Optimal hybrid Coulomb control for on-track rendezvous and docking of spacecraft

This paper investigates the dynamics of on-track rendezvous and docking of two spacecraft, and stabilization using hybrid Coulomb control. Modeling electrostatic forces and torques for control of complex spacecraft geometries like cylinders is challenging. Point mass assumption of the spacecraft that disregards the chaser dynamics will lead to errors in force estimation during the terminal docking phase, resulting in a mission failure. This paper uses the effective sphere method to model Coulomb interactions between the chaser and the target. The method is coupled with the chaser’s tumbling motion about its body axes to develop a relationship between electrostatic force and attitude. The relative attitude dynamics of the chaser is then derived and incorporated into the system dynamics. Differential gravity and hybrid thrusters are used to stabilize the relative attitude of the two bodies. The charge-voltage relations are used to compute potential variations for the Coulomb control. An optimal linear quadratic tracking control is proposed for tracking a reference trajectory generated using solutions of Clohessy-Wiltshire-Hill’s equations. Numerical simulations are carried out for both non-linear and linear models of the Coulomb spacecraft to validate the proposed concept. Results have also been compared with an existing voltage feedback controller to demonstrate the merits and challenges of electrostatic actuation for rendezvous and docking.

[1]  Changqin Yuan,et al.  Multiple Spacecraft Formation Flying Control around Artificial Equilibrium Point Using Propellantless Approach , 2022, International Journal of Aerospace Engineering.

[2]  Ya-zhong Luo,et al.  Optimization of low-thrust multi-debris removal mission via an efficient approximation model of orbit rendezvous , 2022, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering.

[3]  Yong Zhao,et al.  Distributed attitude consensus tracking control for spacecraft formation flying via adaptive nonsingular fast terminal sliding mode control , 2021, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering.

[4]  Changqin Yuan,et al.  Hybrid propulsion spacecraft formation control around the planetary displaced orbit , 2021, Advances in Mechanical Engineering.

[5]  H. Schaub,et al.  Balancing differential drag with Coulomb repulsion in low earth orbit plasma wakes , 2020 .

[6]  Weiming Feng,et al.  Optimal control of rapid cooperative spacecraft rendezvous with multiple specific-direction thrusts , 2020, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering.

[7]  Junfeng Zhao,et al.  Optimization for far-distance and fuel-limited cooperative rendezvous between two coplanar spacecraft based on Lambert method , 2020 .

[8]  Avinash Kumar,et al.  Linear Quadratic Optimal Control Design: A Novel Approach Based on Krotov Conditions , 2019, Mathematical Problems in Engineering.

[9]  Ye Yan,et al.  Dynamics and control of underactuated spacecraft formation reconfiguration in elliptic orbits , 2018 .

[10]  Firouz Allahverdizadeh,et al.  Robust composite nonlinear feedback control for spacecraft rendezvous systems under parameter uncertainty, external disturbance, and input saturation , 2018, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering.

[11]  Chun Zhang,et al.  Fast trajectory tracking of electromagnetic satellite formation with actuator saturation , 2016 .

[12]  V. V. Sinolits,et al.  Comparison of Coulomb-2, NASCAP-2K, MUSCAT and SPIS codes for geosynchronous spacecraft charging , 2016 .

[13]  G. Ma,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics and reconfiguration control of two-satellite Coulomb tether formation at libration points , 2014 .

[14]  Hanspeter Schaub,et al.  Optimal reconfigurations of two-craft Coulomb formations along manifolds , 2013 .

[15]  H. Schaub,et al.  Relative Motion Control For Two-Spacecraft Electrostatic Orbit Corrections , 2013 .

[16]  W. H. Clohessy,et al.  Terminal Guidance System for Satellite Rendezvous , 2012 .

[17]  H. Schaub,et al.  Optimal Reconfigurations of Two-Craft Coulomb Formation in Circular Orbits , 2010 .

[18]  Islam I. Hussein,et al.  Stability and control of relative equilibria for the three-spacecraft Coulomb tether problem , 2009 .

[19]  Hanspeter Schaub,et al.  Hybrid control of orbit normal and along-track two-craft Coulomb tethers , 2009 .

[20]  Hanspeter Schaub,et al.  Orbit-nadir aligned coulomb tether reconfiguration analysis , 2008 .

[21]  H. Schaub,et al.  Linear Dynamics and Stability Analysis of a Two-Craft Coulomb Tether Formation , 2006 .

[22]  Hanspeter Schaub,et al.  Differential Orbit Element Constraints for Coulomb Satellite Formations , 2004 .

[23]  J. Junkins,et al.  Analytical Mechanics of Space Systems , 2003 .

[24]  G. Parker,et al.  Study of Interspacecraft Coulomb Forces and Implications for Formation Flying , 2003 .

[25]  B. T. Narheim,et al.  Active spacecraft potential control for Cluster - implementation and first results , 2001 .

[26]  Hari B. Hablani,et al.  Guidance Algorithms for Autonomous Rendezvous of Spacecraft with a Target Vehicle in Circular Orbit , 2001 .

[27]  K. Svenes,et al.  Spacecraft potential control aboard Equator-S as a test for Cluster-II , 1999 .

[28]  J. Sliško,et al.  On approximate formulas for the electrostatic force between two conducting spheres , 1998 .

[29]  B. T. Narheim,et al.  Results from active spacecraft potential control on the Geotail spacecraft , 1995 .

[30]  J. A. Soules.  Precise calculation of the electrostatic force between charged spheres including induction effects , 1990 .

[31]  M. S. Gussenhoven,et al.  SCATHA survey of high-level spacecraft charging in sunlight , 1986 .

[32]  Rui Qi,et al.  Coulomb tether double-pyramid formation, a potential configuration for geostationary satellite collocation , 2019, Aerospace Science and Technology.

[33]  Yan Wang,et al.  Finite-time attitude tracking control of air bearing table for spacecraft rendezvous and docking , 2018 .

[34]  Giovanni B. Palmerini,et al.  Three spacecraft formation control by means of electrostatic forces , 2016 .

[35]  H. Schaub,et al.  Multi-Sphere Method for modeling spacecraft electrostatic forces and torques , 2013 .

[36]  V. Davis,et al.  Modeling the charging of geosynchronous and interplanetary spacecraft using Nascap-2k , 2005 .

[37]  G. Hill.  Researches in the Lunar Theory , 1878 .