Prospects for transcranial temporal interference stimulation in humans: A computational study

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a noninvasive method used to modulate activity of superficial brain regions. Deeper and more steerable stimulation could potentially be achieved using transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS): two high-frequency alternating fields interact to produce a wave with an envelope frequency in the range thought to modulate neural activity. Promising initial results have been reported for experiments with mice. In this study we aim to better understand the electric fields produced with tTIS and examine its prospects in humans through simulations with murine and human head models. A murine head finite element model was used to simulate previously published experiments of tTIS in mice. With a total current of 0.776 mA, tTIS electric field strengths up to 383 V/m were reached in the modeled mouse brain, affirming experimental results indicating that suprathreshold stimulation is possible in mice. Using a detailed anisotropic human head model, tTIS was simulated with systematically varied electrode configurations and input currents to investigate how these parameters influence the electric fields. An exhaustive search with 88 electrode locations covering the entire head (146M current patterns) was employed to optimize tTIS for target field strength and focality. In all analyses, we investigated maximal effects and effects along the predominant orientation of local neurons. Our results showed that it was possible to steer the peak tTIS field by manipulating the relative strength of the two input fields. Deep brain areas received field strengths similar to conventional tACS, but with less stimulation in superficial areas. Maximum field strengths in the human model were much lower than in the murine model, too low to expect direct stimulation effects. While field strengths from tACS were slightly higher, our results suggest that tTIS is capable of producing more focal fields and allows for better steerability. Finally, we present optimal four-electrode current patterns to maximize tTIS in regions of the pallidum (0.37 V/m), hippocampus (0.24 V/m) and motor cortex (0.57 V/m).

[1]  S. Rossi,et al.  Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) , 2017, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  Mark S. George,et al.  Evidence of transcranial direct current stimulation-generated electric fields at subthalamic level in human brain in vivo , 2018, Brain Stimulation.

[3]  G C Goats,et al.  Interferential current therapy. , 1990, British journal of sports medicine.

[4]  A. Destée,et al.  Bilateral deep-brain stimulation of the globus pallidus in primary generalized dystonia. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Axel Thielscher,et al.  Field modeling for transcranial magnetic stimulation: A useful tool to understand the physiological effects of TMS? , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[6]  Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) mechanisms and its effects on cortical excitability and connectivity , 2018, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease.

[7]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  One-dimensional representation of a neuron in a uniform electric field , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  C C Brown,et al.  Electroanesthesia and electrosleep. , 1975, The American psychologist.

[9]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  How the brain tissue shapes the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[10]  D. B. Heppner,et al.  Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. , 1967, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[11]  J. D. Munck,et al.  The electric resistivity of human tissues (100 Hz-10 MHz): a meta-analysis of review studies. , 1999, Physiological measurement.

[12]  Deniz Erdogmus,et al.  Optimization of focality and direction in dense electrode array transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[13]  L. Parra,et al.  Low-Intensity Electrical Stimulation Affects Network Dynamics by Modulating Population Rate and Spike Timing , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  N. Spruston,et al.  Diversity and dynamics of dendritic signaling. , 2000, Science.

[15]  Doyun Lee,et al.  Hippocampal Place Fields Emerge upon Single-Cell Manipulation of Excitability During Behavior , 2012, Science.

[16]  Mark T. Harnett,et al.  Nonlinear dendritic integration of sensory and motor input during an active sensing task , 2012, Nature.

[17]  J. Jefferys,et al.  Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  S. Hemm,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the globus pallidus internus in patients with primary generalized dystonia: long-term results. , 2004, Journal of neurosurgery.

[19]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Direct effects of transcranial electric stimulation on brain circuits in rats and humans , 2018, Nature Communications.

[21]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Enhances Individual Alpha Activity in Human EEG , 2010, PloS one.

[22]  Y. Yarom,et al.  Resonance, oscillation and the intrinsic frequency preferences of neurons , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[23]  W. Spain,et al.  Linear to supralinear summation of AMPA-mediated EPSPs in neocortical pyramidal neurons. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[25]  Hang Si,et al.  TetGen, a Delaunay-Based Quality Tetrahedral Mesh Generator , 2015, ACM Trans. Math. Softw..

[26]  Giulio Ruffini,et al.  Multifocal tDCS targeting the resting state motor network increases cortical excitability beyond traditional tDCS targeting unilateral motor cortex , 2017, NeuroImage.

[27]  Suhasa B. Kodandaramaiah,et al.  Noninvasive Deep Brain Stimulation via Temporally Interfering Electric Fields , 2017, Cell.

[28]  David A. Boas,et al.  Tetrahedral mesh generation from volumetric binary and grayscale images , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[29]  Kaori Ikeda,et al.  Sublinear integration underlies binocular processing in primary visual cortex , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Jackie Schiller,et al.  Nonlinear dendritic processing determines angular tuning of barrel cortex neurons in vivo , 2012, Nature.

[31]  L. Parra,et al.  Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[32]  Mary Lou Jackson,et al.  Temporal Profile of Functional Visual Rehabilitative Outcomes Modulated by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2012, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[33]  L. Parra,et al.  Can transcranial electric stimulation with multiple electrodes reach deep targets? , 2018, Brain Stimulation.

[34]  W. Rushton The effect upon the threshold for nervous excitation of the length of nerve exposed, and the angle between current and nerve , 1927, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Simulating Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation With a Detailed Anisotropic Human Head Model , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[36]  L. Parra,et al.  Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[37]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  Pallidal versus subthalamic deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Animal models of transcranial direct current stimulation: Methods and mechanisms , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[39]  Ettore Lettich,et al.  Ten Percent Electrode System for Topographic Studies of Spontaneous and Evoked EEG Activities , 1985 .

[40]  M. Velasco,et al.  Electrical Stimulation of the Hippocampal Epileptic Foci for Seizure Control: A Double‐Blind, Long‐Term Follow‐Up Study , 2007, Epilepsia.

[41]  L. Parra,et al.  Measurements and models of electric fields in the in vivo human brain during transcranial electric stimulation , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[42]  Nir Grossman,et al.  Modulation without surgical intervention , 2018, Science.

[43]  V Sturm,et al.  Safety and efficacy of pallidal or subthalamic nucleus stimulation in advanced PD , 2001, Neurology.

[44]  Pulkit Grover,et al.  STIMULUS: Noninvasive Dynamic Patterns of Neurostimulation Using Spatio-Temporal Interference , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[45]  Amir V. Tavakoli,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) Mechanisms and Protocols , 2017, bioRxiv.

[46]  Markus Zahn,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: A computer-based human model study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[47]  Mikael Persson,et al.  Computation of electric and magnetic stimulation in human head using the 3-D impedance method , 2003, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng..

[48]  Karin Wårdell,et al.  Relationship between Neural Activation and Electric Field Distribution during Deep Brain Stimulation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[49]  S. Wiebe,et al.  Hippocampal electrical stimulation in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy , 2006, Neurology.

[50]  Shapour Jaberzadeh,et al.  Does transcranial electrical stimulation enhance corticospinal excitability of the motor cortex in healthy individuals? A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2017, The European journal of neuroscience.

[51]  Marta Parazzini,et al.  Electric field and current density distribution in an anatomical head model during transcranial direct current stimulation for tinnitus treatment , 2012, Bioelectromagnetics.

[52]  Ziji Wu,et al.  Multiple material marching cubes algorithm , 2003 .

[53]  W. Sutherling,et al.  Conductivities of Three-Layer Live Human Skull , 2004, Brain Topography.

[54]  Spencer L. Smith,et al.  Dendritic spikes enhance stimulus selectivity in cortical neurons in vivo , 2013, Nature.

[55]  A. Brunoni,et al.  Working memory improvement with non-invasive brain stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014, Brain and Cognition.

[56]  Giulio Ruffini,et al.  Optimization of multifocal transcranial current stimulation for weighted cortical pattern targeting from realistic modeling of electric fields , 2014, NeuroImage.

[57]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Comparing Cortical Plasticity Induced by Conventional and High-Definition 4 × 1 Ring tDCS: A Neurophysiological Study , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[58]  S. Lefebvre,et al.  Dual-tDCS Enhances Online Motor Skill Learning and Long-Term Retention in Chronic Stroke Patients , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[59]  M. Bikson,et al.  Role of cortical cell type and morphology in subthreshold and suprathreshold uniform electric field stimulation in vitro , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[60]  Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen,et al.  How to target inter-regional phase synchronization with dual-site Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation , 2017, NeuroImage.

[61]  Bartlett W. Mel,et al.  Computational subunits in thin dendrites of pyramidal cells , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.