Impact of transradial and transfemoral coronary interventions on bleeding and net adverse clinical events in acute coronary syndromes.

AIMS The aim of the present study was to examine the impact of the transradial approach (TRA), in comparison to the transfemoral approach (TFA), on PCI-related bleeding and patient outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients who underwent PCI in the OASIS-5 trial. METHODS AND RESULTS The primary outcome (death, myocardial infarction, refractory ischaemia) at nine days was similar in both groups (7.1% in 872 TRA and 7.7% in 7,013 TFA). Major bleeding was significantly lower in patients who underwent PCI with TRA by comparison to TFA (1.6% vs 3.5%, p<0.003, respectively). No difference between patients treated by fondaparinux or enoxaparin was noted for ischaemic events at nine days according to the access site. The rate of major bleeding at nine days was markedly reduced with fondaparinux when compared to enoxaparin for both access sites (from 4.8% to 2.3%, HR 0.48 [0.37-0.62], p< 0.0001 for TFA and from 2.4 to 0.9%, HR 0.36 [0.11- 1.16], p<0.08 for TRA). CONCLUSIONS TRA is associated with substantial decrease of PCI-related bleeding in current contemporary pharmacological environment in comparison to TFA. Even in the context of low access site complication rate provided by TRA, fondaparinux was effective in reducing major bleeding.

[1]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Design and rationale of the radial versus femoral access for coronary intervention (RIVAL) trial: a randomized comparison of radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2011, American heart journal.

[2]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Low-dose vs standard-dose unfractionated heparin for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes treated with fondaparinux: the FUTURA/OASIS-8 randomized trial. , 2010, JAMA.

[3]  B. Gersh,et al.  Choice of arterial access site and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes managed with an early invasive strategy: the ACUITY trial. , 2009, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  Salim Yusuf,et al.  Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2009, American heart journal.

[5]  B. Gersh,et al.  Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  J. Riddell,et al.  Prognostic impact of major bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes.A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2007, EuroIntervention.

[7]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Adverse Impact of Bleeding on Prognosis in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2006, Circulation.

[8]  M. Hamon Vascular access site complications after PCI: current status and future directions , 2006, Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine.

[9]  Salim Yusuf,et al.  Comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  E. Fretz,et al.  Vascular communications of the hand in patients being considered for transradial coronary angiography: is the Allen's test accurate? , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  The implications of blood transfusions for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the CRUSADE National Quality Improvement Initiative. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  B. Strauss,et al.  Predictors and 1-year outcome of major bleeding in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: insights from the Canadian Acute Coronary Syndrome Registries. , 2005, American heart journal.

[13]  M. Rothman Drug Insight: bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention-risks, measures and impact of anticoagulant treatment options , 2005, Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine.

[14]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Relationship of blood transfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2004, JAMA.

[15]  E. Topol,et al.  Long-term efficacy of bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade vs heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary revascularization: REPLACE-2 randomized trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[16]  G. Biondi-Zoccai,et al.  Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  N. Weissman,et al.  Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of bleeding and blood transfusion following percutaneous coronary interventions. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  Werner Klein,et al.  Predictors of major bleeding in acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) , 2003 .

[19]  G. Laarman,et al.  Outpatient coronary stent implantation. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.