Interactive three-dimensional ultrasound using a programmable multimedia processor

We developed an interactive three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) workstation that is inexpensive and suitable for use in research and clinical environments. Our personal computer–based system produces 3D volumes by acquiring a series of 2D images from a commercial ultrasound scanner, spatially registering the images using an electromagnetic position sensor, and reconstructing the data into a regular 3D Cartesian volume. The 3D US system uses an imaging board based on the Texas Instruments TMS320C80 Multimedia Video Processor (MVP), a fully programmable mediaprocessor that includes multiple processing units on a single chip. We developed efficient volume reconstruction and visualization algorithms for the MVP that allow our 3D US system to provide the same immediate feedback as current 2D US technologies with the added advantage of presenting information in three dimensions. For example, for acquired sequences of 512 3 512 US images, volumes can be reconstructed using six degree-of-freedom position measurements at 11.4 frames/s. A modified reconstruction algorithm that performs incremental reconstruction was developed to enable real-time volume reconstruction and visualization during acquisition and operates at 12.5 frames/s. US volumes can be rendered via shear-warp factorization and maximum intensity projection (MIP) at 10 frames/s for 128 3 128 3 128 volumes and 1.45 frames/s for 255 3 255 3 255 volumes. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Imaging Syst Technol, 9, 442–454, 1998

[1]  Hong Chen,et al.  Observing a volume rendered fetus within a pregnant patient , 1994, Proceedings Visualization '94.

[2]  A Fenster,et al.  Three-dimensional colour Doppler imaging. , 1993, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  S. Tong,et al.  A three-dimensional ultrasound prostate imaging system. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  J E Kuhlman,et al.  Three-dimensional helical CT of intrahepatic venous structures: comparison of three rendering techniques. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  M. Levoy,et al.  Fast volume rendering using a shear-warp factorization of the viewing transformation , 1994, SIGGRAPH.

[6]  S.W. Smith,et al.  High-speed ultrasound volumetric imaging system. II. Parallel processing and image display , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[7]  O Basset,et al.  Spatial compounding in ultrasonic imaging using an articulated scan arm. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  T. Todd Elvins,et al.  Visualization of 3D ultrasound data , 1993, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[9]  T. Nelson,et al.  Fetal face visualization using three‐dimensional ultrasonography. , 1995, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[10]  Ryutarou Ohbuchi,et al.  Incremental volume reconstruction and rendering for 3-D ultrasound imaging , 1992, Other Conferences.

[11]  Y Kim,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrasonic angiography using power-mode Doppler. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  T. Nelson,et al.  Visualization of the fetal thoracic skeleton with three-dimensional sonography: a preliminary report. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Dolores H. Pretorius,et al.  Interactive acquisition, analysis, and visualization of sonographic volume data , 1997, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[14]  Michael D. McCool,et al.  Interactive maximum projection volume rendering , 1995, Proceedings Visualization '95.

[15]  Robert Rohling,et al.  Spatial Compounding of 3-D Ultrasound Images , 1997, IPMI.

[16]  E Merz,et al.  Volume scanning in the evaluation of fetal malformations: a new dimension in prenatal diagnosis , 1995, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[17]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Techniques for speeding up high-quality perspective maximum intensity projection , 1994, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[18]  B S Kuszyk,et al.  CT angiography with volume rendering: advantages and applications in splanchnic vascular imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[19]  J R Crass,et al.  Radiological application of three-dimensional imaging systems. , 1992, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[20]  Ryutarou Ohbuchi,et al.  Incremental Volume Rendering Algorithm for Interactive 3D Ultrasound Imaging , 1991, IPMI.

[21]  Warren S. Edwards,et al.  Calibration and validation of freehand 3D ultrasound systems based on DC magnetic tracking , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[22]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  Efficient Implementation of Image Warping on a Multimedia Processor , 1998, Real Time Imaging.

[23]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Volume Visualization on Shared Memory Architectures , 1997, Parallel Comput..

[24]  Chris Basoglu,et al.  Programmable ultrasound imaging using multimedia technologies: a next-generation ultrasound machine , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[25]  T. Nelson,et al.  Distance and volume measurement using three‐dimensional ultrasonography. , 1995, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[26]  Karl M. Guttag,et al.  A single-chip multiprocessor for multimedia: the MVP , 1992, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[27]  A. Fenster,et al.  3-D ultrasound imaging: a review , 1996 .