Scaling laws for gas–liquid flow in swirl vane separators

Abstract Laboratory tests on gas–liquid flow in swirl vane separators are usually carried out to help establish an experimental database for separator design and performance improvement. Such model tests are generally performed in the reduced scale and not on the actual working conditions. Though great efficiency is often obtainable in the reduced model, the performance of the full-sized prototype usually cannot be well predicted. To design downscale model tests and apply the experimental results to predict the prototype, a general relationship to correlate them is required. In this paper, the relation of the similitude-criterion concerning the pressure loss is presented by using the dimensionless analysis, and mathematical models for critical droplet diameter, grade efficiency and overall separation efficiency are established by analyzing the features of the droplet trajectory in gas swirling flow field. The essential similarity criteria accounting for pressure loss and separation efficiency are obtained, respectively. On this basis, the scaling laws which enable a comparison between the reduced model and the full-sized prototype under similar conditions are also developed. It is found that the overall separation efficiency is significantly affected by the size distribution of the small droplets, especially when the mean diameter is smaller than the critical droplet diameter.

[1]  R. Clift,et al.  Bubbles, Drops, and Particles , 1978 .

[2]  A. Tomiyama,et al.  Effects of swirler shape on swirling annular flow in a gas–liquid separator , 2012 .

[3]  W. Licht,et al.  Air pollution control engineering: Basic calculations for particulate collection , 1980 .

[4]  S. J. Green,et al.  PWR steam generators , 1995 .

[5]  David Leith,et al.  Collection efficiency and pressure drop for a rotary-flow cyclone , 1994 .

[6]  A. Kebriaee,et al.  Simulation of turbulent swirling flow in convergent nozzles , 2012 .

[7]  C. Verlaan,et al.  Performance of novel mist eliminators , 1991 .

[8]  Xu Cheng,et al.  Study on flow pattern and separation performance of air–water swirl-vane separator , 2014 .

[9]  Andrew D. Maynard,et al.  A simple model of axial flow cyclone performance under laminar flow conditions , 2000 .

[10]  Trond Austrheim,et al.  Experimental Characterization of High-Pressure Natural Gas Scrubbers , 2006 .

[11]  A. Tomiyama,et al.  Effects of Swirler Shape on Two-Phase Swirling Flow in a Steam Separator , 2009 .

[12]  Nikolay Ivanov Kolev Multiphase Flow Dynamics 1 , 2002 .

[13]  Frans T. M. Nieuwstadt,et al.  A fluid mechanics model for an axial cyclone separator , 1995 .

[14]  Alex C. Hoffmann,et al.  Gas Cyclones and Swirl Tubes: Principles, Design, and Operation , 2007 .

[15]  A. Tomiyama,et al.  Swirling Annular Flow in a Steam Separator , 2009 .

[16]  A. Tomiyama,et al.  Two-Phase Swirling Flow in a Gas-Liquid Separator , 2008 .

[17]  A. Tomiyama,et al.  Pressure Drop in Two-Phase Swirling Flow in a Steam Separator , 2009 .

[18]  H. Schlichting Boundary Layer Theory , 1955 .

[19]  T. Fukuda,et al.  Improvement of BWR steam separator with three-dimensional gas-liquid two-phase flow simulation method , 2003 .

[20]  G. Hetsroni,et al.  Improved Italian moisture separators (IIMS) , 1990 .

[21]  Kimitoshi Yoneda,et al.  Flow structure and bubble characteristics of steam–water two-phase flow in a large-diameter pipe , 2002 .

[22]  R. Maddahian,et al.  Turbulent flow in converging nozzles, part one: boundary layer solution , 2011 .

[23]  Alessandro Paglianti,et al.  Simplified design of axial‐flow cyclone mist eliminators , 2003 .

[24]  G. Taylor,et al.  THE BOUNDARY LAYER IN THE CONVERGING NOZZLE OF A SWIRL ATOMIZER , 1950 .

[25]  Mohammad Hassan Saidi,et al.  Boundary Layer Solution for the Turbulent Swirling Decay Flow Through a Fixed Pipe: SBR at the Inlet , 2003 .