Social Network Reduction Based on Stability

The analysis of social networks is concentrated especially on uncovering hidden relations and properties of network members (vertices). Most of the current approaches are focused mainly on different network types and different network coefficients. On one hand, the analysis can be relatively simple, on the other hand some complex approaches to network dynamics can be used. This paper introduces a novel aspect of network analysis based on the so-called Forgetting Curve. For network vertices and edges, we define two coefficients, which describe their role in the network depending on their long-term behavior. Using one of these parameters we reduce the network to smaller components. We provide some experimental results using DBLP dataset. Our research illustrates the usefulness of the proposed approach.

[1]  Richard L. Hart,et al.  Co-authorship in the academic library literature: A survey of attitudes and behaviors , 2000 .

[2]  Roberto Therón,et al.  Overlapping Clustered Graphs: Co-authorship Networks Visualization , 2008, Smart Graphics.

[3]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Mining Diversity on Networks , 2010, DASFAA.

[4]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations , 2001, cond-mat/0104162.

[5]  M. Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Linton C. Freeman,et al.  Carnegie Mellon: Journal of Social Structure: Visualizing Social Networks Visualizing Social Networks , 2022 .

[7]  Dongwon Lee,et al.  On six degrees of separation in DBLP-DB and more , 2005, SGMD.

[8]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[9]  Ryutaro Ichise,et al.  Finding Experts by Link Prediction in Co-authorship Networks , 2007, FEWS.

[10]  Mao Lin Huang,et al.  Analysis and Visualization of Co-authorship Networks for Understanding Academic Collaboration and Knowledge Domain of Individual Researchers , 2006, International Conference on Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualisation (CGIV'06).

[11]  M. Newman 1 Who is the best connected scientist ? A study of scientific coauthorship networks , 2004 .

[12]  Yuhui Qiu,et al.  Exploring Emergent Semantic Communities from DBLP Bibliography Database , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[13]  Bin Wu,et al.  Visual Analysis of a Co-authorship Network and Its Underlying Structure , 2008, 2008 Fifth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery.

[14]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[15]  Padhraic Smyth,et al.  Prediction and ranking algorithms for event-based network data , 2005, SKDD.

[16]  J. Wixted,et al.  Genuine power curves in forgetting: A quantitative analysis of individual subject forgetting functions , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[17]  L. da F. Costa,et al.  Characterization of complex networks: A survey of measurements , 2005, cond-mat/0505185.

[18]  Jian Pei,et al.  Understanding Importance of Collaborations in Co-authorship Networks: A Supportiveness Analysis Approach , 2009, SDM.