User requirements for wearable smart textiles: does the usage context matter (medical vs. sports)?

Wearable smart textiles are a promising approach to provide health related services (e.g., permanent monitoring of vital parameters), and can be used in different context (such as sports or health care). But so far, smart textiles [ST] have not significantly penetrated the market. To identify possible reasons, the acceptance of important stakeholders must be investigated. This paper offers a first step in this direction by presenting a questionnaire study on user requirements of smart wearable textiles. To find out whether there is a generic attitude towards ST, this study is focused on a comparison of user requirements in two settings, sport and health care, as two central fields of application for this technology. First results show that there are differences in the evaluation of requirements of ST pertaining to ease of use, permanent information provision about one's health status, data security as well as the design of such textiles, based on the usage context.

[1]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Technology acceptability for medical assistance , 2010, 2010 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare.

[2]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Acceptance of pervasive healthcare systems: A comparison of different implementation concepts , 2010, 2010 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare.

[3]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[4]  Wan-Young Chung,et al.  Wireless sensor network based wearable smart shirt for ubiquitous health and activity monitoring , 2009 .

[5]  Mandy Scheermesser,et al.  User acceptance of pervasive computing in healthcare: Main findings of two case studies , 2008, Pervasive 2008.

[6]  Marc Langheinrich,et al.  Privacy and trust issues with invisible computers , 2005, CACM.

[7]  Anne Schwarz,et al.  A roadmap on smart textiles , 2010 .

[8]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Technical Expertise and Its Influence on the Acceptance of Future Medical Technologies: What Is Influencing What to Which Extent? , 2010, USAB.

[9]  S. Leonhardt,et al.  Influence of contact pressure and moisture on the signal quality of a newly developed textile ECG sensor shirt , 2008, 2008 5th International Summer School and Symposium on Medical Devices and Biosensors.

[10]  Xin Luo,et al.  Examining multi-dimensional trust and multi-faceted risk in initial acceptance of emerging technologies: An empirical study of mobile banking services , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[11]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[12]  Fred D. Davis.  A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[13]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  Cautionary Note on Reporting Eta-Squared Values from Multifactor ANOVA Designs , 2004 .

[14]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Gender Differences in Acceptance and Attitudes towards an Invasive Medical Stent , 2011 .

[15]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Smart clothing: Perceived benefits vs. perceived fears , 2011, 2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops.

[16]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[17]  Sungmee Park,et al.  Enhancing the quality of life through wearable technology , 2003, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[18]  H Harry Asada,et al.  Mobile monitoring with wearable photoplethysmographic biosensors. , 2003, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[19]  Robert Puers,et al.  Towards the integration of textile sensors in a wireless monitoring suit , 2004 .