Global sensitivity analysis for models with spatially dependent outputs

The global sensitivity analysis of a complex numerical model often calls for the estimation of variance-based importance measures, named Sobol' indices. Metamodel-based techniques have been developed in order to replace the cpu time-expensive computer code with an inexpensive mathematical function, which predicts the computer code output. The common metamodel-based sensitivity analysis methods are well-suited for computer codes with scalar outputs. However, in the environmental domain, as in many areas of application, the numerical model outputs are often spatial maps, which may also vary with time. In this paper, we introduce an innovative method to obtain a spatial map of Sobol' indices with a minimal number of numerical model computations. It is based upon the functional decomposition of the spatial output onto a wavelet basis and the metamodeling of the wavelet coefficients by the Gaussian process. An analytical example is presented to clarify the various steps of our methodology. This technique is then applied to a real hydrogeological case: for each model input variable, a spatial map of Sobol' indices is thus obtained.

[1]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[2]  Douglas W. Nychka,et al.  Case Studies in Environmental Statistics , 1998 .

[3]  Amandine Marrel Mise en oeuvre et utilisation du métamodèle processus gaussien pour l'analyse de sensibilité de modèles numériques : application à un code de transport hydrogéologique , 2008 .

[4]  J Q Shi,et al.  Gaussian Process Functional Regression Modeling for Batch Data , 2007, Biometrics.

[5]  Matieyendou Lamboni,et al.  Multivariate global sensitivity analysis for dynamic crop models , 2009 .

[6]  M. D. Ruiz-Medina,et al.  Wavelet-vaguelette decomposition of spatiotemporal random fields , 2006 .

[7]  D. Shahsavani,et al.  Variance-based sensitivity analysis of model outputs using surrogate models , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[8]  Bertrand Iooss,et al.  An efficient methodology for modeling complex computer codes with Gaussian processes , 2008, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[9]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Uncertainty in Industrial Practice , 2008 .

[10]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models , 1993 .

[11]  Brian J. Williams,et al.  Sensitivity analysis when model outputs are functions , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  D. Higdon,et al.  Computer Model Calibration Using High-Dimensional Output , 2008 .

[13]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices , 2002 .

[14]  M. J. Bayarri,et al.  Computer model validation with functional output , 2007, 0711.3271.

[15]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models , 1996 .

[16]  P. C. Gehlen,et al.  Computer Experiments , 1996 .

[17]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Bayesian approach , 2004 .

[18]  B. Iooss,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis for a numerical model of radionuclide migration from the RRC “Kurchatov Institute” radwaste disposal site , 2008 .

[19]  Runze Li,et al.  Design and Modeling for Computer Experiments , 2005 .

[20]  T. Simpson,et al.  Use of Kriging Models to Approximate Deterministic Computer Models , 2005 .

[21]  Joseph A. C. Delaney Sensitivity analysis , 2018, The African Continental Free Trade Area: Economic and Distributional Effects.

[22]  N. N. Ponomarev-Stepnoi,et al.  Rehabilitation of the radioactively contaminated objects and territory of the Russian Science Center Kurchatov Institute , 2007 .

[23]  Bertrand Iooss,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis of computer models with functional inputs , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2003, Springer Series in Statistics.

[25]  Andrea P. Reverberi,et al.  Statistical sensitivity analysis of packed column reactors for contaminated wastewater , 2003 .

[26]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of spatial models , 2009, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[27]  B. Silverman,et al.  Wavelet decomposition approaches to statistical inverse problems , 1998 .

[28]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  B. Efron,et al.  The Jackknife Estimate of Variance , 1981 .

[30]  Bertrand Iooss,et al.  Numerical studies of the metamodel fitting and validation processes , 2010, 1001.1049.

[31]  B. Silverman,et al.  The vaguelette-wavelet decomposition approaches to statistical inverse problems , 1997 .

[32]  Sonja Kuhnt,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 2010 .

[33]  Jennifer A Hoeting,et al.  Model selection for geostatistical models. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[34]  Henry P. Wynn,et al.  Screening, predicting, and computer experiments , 1992 .

[35]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[36]  Jeremy E. Oakley,et al.  Bayesian Inference for the Uncertainty Distribution , 2000 .

[37]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal , 1993 .

[38]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian inference for the uncertainty distribution of computer model outputs , 2002 .

[39]  Olivier Roustant,et al.  Calculations of Sobol indices for the Gaussian process metamodel , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[40]  J. Chilès,et al.  Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty , 1999 .