Methods to compare the spatial variability of UAV-based spectral and geometric information with ground autocorrelated data. A case of study for precision viticulture

Abstract One of the key steps that would lead winegrowers to implement precision viticulture as a management tool would be the clear demonstration of the agronomic and oenological significance of the zones delineated within a vineyard based, totally or partially, on remote-acquired information. To perform this analysis, it is necessary to compare image-derived variables to crop characteristics. Classical ordinary least square (OLS) regression is not well suit for spatially structured data, while Moran’s index (MI) and local indicators of spatial autocorrelation (LISA) take autocorrelation into account. The aim of this work was to evaluate the performance of statistical methods to compare different maps of a vineyard, some including variables derived from UAV acquired imagery, and some from in situ ground characterization. The study was conducted during 2015 and 2016 seasons in an adult 7.5 ha cv. ‘Tempranillo’ vineyard located in Traibuenas, Navarra, Spain. The maps obtained out of UAV-imagery, volume index (VI) and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) were compared to the maps obtained for the agronomic variables measured (yield, berry weight and total soluble solids). The bivariate MI and the bivariate LISA cluster map obtained using Geoda software indicate depict the spatial cluster association between variables in 2015 and 2016 with different types of local spatial autocorrelation. The use of these methods that take into account data spatial structure, to compare ground autocorrelated data and spectral and geometric information derived from UAV-acquired imagery has been proved to be highly necessary and advisable.

[1]  B. Tisseyre,et al.  Oenological significance of vineyard management zones delineated using early grape sampling , 2013, Precision Agriculture.

[2]  Potira Meirelles Hermuche,et al.  Spatial-Temporal Patterns of Bean Crop in Brazil over the Period 1990-2013 , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[3]  B. Tisseyre,et al.  Relevance of sink-size estimation for within-field zone delineation in vineyards , 2017, Precision Agriculture.

[4]  Andrea Berton,et al.  Assessment of a canopy height model (CHM) in a vineyard using UAV-based multispectral imaging , 2017 .

[5]  Piero Toscano,et al.  Intercomparison of UAV, Aircraft and Satellite Remote Sensing Platforms for Precision Viticulture , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[6]  A discussion on the significance associated with Pearson’s correlation in precision agriculture studies , 2013, Precision Agriculture.

[7]  B. Tisseyre,et al.  Use of multi-spectral airborne imagery to improve yield sampling in viticulture , 2015, Precision Agriculture.

[8]  Youngihn Kho,et al.  GeoDa: An Introduction to Spatial Data Analysis , 2006 .

[9]  H. Nagendra,et al.  Land cover change and landscape fragmentation—comparing the utility of continuous and discrete analyses for a western Honduras region , 2004 .

[10]  André Schneider,et al.  Spatial variability of potassium in agricultural soils of the canton of Fribourg, Switzerland , 2017 .

[11]  Chenghai Yang,et al.  Using spectral distance, spectral angle and plant abundance derived from hyperspectral imagery to characterize crop yield variation , 2012, Precision Agriculture.

[12]  David W. Lamb,et al.  Within-season temporal variation in correlations between vineyard canopy and winegrape composition and yield , 2011, Precision Agriculture.

[13]  Manfred F. Buchroithner,et al.  Spatiotemporal drought evaluation of Hyrcanian deciduous forests and semi‐steppe rangelands using moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer time series in Northeast Iran , 2018, Land Degradation & Development.

[14]  L. Anselin.  Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA , 2010 .

[15]  J. Arnó,et al.  Review. Precision Viticulture. Research topics, challenges and opportunities in site-specific vineyard management , 2009 .

[16]  V. Freitas,et al.  Influence of the heterogeneity of grape phenolic maturity on wine composition and quality , 2011 .

[17]  J. Tardaguila,et al.  Assessment of the spatial variability of anthocyanins in grapes using a fluorescence sensor: relationships with vine vigour and yield , 2012, Precision Agriculture.

[18]  L. Anselin,et al.  Modern Spatial Econometrics in Practice: A Guide to GeoDa, GeoDaSpace and PySAL , 2014 .

[19]  L. Johnson.  Temporal stability of an NDVI-LAI relationship in a Napa Valley vineyard , 2003 .

[20]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Sensor Correction of a 6-Band Multispectral Imaging Sensor for UAV Remote Sensing , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[21]  B. Tisseyre,et al.  Are precision agriculture tools and methods relevant at the whole-vineyard scale? , 2013, Precision Agriculture.

[22]  P. Moran.  Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. , 1950, Biometrika.