Stakeholder consultations and opportunities for integrating socio-behavioural factors into the pesticide risk analysis process

The pesticide risk analysis process is well regulated in the EU, especially in relation to placing on the market authorisation procedures, but in order to avoid risks for human health and environment in the use phase, information on how these substances are employed and on socio-behavioural factors that can influence the exposure have to be taken into account. To better explore reasons about the gap between risk assessment and risk management, within the EU FP7 Health and Environmental Risks: Organisation, Integration and Cross-fertilisation of Scientific Knowledge (HEROIC) project, a stepwise stakeholder’s consultation process was developed using a mixed approach in two different phases (survey and roundtable). We elicited stakeholder views regarding factors that could limit the pesticide risk assessment phase linked on how the knowledge is produced and the way the data are used in risk management and in risk communication, also taking into account qualitative factors such as responsibility, trust and behaviours, which could have impact on risk assessment policies. Activities deployed indicate that some changes and interaction are needed to better define the problems at the formulation stage, and the type of information risk assessor has to provide, to better inform risk manager in addressing different societal needs, to strengthen the credibility of the process of risk assessment and improve the effectiveness of policies. Integrations between disciplines may initially increase the complexity but in turn will provide a better and more useful estimation of the risk, reinforce transparency and drive a more efficient use of risk management resources.

[1]  M F Wilks,et al.  White paper on the promotion of an integrated risk assessment concept in European regulatory frameworks for chemicals. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Maura Calliera,et al.  New risk indicator approach for Operators, Workers, Bystanders and Residents for a sustainable use of plant protection products , 2015, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[3]  A Marchis,et al.  Perceptions of pesticides exposure risks by operators, workers, residents and bystanders in Greece, Italy and the UK. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  R. Cooke Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science , 1991 .

[5]  D. Briggs,et al.  A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks , 2008, Environmental health : a global access science source.

[6]  A. Wesselink,et al.  Research impacts and impact on research in biodiversity conservation: The influence of stakeholder engagement , 2012 .

[7]  Gregor Dürrenberger,et al.  Supporting non-experts in judging the credibility of risk assessments (CORA). , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[8]  Harald F Krug,et al.  Evidence Maps: Communicating Risk Assessments in Societal Controversies: The Case of Engineered Nanoparticles , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  Marco Vighi,et al.  SCCP (Scientific Committee on Consumer Products) / SCHER (Scientific Committee on Health& Environment Risks) / SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly- Identified Health Risks) opinion on: Risk assessment methodologies and approaches for genotoxic and carcinogenic substances , 2009 .

[10]  G. Rowe,et al.  A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms , 2005 .

[11]  N. Mack,et al.  Qualitative research methods: a data collectors field guide. , 2005 .

[12]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, trust, and democracy , 1993 .

[13]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The importance of social learning and culture for sustainable water management , 2008 .

[14]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Qualitative Research Methods , 2008 .

[15]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework , 1988 .

[16]  M F Wilks,et al.  Perspectives for integrating human and environmental risk assessment and synergies with socio-economic analysis. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.