Factors associated with publication speed in general medical journals: a retrospective study of bibliometric data

We aimed to assess publication speed of manuscripts submitted to general medical journals and to explore the link with various author, paper and journal characteristics. In this retrospective study of bibliometric data we retrieved 45 randomly selected papers published in 2016 from each of the highest impact factor journals of general internal medicine (n = 9) and primary care (n = 9). Only journals reporting submission and publication dates were included. The following data were extracted: first author (gender, place of affiliation, number of publications), paper (submission and publication dates, online publication, open access, number of authors, number of participants, study design, study results) and journal characteristics (impact factor, number of papers published). We computed for each paper the submission-to-acceptance, acceptance-to-publication and submission-to-publication times. We performed linear regression with random effects models to identify the associations with predictors, adjusting for intra-cluster correlations. A total of 781 papers were included. The overall median submission-to-acceptance time was 123 days (interquartile range 111, min 1, max 922), acceptance-to-publication time 68 days (interquartile range 88, min 2, max 802) and submission-to-publication time 224 days (interquartile range 156, min 24, max 1034). In multivariate analysis, online publication was strongly associated with reduced submission-to-publication time (difference: − 93 days, p value < 0.001). This study provides insight into the submission-to-acceptance, acceptance-to-publication and submission-to-publication times in general medical journals. Researchers interested in reducing publication delays should focus on journals with online publication.

[1]  Ewen Callaway,et al.  Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric , 2016, Nature.

[2]  I. Hozo,et al.  Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample , 2005, BMC medical research methodology.

[3]  Peng Dong,et al.  Publication lag in biomedical journals varies due to the periodical's publishing model , 2006, Scientometrics.

[4]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Publication Speed in Analytical Chemistry Journals , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[5]  Bo-Christer Björk,et al.  Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  M. Kalcıoğlu,et al.  Research on the Submission, Acceptance and Publication Times of Articles Submitted to International Otorhinolaryngology Journals , 2015, Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH.

[7]  Carlos B. Amat,et al.  Editorial and publication delay of papers submitted to 14 selected Food Research journals. Influence of online posting , 2008, Scientometrics.

[8]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Non-publication and delayed publication of randomized trials on vaccines: survey , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  S. Salinas,et al.  Where Should I Send It? Optimizing the Submission Decision Process , 2015, PloS one.

[11]  D. Ruths,et al.  Flows of Research Manuscripts Among Scientific Journals Reveal Hidden Submission Patterns , 2012, Science.

[12]  Larry Peiperl,et al.  Preprints in medical research: Progress and principles , 2018, PLoS medicine.

[13]  Mitchell H. Katz,et al.  Multivariable Analysis: A Practical Guide for Clinicians , 1999 .

[14]  Louise Hall,et al.  Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  K. Reuter Writing and Publishing in Medicine, 3rd Ed. , 2001 .

[16]  Anup Bhat,et al.  Publication speed and advanced online publication: Are biomedical Indian journals slow? , 2016, Perspectives in clinical research.

[17]  M. Kleinpeter Multivariable Analysis: A Practical Guide for Clinicians, 2nd edition edited by Katz, M. H. Study Design and Statistical Analysis: A Practical Guide for Clinicians edited by Katz, M. H. , 2007 .

[18]  Luke Oakden-Rayner,et al.  Medical journals should embrace preprints to address the reproducibility crisis. , 2018, International journal of epidemiology.

[19]  C. Hewitt,et al.  No difference found in time to publication by statistical significance of trial results: a methodological review , 2016, JRSM open.

[20]  V. Jhanji,et al.  Publication times, impact factors, and advance online publication in ophthalmology journals. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[21]  Michelle L Gagnon,et al.  Moving knowledge to action through dissemination and exchange. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  A. Palese,et al.  Publication efficiency among the higher impact factor nursing journals in 2009: a retrospective analysis. , 2013, International journal of nursing studies.

[23]  Bo-Christer Björk,et al.  The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[24]  O. Buckley,et al.  Does online submission of manuscripts improve efficiency? , 2008, JBR-BTR : organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie.

[25]  K. Dickersin,et al.  Publication bias in clinical trials , 2007 .

[26]  Edward J. Huth,et al.  Writing and Publishing in Medicine , 1999 .

[27]  L. Stewart,et al.  Time to publication for results of clinical trials. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[28]  N. Mohaghegh,et al.  WHY THE IMPACT FACTOR OF JOURNALS SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR EVALUATING RESEARCH , 2005 .

[29]  Françoise Chanut Interphase Chromosomes Mingle with Their Peers , 2006, PLoS biology.