et al.  Environmental protection : the concept and use of reference animals and plants , 2009 .

[11]  D Copplestone,et al.  The ERICA Tool. , 2008, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[12]  M. Batayneh,et al.  Use of selected waste materials in concrete mixes. , 2007, Waste management.

[13]  A Michael Donoghue,et al.  Radiological assessment for bauxite mining and alumina refining. , 2013, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[14]  Patrick Hofstetter,et al.  Why and how should we assess occupational health impacts in integrated product policy? , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  M. J. Goedkoop The Eco-Indicator 98 Explained , 1998 .

[16]  C Nuccetelli,et al.  Radioactivity in building materials: room model analysis and experimental methods. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  Rahul V. Ralegaonkar,et al.  Development of sustainable construction material using industrial and agricultural solid waste: A review of waste-create bricks , 2011 .

[18]  J.S.J. van Deventer,et al.  The potential use of geopolymeric materials to immobilise toxic metals: Part I. Theory and applications☆ , 1997 .

[19]  L. Koblinger,et al.  Mathematical Models of External Gamma Radiation and Congruence of Measurements , 1984 .

[20]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Confronting workplace exposure to chemicals with LCA: examples of trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene in metal degreasing and dry cleaning. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Indoor exposure to toluene from printed matter matters: complementary views from life cycle assessment and risk assessment. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[23]  Martin W. Holdgate A perspective of environmental pollution , 1979 .

[24]  C Nuccetelli,et al.  Natural radioactivity in building materials in the European Union: a database and an estimate of radiological significance. , 2012, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[25]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  A Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment and ranking method for liquid radioactive and chemical mixtures released by nuclear facilities under normal operating conditions , 2009 .

[26]  Yasunori Kikuchi,et al.  Local risks and global impacts considering plant-specific functions and constraints: a case study of metal parts cleaning , 2009 .

[27]  Yunliang Zhao,et al.  Preparation of eco-friendly construction bricks from hematite tailings , 2011 .

[28]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Environmental assessment of products volume 1: Methodology, tools, and case studies in product , 1997 .

[29]  D Copplestone,et al.  The development and purpose of the FREDERICA radiation effects database. , 2008, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[30]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[31]  ICRP Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Addendum 3 to ICRP Publication 53. ICRP Publication 106. Approved by the Commission in October 2007. , 2008, Annals of the ICRP.

[32]  Adrian K. Dixon,et al.  Benefits and costs, an eternal balance , 2007 .

[33]  R. Vetter ICRP Publication 103, The Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection , 2008 .

[34]  S. Uchida,et al.  Revision of the IAEA Technical Reports Series No. 364 [Handbook of parameter values for the prediction of radionuclide transfer in temperate environments] in IAEA/EMRAS Programme , 2008 .

[35]  Icrp Chapters 3 and 4 , 2007 .

[36]  Nations United sources and effects of ionizing radiation , 2000 .

[37]  Saeed Ahmari,et al.  Production of eco-friendly bricks from copper mine tailings through geopolymerization , 2012 .

[38]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Human Health Damages due to Indoor Sources of Organic Compounds and Radioactivity in Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Dwellings - Part 2: Damage Scores (10 pp) , 2005 .