Bias Due to Visual Illusion in the Graphical Presentation of Accounting Information

Graphical displays of information are among the most common decision aids available. Recent research has focused on how graphs that have been prepared without following key preparation guidelines impact decision making. This paper adds to the literature by demonstrating that visual illusion may bias decision makers who view data from the graph, even if the graphs are prepared according to key‐preparation guidelines. The investigation of a visual illusion (i.e., an unintended consequence even in a correctly depicted graph) contrasts with prior studies in accounting that have typically examined manipulated graphs (i.e., intentionally distorted, incorrectly depicted graphs). A laboratory study incorporated a 2×2 design to examine the effects of the so‐called “Poggendorff illusion” and the possible mitigating effect of adding horizontal gridlines. It shows that decision makers may systematically underestimate or overestimate the values displayed on line graphs. In addition, this research suggests that the bia...

[1]  Joachim Meyer,et al.  Chartjunk or goldgraph? Effects of persenataion objectives and content desirability on information presentation: effects of presentation objectives and content desirability on information presentation , 1999 .

[2]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1986 .

[3]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Graphics and managerial decision making: research-based guidelines , 1988, CACM.

[4]  Wan Choon Ang,et al.  The use and abuse of graphs in annual reports , 1996 .

[5]  Iris Vessey,et al.  The effect of information presentation on decision making: A cost-benefit analysis , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[6]  Paul John Steinbart,et al.  Impression Management with Graphs: Effects on Choices , 2002, J. Inf. Syst..

[7]  M. Jones,et al.  The Use and Abuse of Graphs in Annual Reports: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Study , 1992 .

[8]  Iris Vessey,et al.  Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature* , 1991 .

[9]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[11]  J. Courtis,et al.  Corporate Annual Report Graphical Communication in Hong Kong: Effective or Misleading? , 1997 .

[12]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Graphical presentation of accounting data for financial forecasting: An experimental investigation , 1989 .

[13]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Guidelines for Presenting Quantitative Data in HFES Publications , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[14]  J. Gibson The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[15]  E C Poulton,et al.  Geometric illusions in reading graphs , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Spatial context affects the Poggendorff illusion , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  G Westheimer,et al.  Real and Virtual Borders in the Poggendorff Illusion , 1997, Perception.

[18]  Edward Tufte,et al.  Visual Explanations , 1997 .

[19]  S. Kosslyn Understanding charts and graphs , 1989 .

[20]  Marcus O'Connor,et al.  Scale, Variability, and the Calibration of Judgmental Prediction Intervals , 1993 .

[21]  R. Gregory,et al.  Distortion of Visual Space as Inappropriate Constancy Scaling , 1963, Nature.

[22]  Iris Vessey,et al.  Multiattribute Data Presentation and Human Judgment: A Cognitive Fit Perspective* , 1994 .

[23]  Cynthia Frownfelter-Lohrke,et al.  The effects of differing information presentations of general purpose financial statements on users' decisions , 1998 .

[24]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .