This work outlines a cohesive approach for the design and implementation of a genetically optimized, active aeroelastic delta wing. Emphasis was placed on computational efficiency of model development and efficient means for optimizing sensor and actuator geometries. Reduced-order models of potential-flow aerodynamics were developed for facilitation of analysis and design of the aeroelastic system in the early design phase. Using these methods, models capturing 95% of the physics with 8% of the modeling effort can be realized to evaluate various active and passive design considerations. The aeroelastic delta wing model was employed in determining the most effective locations and sizes for transducers required to provide flutter control. The basic design presented is based upon an analytical model of the structure. A comparison of optimization strategies led to the use of a genetic algorithm to determine the optimal transducer locations, sizes, and orientations required to provide effective flutter control based upon an open-loop performance metric. The genetic algorithm and performance metric essentially provided loop shaping through the adaptive structure design. An experimental model was then developed based upon the optimal transducer designs. Wind tunnel tests were performed to demonstrate closed-loop performance for flutter control. Results from this study indicate that a single sensor/actuator pair can be designed to extend the flutter boundary and selectively couple to only those modes reauired to control the response.
[1]
William H. Press,et al.
Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN - The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Edition
,
1987
.
[2]
Singiresu S Rao,et al.
Optimal placement of actuators in actively controlled structures using genetic algorithms
,
1991
.
[3]
Robert L. Clark,et al.
Design of an Aeroelastic Delta Wing Model for Active Flutter Control
,
2001
.
[4]
K B Lim.
A Disturbance Rejection Approach to Actuator and Sensor Placement
,
1997
.
[5]
Seung Jo Kim,et al.
Active Control of Sound Fields from Plates in Flow by Piezoelectric Sensor/Actuator
,
1999
.
[6]
Nesbitt W. Hagood,et al.
Modelling of Piezoelectric Actuator Dynamics for Active Structural Control
,
1990
.
[7]
Robert L. Clark,et al.
Experimental investigation of delta wing active flutter control
,
2000
.
[8]
Stephen J. Elliott,et al.
Natural algorithms for choosing source locations in active control systems
,
1995
.
[9]
Ian Postlethwaite,et al.
Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design
,
1996
.
[10]
David E. Cox,et al.
Band-Limited Actuator and Sensor Selection for Disturbance Rejection
,
1999
.
[11]
K B Lim,et al.
Hankel Singular Values of Flexible Structures in Discrete Time
,
1996
.
[12]
Earl H. Dowell,et al.
LIMIT CYCLE OSCILLATIONS OF DELTA WING MODELS IN LOW SUBSONIC FLOW
,
1999
.