A Bibliometric Study to Assess Bioprinting Evolution

Bioprinting as a tissue engineering tool is one of the most promising technologies for overcoming organ shortage. However, the spread of populist articles among on this technology could potentially lead public opinion to idealize its readiness. This bibliometric study aimed to trace the evolution of bioprinting literature over the past decade (i.e., 2000 to 2015) using the SCI-expanded database of Web of Science® (WoS, Thomson Reuters). The articles were analyzed by combining various bibliometric tools, such as science mapping and topic analysis, and a Technology Readiness Scale was adapted to assess the evolution of this emerging field. The number of analyzed publications was low (231), but the literature grew exceptionally fast. The “Engineering, Biomedical” was still the most represented WoS category. Some of the recent fronts were “hydrogels” and “stem cells”, while “in vitro” remained one of the most used keywords. The number of countries and journals involved in bioprinting literature grew substantially in one decade, also supporting the idea of an increasing community. Neither the United States’ leadership in bioprinting productivity nor the role of universities in publications were challenged. “Biofabrication” and “Biomaterials” journals were still the leaders of the bioprinting field. Bioprinting is a young but promising technology.

[1]  Slaviana Pavlovich,et al.  Should Society Encourage The Development Of 3D Printing, Particularly 3D Bioprinting Of Tissues And Organs? , 2016 .

[2]  R. Bracci,et al.  Bioresorbable Airway Splint Created with a Three-Dimensional Printer , 2013 .

[3]  Anthony Atala,et al.  3D bioprinting of tissues and organs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  Feng Xu,et al.  4D Bioprinting for Biomedical Applications. , 2016, Trends in biotechnology.

[5]  D. Weiss,et al.  Whole-Organ Tissue Engineering: No Longer Just a Dream , 2016, Current Pathobiology Reports.

[6]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Forecasting Innovation Pathways (FIP) for new and emerging science and technologies , 2013 .

[7]  Vladimir Mironov,et al.  Bioprinting is coming of age: report from the International Conference on Bioprinting and Biofabrication in Bordeaux (3B'09) , 2010, Biofabrication.

[8]  V Mironov,et al.  Biofabrication: a 21st century manufacturing paradigm , 2009, Biofabrication.

[9]  Douglas K. R. Robinson,et al.  Multi-path mapping for alignment strategies in emerging science and technologies , 2008 .

[10]  Dong-Woo Cho,et al.  Biofabrication: reappraising the definition of an evolving field , 2016, Biofabrication.

[11]  Ibrahim T. Ozbolat,et al.  Bioprinting scale-up tissue and organ constructs for transplantation. , 2015, Trends in biotechnology.

[12]  Chuck Zhang,et al.  Bioprinting: an assessment based on manufacturing readiness levels. , 2017, Critical reviews in biotechnology.

[13]  S Vijayavenkataraman,et al.  3D bioprinting of skin: a state-of-the-art review on modelling, materials, and processes , 2016, Biofabrication.

[14]  Gill Haddow,et al.  3D bioprint me: a socioethical view of bioprinting human organs and tissues , 2017, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[15]  A. Khademhosseini,et al.  Concise Review: Organ Engineering: Design, Technology, and Integration , 2016, Stem cells.

[16]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Scientific evolutionary pathways: Identifying and visualizing relationships for scientific topics , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  Ed C. M. Noyons,et al.  A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[18]  F. Marga,et al.  Toward engineering functional organ modules by additive manufacturing , 2012, Biofabrication.

[19]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  Pu Chen,et al.  Towards artificial tissue models: past, present, and future of 3D bioprinting , 2016, Biofabrication.

[21]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Technology opportunities analysis , 1995 .

[22]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories , 2012, Scientometrics.

[23]  Robert M. Nerem,et al.  Regenerative medicine: the emergence of an industry , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[24]  Dhruv R. Seshadri,et al.  A Review of Three-Dimensional Printing in Tissue Engineering. , 2016, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[25]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  A hybrid visualisation model for technology roadmapping: bibliometrics, qualitative methodology and empirical study , 2013, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[26]  James J. Yoo,et al.  A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  John C. Mankins,et al.  Technology Readiness Levels-A White Paper , 1995 .

[28]  Ibrahim T. Ozbolat,et al.  Application areas of 3D bioprinting. , 2016, Drug discovery today.

[29]  Ibrahim T. Ozbolat,et al.  The bioink: A comprehensive review on bioprintable materials. , 2017, Biotechnology advances.

[30]  Vladimir Mironov,et al.  Organ printing: from bioprinter to organ biofabrication line. , 2011, Current opinion in biotechnology.