Compounds of symmetric informationally complete measurements and their application in quantum key distribution
暂无分享,去创建一个
Armin Tavakoli | Joseph M. Renes | Nicolas Gisin | Ingemar Bengtsson | N. Gisin | J. Renes | I. Bengtsson | A. Tavakoli
[1] O. Hesse,et al. Über die Wendepuncte der Curven dritter Ordnung. (Fortsetzung zu voriger Abhandlung). , 1844 .
[2] J. Seidel,et al. BOUNDS FOR SYSTEMS OF LINES, AND JACOBI POLYNOMIALS , 1975 .
[3] S. G. Hoggar. Two Quaternionic 4-Polytopes , 1981 .
[4] H. Coxeter,et al. The Geometric vein : the Coxeter Festschrift , 1981 .
[5] William K. Wootters,et al. A ‘Pretty Good’ Measurement for Distinguishing Quantum States , 1994 .
[6] N. Gisin,et al. Optimal Eavesdropping in Quantum Cryptography. I , 1997, quant-ph/9701039.
[7] D. Bruß. Optimal Eavesdropping in Quantum Cryptography with Six States , 1998, quant-ph/9805019.
[8] S. Barnett. Minimum-error discrimination between multiply symmetric states , 2001 .
[9] Joseph M. Renes,et al. Symmetric informationally complete quantum measurements , 2003, quant-ph/0310075.
[10] D. M. Appleby. SIC-POVMs and the Extended Clifford Group , 2004 .
[11] D. M. Appleby. Symmetric informationally complete–positive operator valued measures and the extended Clifford group , 2005 .
[12] R. Renner,et al. An information-theoretic security proof for QKD protocols , 2005, quant-ph/0502064.
[13] B Kraus,et al. Lower and upper bounds on the secret-key rate for quantum key distribution protocols using one-way classical communication. , 2004, Physical review letters.
[14] R. Renner,et al. Information-theoretic security proof for quantum-key-distribution protocols , 2005, quant-ph/0502064.
[15] J. Renes. Equiangular spherical codes in quantum cryptography , 2004, Quantum Inf. Comput..
[16] A. Winter,et al. Distillation of secret key and entanglement from quantum states , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[17] A. Robert Calderbank,et al. The Finite Heisenberg-Weyl Groups in Radar and Communications , 2006, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..
[18] Markus Grassl,et al. Generalized decoding, effective channels, and simplified security proofs in quantum key distribution , 2006 .
[19] A. J. Scott. Tight informationally complete quantum measurements , 2006, quant-ph/0604049.
[20] Ruediger Schack,et al. Quantum-Bayesian Coherence , 2009, 1301.3274.
[21] Matthias Christandl,et al. Postselection technique for quantum channels with applications to quantum cryptography. , 2008, Physical review letters.
[22] R. Balan,et al. Painless Reconstruction from Magnitudes of Frame Coefficients , 2009 .
[23] T. V'ertesi,et al. Two-qubit Bell inequality for which positive operator-valued measurements are relevant , 2010, 1007.2578.
[24] Valerio Scarani,et al. Security proof for quantum key distribution using qudit systems , 2010, 1003.5464.
[25] Berthold-Georg Englert,et al. Structure of Two-qubit Symmetric Informationally Complete POVMs , 2010 .
[26] Denes Petz,et al. Efficient quantum tomography needs complementary and symmetric measurements , 2010, 1011.5210.
[27] A. J. Scott,et al. Symmetric informationally complete positive-operator-valued measures: A new computer study , 2010 .
[28] Huangjun Zhu. SIC POVMs and Clifford groups in prime dimensions , 2010, 1003.3591.
[29] Y. S. Teo,et al. Two-qubit symmetric informationally complete positive-operator-valued measures , 2010 .
[30] Huangjun Zhu,et al. Quantum state tomography with fully symmetric measurements and product measurements , 2011 .
[31] G. Zauner,et al. QUANTUM DESIGNS: FOUNDATIONS OF A NONCOMMUTATIVE DESIGN THEORY , 2011 .
[32] Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al. Experimental characterization of qutrits using symmetric informationally complete positive operator-valued measurements , 2011 .
[33] Markus Grassl,et al. The monomial representations of the Clifford group , 2011, Quantum Inf. Comput..
[34] Miguel Navascués,et al. Dimension witnesses and quantum state discrimination. , 2012, Physical review letters.
[35] A. Delgado,et al. Minimum tomography of two entangled qutrits using local measurements of one-qutrit symmetric informationally complete positive operator-valued measure , 2013 .
[36] David Marcus Appleby,et al. Galois automorphisms of a symmetric measurement , 2012, Quantum Inf. Comput..
[37] J. Bae,et al. Optimal approximate transpose map via quantum designs and its applications to entanglement detection , 2013, 1303.3096.
[38] Simon Salamon,et al. Surveying points in the complex projective plane , 2014 .
[39] Kate Blanchfield. Orbits of mutually unbiased bases , 2014 .
[40] Gilles Brassard,et al. Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing , 2014, Theor. Comput. Sci..
[41] R. Boyd,et al. Experimental Realization of Quantum Tomography of Photonic Qudits via Symmetric Informationally Complete Positive Operator-Valued Measures , 2015 .
[42] Christopher A. Fuchs,et al. Group theoretic, lie algebraic and Jordan algebraic formulations of the sic existence problem , 2013, Quantum Inf. Comput..
[43] Miguel Navascués,et al. Bounding the Set of Finite Dimensional Quantum Correlations. , 2014, Physical review letters.
[44] Anna Szymusiak,et al. Informational power of the Hoggar SIC-POVM , 2015, 1512.01735.
[45] Wojciech Słomczyński,et al. Informational power of the Hoggar symmetric informationally complete positive operator-valued measure , 2016 .
[46] Stefano Pironio,et al. Optimal randomness certification from one entangled bit , 2015, 1505.03837.
[47] Marcus Appleby,et al. SICs and Algebraic Number Theory , 2017, 1701.05200.
[48] Christopher A. Fuchs,et al. The SIC Question: History and State of Play , 2017, Axioms.
[49] Experimental device-independent certification of a symmetric, informationally complete, positive operator-valued measure , 2018 .
[50] Robert Fickler,et al. Experimental investigation of high-dimensional quantum key distribution protocols with twisted photons , 2018, Quantum.
[51] Armin Tavakoli,et al. Self-testing quantum states and measurements in the prepare-and-measure scenario , 2018, Physical Review A.
[52] O. Guhne,et al. Enhanced entanglement criterion via symmetric informationally complete measurements , 2018, Physical Review A.
[53] Nicolas Gisin,et al. Entanglement 25 Years after Quantum Teleportation: Testing Joint Measurements in Quantum Networks , 2018, Entropy.
[54] M. Pawłowski,et al. Experimentally feasible semi-device-independent certification of four-outcome positive-operator-valued measurements , 2019, Physical Review A.
[55] Joonwoo Bae,et al. Linking entanglement detection and state tomography via quantum 2-designs , 2018, New Journal of Physics.
[56] Armin Tavakoli,et al. Enabling Computation of Correlation Bounds for Finite-Dimensional Quantum Systems via Symmetrization. , 2018, Physical review letters.
[57] Armin Tavakoli. Semi-Device-Independent Certification of Independent Quantum State and Measurement Devices. , 2020, Physical review letters.
[58] K. Życzkowski,et al. Isoentangled Mutually Unbiased Bases, Symmetric Quantum Measurements, and Mixed-State Designs. , 2019, Physical review letters.
[59] Stockholm University,et al. Experimental device-independent certification of a symmetric, informationally complete, positive operator-valued measure , 2018 .
[60] N. Gisin,et al. The Platonic solids and fundamental tests of quantum mechanics , 2020, Quantum.
[61] Armin Tavakoli,et al. Self-testing nonprojective quantum measurements in prepare-and-measure experiments , 2018, Science Advances.
[62] Tsuyoshi Murata,et al. {m , 1934, ACML.
[63] Armin Tavakoli,et al. Mutually unbiased bases and symmetric informationally complete measurements in Bell experiments , 2019, Science Advances.
[64] P. Alam. ‘A’ , 2021, Composites Engineering: An A–Z Guide.