Multi-signal compressed sensing for polarimetric SAR tomography

In recent years, three-dimensional imaging by means of SAR tomography has become a field of intensive research. In SAR tomography, the vertical reflectivity function for every azimuth-range pixel is usually recovered by processing data collected using a defined repeat pass acquisition geometry. The most common approach is to generate a synthetic aperture in the elevation direction through imaging from a large number of parallel tracks. This imaging technique is appealing, since it is very simple. However, it has the drawback that large temporal baselines, which is the case for space-borne platforms, can severely affect the reconstruction. In an attempt to reduce the number of parallel tracks, we propose a new tomographic focusing approach that trades number of SAR images for correlations between neighboring azimuth-range pixels and polarimetric channels. As a matter of fact, this can be done under the framework of Distributed Compressed Sensing (DCS), which stems from Compressed Sensing (CS) theory, thus also exploiting sparsity in our tomographic signal. In addition, we address the problem of measurements affected by additive as well as multiplicative speckle noise. Results demonstrating the potential of the DCS methodology will be validated by using fully polarimetric L-band data acquired by the E-SAR sensor of DLR.

[1]  Stefano Tebaldini,et al.  Algebraic Synthesis of Forest Scenarios From Multibaseline PolInSAR Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  E.J. Candes Compressive Sampling , 2022 .

[3]  Richard Bamler,et al.  Super-Resolution Power and Robustness of Compressive Sensing for Spectral Estimation With Application to Spaceborne Tomographic SAR , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Distributed Compressive Sensing , 2009, ArXiv.

[5]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Robust Recovery of Signals From a Structured Union of Subspaces , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[6]  R.G. Baraniuk,et al.  Compressive Sensing [Lecture Notes] , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[7]  Richard Bamler,et al.  Tomographic SAR Inversion by $L_{1}$ -Norm Regularization—The Compressive Sensing Approach , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Alberto Moreira,et al.  Estimation of the Minimum Number of Tracks for SAR Tomography , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[10]  Jie Chen,et al.  Theoretical Results on Sparse Representations of Multiple-Measurement Vectors , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[12]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Decoding by linear programming , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[13]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[14]  E. Candès The restricted isometry property and its implications for compressed sensing , 2008 .

[15]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Average Case Analysis of Multichannel Sparse Recovery Using Convex Relaxation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  Dmitry M. Malioutov,et al.  A sparse signal reconstruction perspective for source localization with sensor arrays , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[17]  Gilda Schirinzi,et al.  Three-Dimensional SAR Focusing From Multipass Signals Using Compressive Sampling , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[18]  M. Rudelson,et al.  On sparse reconstruction from Fourier and Gaussian measurements , 2008 .

[19]  Alberto Moreira,et al.  First demonstration of airborne SAR tomography using multibaseline L-band data , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..