Coherence and Asymmetry Cannot be Broadcast.

In the presence of conservation laws, superpositions of eigenstates of the corresponding conserved quantities cannot be generated by quantum dynamics. Thus, any such coherence represents a potentially valuable resource of asymmetry, which can be used, for example, to enhance the precision of quantum metrology or to enable state transitions in quantum thermodynamics. Here we ask if such superpositions, already present in a reference system, can be broadcast to other systems, thereby distributing asymmetry indefinitely at the expense of creating correlations. We prove a no-go theorem showing that this is forbidden by quantum mechanics in every finite-dimensional system. In doing so, we also answer some open questions in the quantum information literature concerning the sharing of timing information of a clock and the possibility of catalysis in quantum thermodynamics. We also prove that even weaker forms of broadcasting, of which Åberg's "catalytic coherence" is a particular example, can only occur in the presence of infinite-dimensional reference systems. Our results set fundamental limits on the creation and manipulation of quantum coherence and shed light on the possibilities and limitations of quantum reference frames to act catalytically without being degraded.

[1]  R. Bhatia Matrix Analysis , 1996 .

[2]  D. Janzing,et al.  Thermodynamic Cost of Reliability and Low Temperatures: Tightening Landauer's Principle and the Second Law , 2000, quant-ph/0002048.

[3]  J. Parrondo,et al.  Autonomous thermal machine for amplification and control of energetic coherence. , 2017, Physical review. E.

[4]  John Stillwell,et al.  Symmetry , 2000, Am. Math. Mon..

[5]  M. Plenio,et al.  Colloquium: quantum coherence as a resource , 2016, 1609.02439.

[6]  S. Barnett,et al.  Is coherence catalytic? , 2018, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical.

[7]  Thora Tenbrink,et al.  Reference Frames , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[8]  R. Renner,et al.  Fundamental work cost of quantum processes , 2017, 1709.00506.

[9]  I. Chakrabarty,et al.  Broadcasting Quantum Coherence via Cloning , 2016, 1605.02458.

[10]  Masato Koashi,et al.  Operations that do not disturb partially known quantum states , 2002 .

[11]  V. Scarani,et al.  Quantum cloning , 2005, quant-ph/0511088.

[12]  T. Rudolph,et al.  Degradation of a quantum reference frame , 2006, quant-ph/0602069.

[13]  R. Uzdin The second law and beyond in microscopic quantum setups , 2018, 1805.02065.

[14]  Andrzej Grudka,et al.  Creating a Superposition of Unknown Quantum States. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[15]  R. Spekkens,et al.  How to quantify coherence: Distinguishing speakable and unspeakable notions , 2016, 1602.08049.

[16]  R. Cleve,et al.  Perfect Embezzlement of Entanglement , 2016, 1606.05061.

[17]  R. Werner OPTIMAL CLONING OF PURE STATES , 1998, quant-ph/9804001.

[18]  R. Werner,et al.  Optimal cloning of pure states, testing single clones , 1998, quant-ph/9807010.

[19]  Mehdi Ahmadi The resource theory of asymmetry and some of its applications , 2012 .

[20]  D. Jennings,et al.  Irreversibility and Quantum Information Flow under Global & Local Gauge Symmetries , 2018 .

[21]  David Jennings,et al.  The extraction of work from quantum coherence , 2015, 1506.07875.

[22]  M. Horodecki,et al.  Fundamental limitations for quantum and nanoscale thermodynamics , 2011, Nature Communications.

[23]  Junde Wu,et al.  Catalytic coherence transformations , 2015, 1511.08071.

[24]  Schumacher,et al.  Noncommuting mixed states cannot be broadcast. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[25]  J. Åberg Catalytic coherence. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[26]  George Rajna Quantum Speed Limits , 2016 .

[27]  R. Spekkens,et al.  Measuring the quality of a quantum reference frame: The relative entropy of frameness , 2009, 0901.0943.

[28]  A. J. Short,et al.  Clock-driven quantum thermal engines , 2014, 1412.1338.

[29]  T. Rudolph,et al.  Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information , 2006, quant-ph/0610030.

[30]  Frank Hansen The Wigner-Yanase Entropy is not Subadditive , 2007 .

[31]  T. Rudolph,et al.  Degradation of a quantum directional reference frame as a random walk , 2006, quant-ph/0607107.

[32]  M. Plenio,et al.  Entanglement-Assisted Local Manipulation of Pure Quantum States , 1999, quant-ph/9905071.

[33]  P. Hayden,et al.  Universal entanglement transformations without communication , 2003 .

[34]  D. Janzing Decomposition of time-covariant operations on quantum systems with continuous and∕or discrete energy spectrum , 2004, quant-ph/0407144.

[35]  Robert W. Spekkens,et al.  Quantum speed limits, coherence, and asymmetry , 2015, 1510.06474.

[36]  A. Winter,et al.  Communications in Mathematical Physics Structure of States Which Satisfy Strong Subadditivity of Quantum Entropy with Equality , 2022 .

[37]  Thomas Beth,et al.  Quasi-order of clocks and their synchronism and quantum bounds for copying timing information , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[38]  David Jennings,et al.  Description of quantum coherence in thermodynamic processes requires constraints beyond free energy , 2014, Nature Communications.

[39]  S. Luo,et al.  Weak superadditivity of skew information , 2008 .

[40]  R. Renner,et al.  Gibbs-preserving maps outperform thermal operations in the quantum regime , 2014, 1406.3618.

[41]  Michal Horodecki,et al.  The second laws of quantum thermodynamics , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  John Dauns,et al.  COHERENCE , 2002 .

[43]  R. Spekkens,et al.  Extending Noether’s theorem by quantifying the asymmetry of quantum states , 2014, Nature Communications.

[44]  M. Lostaglio,et al.  Markovian evolution of quantum coherence under symmetric dynamics , 2017, 1703.01826.

[45]  P. Horodecki,et al.  No-local-broadcasting theorem for multipartite quantum correlations. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[46]  R. Spekkens,et al.  No-Broadcasting Theorem for Quantum Asymmetry and Coherence and a Trade-off Relation for Approximate Broadcasting. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[47]  Markus P. Mueller Correlating Thermal Machines and the Second Law at the Nanoscale , 2017, Physical Review X.