Journals and repositories: an evolving relationship?

It is now widely accepted that there are two routes to open access (OA): OA repositories and OA journals. It is often assumed these are distinct alternative parallel tracks. However, it has recently become clear that there is potential for repositories and journals to interact with each other on an ongoing basis and between them to form a coherent OA scholarly communication system. This paper puts forward three possible models of interaction between repositories and journals; services such as arXiv and PubMed Central, and the work carried out by the RIOJA project, are working exemplars and pilot implementations of these models. The key issues associated with the widespread adoption of these models include repository infrastructure development; changing ideas of the ‘journal’, ‘article’, and ‘publication’; version management; quality assurance; business and funding models; developing value‐added features; content preservation; policy frameworks; and changing roles and cultures within the research community.

[1]  David Goodman,et al.  Open access and accuracy: author‐archived manuscripts vs. published articles , 2007, Learn. Publ..

[2]  David C. Prosser FULFILLING THE PROMISE OF SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION - A COMPARISON BETWEEN OLD AND NEW ACCESS MODELS , 2005 .

[3]  P. Geurts,et al.  Forces and functions in scientific communication: an analysis of their interplay , 1997 .

[4]  Clifford Lynch 19 – Open computation: beyond human reader-centric views of scholarly literatures , 2006 .

[5]  John W. T. Smith,et al.  The deconstructed journal – a new model for academic publishing , 2004 .

[6]  Stephen S. Murray,et al.  E‐prints and journal articles in astronomy: a productive co‐existence , 2006, Learn. Publ..

[7]  Alma Swan,et al.  The business of digital repositories , 2008 .

[8]  Ross MacDonald,et al.  Scholarly Publishing in an Electronic Era: International Yearbook of Library and Information Management 2004‐2005 , 2005 .

[9]  Cliff Morgan Journal article version nomenclature: the NISO/ALPSP recommendations , 2008, Learn. Publ..

[11]  R. Terry,et al.  Funding the Way to Open Access , 2005, PLoS biology.

[12]  Leo Waaijers,et al.  A DRIVER's Guide to European Repositories : Five studies of important Digital Repository related issues and good Practices , 2007 .

[13]  Stephen Pinfield,et al.  Self-archiving publications , 2004 .

[14]  Les Carr,et al.  Mandated online RAE CVs Linked to University Eprint Archives , 2003 .

[15]  Robert Campbell,et al.  Author's version vs. publisher's version: an analysis of the copy‐editing function , 2007, Learn. Publ..

[16]  Jean-Claude Guédon,et al.  Open Access Archives: from scientific plutocracy to the republic of science , 2003 .

[17]  Stephen Pinfield A Wel(l)come development: research funders and open access , 2006, Learn. Publ..

[18]  Arthur P. Smith,et al.  The journal as an overlay on preprint databases , 2000, Learn. Publ..

[19]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Validating research performance metrics against peer rankings , 2008 .

[20]  Sally Morris,et al.  Defining and Certifying Electronic Publication in Science , 2000 .