Receptive Field Characteristics That Allow Parietal Lobe Neurons to Encode Spatial Properties of Visual Input: A Computational Analysis

A subset of visually sensitive neurons in the parietal lobe apparently can encode the locations of stimuli, whereas visually sensitive neurons in the inferotemporal cortex (area IT) cannot. This finding is puzzling because both sorts of neurons have large receptive fields, and yet location can be encoded in one case, but not in the other. The experiments reported here investigated the hypothesis that a crucial difference between the IT and parietal neurons is the spatial distribution of their response profiles. In particular, IT neurons typically respond maximally when stimuli are presented at the fovea, whereas parietal neurons do not. We found that a parallel-distributed-processing network could map a point in an array to a coordinate representation more easily when a greater proportion of its input units had response peaks off the center of the input array. Furthermore, this result did not depend on potentially implausible assumptions about the regularity of the overlap in receptive fields or the homogeneity of the response profiles of different units. Finally, the internal representations formed within the network had receptive fields resembling those found in area 7a of the parietal lobe.

[1]  B. C. Motter,et al.  The functional properties of the light-sensitive neurons of the posterior parietal cortex studied in waking monkeys: foveal sparing and opponent vector organization , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  R. Desimone,et al.  Visual areas in the temporal cortex of the macaque , 1979, Brain Research.

[3]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. , 1987, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the Macaque. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Contour, color and shape analysis beyond the striate cortex , 1985, Vision Research.

[6]  C. Gross 7 – The Neural Basis of Stimulus Equivalence Across Retinal Translation , 1977 .

[7]  Dana H. Ballard,et al.  Cortical connections and parallel processing: Structure and function , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  R. M. Siegel,et al.  Corticocortical connections of anatomically and physiologically defined subdivisions within the inferior parietal lobule , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Neural Network Model for the Cortical Representation of Surface Curvature from Images of Shaded Surfaces , 1988 .

[10]  R. Andersen,et al.  The role of the posterior parietal cortex in coordinate transformations for visual-motor integration. , 1988, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[11]  Richard A. Andersen,et al.  A back-propagation programmed network that simulates response properties of a subset of posterior parietal neurons , 1988, Nature.

[12]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Distributed Representations , 1986, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[13]  Richard A. Andersen,et al.  Value, variable, and coarse coding by posterior parietal neurons , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  B. C. Motter,et al.  Functional properties of parietal visual neurons: mechanisms of directionality along a single axis , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Contribution of striate inputs to the visuospatial functions of parieto-preoccipital cortex in monkeys , 1982, Behavioural Brain Research.

[16]  D. Ts'o,et al.  Functional organization of primate visual cortex revealed by high resolution optical imaging. , 1990, Science.

[17]  R. M. Siegel,et al.  Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons. , 1985, Science.

[18]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[19]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[20]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[21]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Why are What and Where Processed by Separate Cortical Visual Systems? A Computational Investigation , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Network model of shape-from-shading: neural function arises from both receptive and projective fields , 1988, Nature.