Critical success factors in S&T policymaking using confirmatory factor analysis and DEMATEL: a case study

Recently, Science and Technology (S&T) policy has risen as critical aspects of economic development. In fact, S&T policy should support adoption and diffusion of countries' competitive technologies for economy and national development. Therefore, policymakers need to indicators that describe the level of adoption and diffusion of these technologies. In this paper by reviewing the literature of the S&T policymaking, i.e. public policy, S&T policymaking process and tools, innovation systems functions, various measures have been generated. Then, the labelled Critical Success Factors (CSFs) consisting of policy-base factor, law and regulation, market, structure, technology and education and learning are validated through a real case study in National Iranian of Oil Refining and Distribution Company (NIORDC). Confirmatory factor analysis and DEMATEL techniques are applied to prove the proposed CSFs.

[1]  Robert Phaal,et al.  Technology roadmapping—A planning framework for evolution and revolution , 2004 .

[2]  Charles Edquist,et al.  The Systems of Innovation Approach and Innovation Policy: An account of the state of the art , 2001 .

[3]  T. Brown,et al.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research , 2006 .

[4]  Arabella Bhutto,et al.  Indicators for science and technology policy in Pakistan: Entering the science, technology and innovation paradigm , 2012 .

[5]  Joseph E. Coombs,et al.  Measuring Technological Capability and Performance , 2006 .

[6]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Competitiveness of Nations: Why Some Countries Prosper While Others Fall Behind , 2007 .

[7]  M Dodgson,et al.  Policies for Science, Technology and Innovation in Asian Newly Industrializing Economies , 2000 .

[8]  Pieter Groenveld Roadmapping Integrates Business and Technology , 1997 .

[9]  M. Bell,et al.  Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts Between Developed and Developing Countries , 1993 .

[10]  Javad Soltanzadeh,et al.  Comparative Analysis for Science, Technology and Innovation Policy; Lessons Learned from Some Selected Countries (Brazil, India, China, South Korea and South Africa) for Other LdCs Like Iran. , 2012 .

[11]  Ruud Smits,et al.  Technology assessment and technology policy in Europe: New concepts, new goals, new infrastructures , 1995 .

[12]  Olga Memedović Public goods for economic development , 2008 .

[13]  Manuel V. Heitor,et al.  The ''swing of the pendulum'' from public to market support for science and technology: Is the U.S. leading the way? , 2004 .

[14]  S. Lall Competitiveness Indices and Developing Countries: An Economic Evaluation of the Global Competitiveness Report , 2001 .

[15]  K. Matthias Weber,et al.  Adaptive Foresight: Navigating the complex landscape of policy strategies , 2008 .

[16]  A. Caparrós,et al.  Emission trading and international competition: The impact of labor market rigidity on technology adoption and output , 2013 .

[17]  D. Archibugi,et al.  Measuring technological capabilities at the country level: A survey and a menu for choice , 2005 .

[18]  S. Lall Structural adjustment and African industry , 1995 .

[19]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The emergence of a growth industry: a comparative analysis of the German, Dutch and Swedish wind turbine industries , 2003 .

[20]  R. Gross,et al.  UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures , 2005 .

[21]  Charles Edquist,et al.  Economic Development and the National System of Innovation Approach , 2003 .

[22]  Osamu Kimura,et al.  Public R&D and commercialization of energy-efficient technology: A case study of Japanese projects , 2010 .

[23]  Hakyeon Lee,et al.  ON THE R&D PRIORITY SETTING IN TECHNOLOGY FORESIGHT: A DEA AND ANP APPROACH , 2008 .

[24]  A. Rip,et al.  The past and future of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .

[25]  R. Goodin,et al.  The Oxford handbook of public policy , 2008 .

[26]  Poh Kam Wong,et al.  From using to creating technology : the evolution of Singapore's national innovation system and the changing role of public policy , 2003 .

[27]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy , 2006 .

[28]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  A value-created system of science (technology) park by using DEMATEL , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  A Guidebook for Technology Assessment and Impact Analysis , 1982 .

[30]  Yoon-Hwan Hahn,et al.  Towards a new technology policy: the integration of generation and diffusion , 1999 .

[31]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change , 2007 .

[32]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis , 2008 .

[33]  Annika Rickne,et al.  New Technology-Based Firms and Industrial Dynamics Evidence from the Technological System of Biomaterials in Sweden, Ohio and Massachusetts , 2000 .

[34]  Scapolo Fabiana,et al.  Future-Oriented Technology Analysis , 2008 .

[35]  R.A.A. Suurs,et al.  Motors of sustainable innovation : Towards a theory on the dynamics of technological innovation systems , 2009 .

[36]  Chris Painter THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF PUBLIC POLICY Michael Moran, Martin Rein and Robert E. Goodin (eds) , 2009 .

[37]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  Technology foresight for wiring up the national innovation system: experiences in Britain, Australia and New Zealand , 1999 .

[38]  P. Ahmed Culture and climate for innovation , 1998 .

[39]  S. Lall,et al.  “Market-stimulating” technology policies in developing countries: A framework with examples from East Asia , 1998 .

[40]  Gerrit Muller,et al.  An architectural framework for roadmapping: Towards visual strategy , 2009 .

[41]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  Evaluation of national foresight activities: Assessing rationale, process and impact , 2006 .

[42]  Borges Gouveia,et al.  Organization, Programme and Structure: An Analysis of the Chinese Innovation Policy Framework , 2004 .

[43]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Measuring the societal impact of research , 2012, EMBO reports.

[44]  Erik Thorbecke,et al.  The Evolution of the Development Doctrine, 1950-2005 , 2006 .

[45]  Tarla Rai Peterson,et al.  Socio-Political Evaluation of Energy Deployment (SPEED): An integrated research framework analyzing energy technology deployment , 2008 .

[46]  Poh Kam Wong,et al.  Leveraging multinational corporations, fostering technopreneurship: the changing role of S&T policy in Singapore , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[47]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Application of technology roadmaps for renewable energy sector , 2010 .

[48]  T. Besley,et al.  Public goods and economic development , 2006 .

[49]  Charles Edquist,et al.  Systems of Innovation Approaches - Their Emergence and Characteristics , 2013 .

[50]  C. Edquist Paradigmatic Shifts in National Innovation Systems , 2013 .

[51]  Chun-Cheng Hsu Analysis of Causal Relationships between Blog Design Criteria , 2011, HCI.

[52]  H. Grupp,et al.  Indicators for national science and technology policy: how robust are composite indicators? , 2004 .

[53]  C. Cagnin,et al.  Positioning Future-Oriented Technology Analysis , 2008 .

[54]  B. Lundvall,et al.  National systems of production, innovation and competence building , 2002 .

[55]  Donald R. Cooper,et al.  Business Research Methods , 1980 .

[56]  Xielin Liu,et al.  Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China’s transitional context , 2001 .

[57]  Yongtae Park,et al.  The state-of-the-art of public-sector technology roadmaps: A taxonomical approach to energy technology roadmaps , 2013 .

[58]  Poh Kam Wong,et al.  Competing at the Frontier: The Changing Role of Technology Policy in Singapore's Economic Strategy , 2003 .

[59]  Thomas A. Birkland,et al.  An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts and Models of Public Policy Making , 2001 .

[60]  Sepehr Ghazinoory,et al.  Developing Iran’s government strategies for strengthening the national system of innovation using SWOT analysis , 2006 .

[61]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Moderation of Policy-Making? , 1998 .

[62]  Jeffrey Johnson,et al.  Science and policy in designing complex futures , 2008 .

[63]  R. Buchholz Essentials of Public Policy for Management , 1985 .

[64]  Hariolf Grupp,et al.  National Technology Foresight Activities Around the Globe , 1999 .

[65]  Marieke Kleiboer,et al.  Policy controversies in the negotiatory state , 1995 .

[66]  Philip Shapira,et al.  Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation: Experiences from the United States and Europe , 2003 .

[67]  C. Freeman The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective , 1995 .

[68]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development , 2008 .

[69]  Gento Mogi,et al.  Energy technology roadmap for the next 10 years : The case of Korea , 2009 .

[70]  C. Edquist,et al.  Systems of Innovation : Theory and Policy for the Demand Side , 1999 .

[71]  Ha-Joon Chang,et al.  Rethinking development economics , 2003 .