Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies

Abstract To what extent does perceptual language reflect universals of experience and cognition, and to what extent is it shaped by particular cultural preoccupations? This paper investigates the universality~relativity of perceptual language by examining the use of basic perception terms in spontaneous conversation across 13 diverse languages and cultures. We analyze the frequency of perception words to test two universalist hypotheses: that sight is always a dominant sense, and that the relative ranking of the senses will be the same across different cultures. We find that references to sight outstrip references to the other senses, suggesting a pan-human preoccupation with visual phenomena. However, the relative frequency of the other senses was found to vary cross-linguistically. Cultural relativity was conspicuous as exemplified by the high ranking of smell in Semai, an Aslian language. Together these results suggest a place for both universal constraints and cultural shaping of the language of perception.

[1]  Urban T. Holmes,et al.  A dictionary of selected synonyms in the principal Indo-European languages , 1950 .

[2]  Ernst Pulgram,et al.  A dictionary of selected synonyms in the principal Indo-European languages , 1950 .

[3]  F. Colavita.  Human sensory dominance , 1974 .

[4]  Cecil H. Brown,et al.  MARKING-REVERSALS AND CULTURAL IMPORTANCE , 1983 .

[5]  Cecil H. Brown,et al.  Polysemy, Lexical Change and Cultural Importance , 1983 .

[6]  Å. Viberg.  The verbs of perception: a typological study , 1983 .

[7]  D. Edwards,et al.  The language of shared attention and visual experience: A functional study of early nomination , 1985 .

[8]  Joan L. Bybee.  Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form , 1985 .

[9]  Lexical Frequency and Its Implications: The Case of Contemporary Edited Russian , 1986 .

[10]  Matthew S. Dryer,et al.  Large Linguistic Areas and Language Sampling , 1989 .

[11]  Eve Sweetser,et al.  From Etymology to Pragmatics: Preface , 1990 .

[12]  W. Beek.  The dirty smith: smell as a social frontier among the Kapsiki/Higi of north Cameroon and north-eastern Nigeria , 1992, Africa.

[13]  D. Howes,et al.  The varieties of sensory experience : a sourcebook in the anthropology of the senses , 1992 .

[14]  Åke Viberg,et al.  Progression & regression in language: Crosslinguistic perspectives on lexical organization and lexical progression , 1994 .

[15]  Andrew Pawley,et al.  15 Kalam Exponents of Lexical and Semantic Primitives , 1994 .

[16]  Cliff Goddard,et al.  2 Introducing Lexical Primitives , 1994 .

[17]  C. Moore,et al.  Joint attention : its origins and role in development , 1995 .

[18]  Christina Alm-Arvius,et al.  The English Verb See : A Study in Multiple Meaning , 1995 .

[19]  В.А. Плунгян,et al.  Рец. на кн.: Goddard, Cliff; Wierzbicka, Anna (eds). Semantic and lexical universals: Theory and empirical findings. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1994 , 1996 .

[20]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  Interaction and grammar: Frontmatter , 1996 .

[21]  Jesús Romero Trillo.  Your attention, please: Pragmatic mechanisms to obtain the addressee's attention in English and Spanish conversations☆ , 1997 .

[22]  Susan Alexis Collins,et al.  In conversation , 1998, SIGGRAPH '98.

[23]  Nicholas Evans,et al.  In the Mind's Ear: The Semantic Extensions of Perception Verbs in Australian Languages. , 2000 .

[24]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Illusions: What you see is what you hear , 2000, Nature.

[25]  H. Barlow.  Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology by Stephen E. Palmer , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Ö. Dahl.  Inflationary effects in language and elsewhere , 2001 .

[27]  From matrix clause to pragmatic marker: The history of look-forms , 2001 .

[28]  Paul J. Hopper,et al.  Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2001 .

[29]  Matthew J. Hertenstein.  Touch: Its Communicative Functions in Infancy , 2002, Human Development.

[30]  Ipakana yakaiya : mapping landscapes, mapping lives, contemporary land politics among the Duna , 2002 .

[31]  N. Evans.  Context, culture and structuration in the languages of Australia , 2003 .

[32]  Revaz Tchantouria,et al.  Basic verb frequency in Megrelian , 2005 .

[33]  C. Woolgar.  A History of the Senses: From Antiquity to Cyberspace , 2006 .

[34]  Robert A Barton,et al.  Olfactory evolution and behavioral ecology in primates , 2006, American journal of primatology.

[35]  Kathleen Ahrens,et al.  Using a Small Corpus to Test Linguistic Hypotheses: Evaluating ‘People’ in the State of the Union Addresses , 2006, ROCLING/IJCLCLP.

[36]  S. Levinson,et al.  Roots of Human Sociality , 2006 .

[37]  Ljuba N. Veselinova.  Suppletion in Verb Paradigms: Bits and pieces of the puzzle , 2006 .

[38]  S. Levinson.  On the Human "Interaction Engine" , 2020, Roots of Human Sociality.

[39]  N. J. Enfield,et al.  A grammar of Lao , 2007 .

[40]  Ljuba N. Veselinova. Suppletion in Verb Paradigms: Bits and pieces of the puzzle . , 2007 .

[41]  Dirk Semmann,et al.  Gossip as an alternative for direct observation in games of indirect reciprocity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Barbara A. Fox,et al.  Principles shaping grammatical practices: an exploration , 2007 .

[43]  J. Sidnell.  `Look'-prefaced turns in first and second position: launching, interceding and redirecting action , 2007 .

[44]  Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm,et al.  Approaching lexical typology , 2008 .

[45]  S. Levinson,et al.  Differential Ineffability and the Senses , 2014 .

[46]  Martine Vanhove,et al.  Semantic associations between sensory modalities, prehension and mental perceptions: A cross-linguistic perspective , 2008 .

[47]  L. San Roque,et al.  An introduction to Duna grammar , 2008 .

[48]  T. Dirksmeyer.  Spatial deixis in Chintang: Aspects of a grammar of space , 2008 .

[49]  Marc Brys,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009 .

[50]  C. Spence.  Explaining the Colavita visual dominance effect. , 2009, Progress in brain research.

[51]  S. Tufvesson.  Analogy-making in the Semai Sensory World , 2011 .

[52]  P. Kay,et al.  Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  P. Lewis.  Ethnologue : languages of the world , 2009 .

[54]  J. Hammond.  The grammar of nouns and verbs in Whitesands, an oceanic language of Southern Vanuatu , 2009 .

[55]  S. Levinson,et al.  The Senses in Language and Culture , 2011 .

[56]  Simeon Floyd,et al.  Discourse forms and social categorization in Cha’palaa , 2010 .

[57]  Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald,et al.  Imperatives and Commands , 2010 .

[58]  Constance Classen,et al.  Foundations for an anthropology of the senses , 2010 .

[59]  S. Levinson,et al.  Question-response sequences in conversation across ten languages: An introduction , 2010 .

[60]  P. Brown.  Reprints Available Directly from the Publishers Photocopying Permitted by License Only Color Me Bitter: Crossmodal Compounding in Tzeltal Perception Words Tzeltal Perception Words , 2022 .

[61]  Balthasar Bickel,et al.  Nouns and verbs in Chintang: children's usage and surrounding adult speech* , 2011, Journal of Child Language.

[62]  A. Majid,et al.  Reprints Available Directly from the Publishers Photocopying Permitted by License Only Olfaction in Aslian Ideology and Language , 2022 .

[63]  L. S. Roque,et al.  Demonstratives and non-embedded nominalisations in three Papuan languages of the Timor-Alor-Pantar family , 2011 .

[64]  Mark Dingemanse,et al.  The Meaning and use of ideophones in Siwu , 2011 .

[65]  N. J. Enfield,et al.  Taste in Two Tongues: A Southeast Asian Study of Semantic Convergence , 2011 .

[66]  Discourse-structuring functions of Abui demonstratives , 2011 .

[67]  Mark Dingemanse,et al.  The semantic structure of sensory vocabulary in an African language , 2012, CogSci.

[68]  "Watching for witness": evidential strategies and epistemic authority in Garrwa conversation , 2012 .

[69]  Mark Dingemanse,et al.  Advances in the Cross-Linguistic Study of Ideophones , 2012, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[70]  P. Blitvich.  Levinson, Stephen C. , 2012 .

[71]  Reported speech as an evidentiality strategy in American Sign Language , 2012 .

[72]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  Conversational Repair and Human Understanding: Ten operations in self-initiated, same-turn repair , 2013 .

[73]  6 Perception and Cognition in Manambu, a Papuan Language from New Guinea , 2013 .

[74]  A. Aikhenvald,et al.  1 Linguistic Expression of Perception and Cognition: A Typological Glimpse , 2013 .

[75]  Tense, aspect, and mood in Avatime , 2013 .

[76]  A. Majid,et al.  Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language , 2014, Cognition.

[77]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Quantitative Standards for Absolute Linguistic Universals , 2014, Cogn. Sci..

[78]  A. Majid,et al.  Revisiting the limits of language: The odor lexicon of Maniq , 2014, Cognition.

[79]  U. Eggers.  Sound And Sentiment Birds Weeping Poetics And Song In Kaluli Expression , 2016 .

[80]  安平鎬,et al.  Evidentiality , 2018, A Grammar of Nganasan.