Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields.

We present a set of evolving guidelines for reviewing qualitative research, to serve four functions: to contribute to the process of legitimizing qualitative research; to ensure more appropriate and valid scientific reviews of qualitative manuscripts, theses, and dissertations; to encourage better quality control in qualitative research through better self- and other-monitoring; and to encourage further developments in approach and method. Building on a review of existing principles of good practice in qualitative research, we used an iterative process of revision and feedback from colleagues who engage in qualitative research, resulting in a set of seven guidelines common to both qualitative and quantitative research and seven guidelines especially pertinent to qualitative investigations in psychology and related social sciences. The Evolving Guidelines are subject to continuing revision and should not be used in a rigid manner, in order to avoid stifling creativity in this rapidly evolving, rich research tradition.

[1]  D. W. Hamlyn.  Theory of Knowledge , 1971 .

[2]  C. Fischer.  Historical relations of psychology as an object-science and a subject-science: toward psychology as a human science. , 1977, Journal of the history of the behavioral sciences.

[3]  C. Fischer,et al.  Empirical Phenomenological Analyses of Being Criminally Victimized , 1979 .

[4]  M. Miles,et al.  Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared Craft , 1984 .

[5]  Eric Matthews,et al.  Methodology for the Human Sciences , 1985 .

[6]  Linda S. Lotto.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[7]  The Question of the Reliability of Psychological Research , 1986 .

[8]  H. Huntley,et al.  The Social Reconstruction of Sexual Assault by Women Victims: A Comparison of Therapeutic Experiences , 1986 .

[9]  John K. Smith,et al.  Closing Down the Conversation: The End of the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate Among Educational Inquirers , 1986 .

[10]  P. Brink.  On reliability and validity in qualitative research. , 1987, Western journal of nursing research.

[11]  Validity and Reliability from a Phenomenological Perspective , 1988 .

[12]  D. Rennie,et al.  Grounded theory: A promising approach to conceptualization in psychology? , 1988 .

[13]  E. Mishler.  Validation in Inquiry-Guided Research: The Role of Exemplars in Narrative Studies , 1990 .

[14]  M. Patton.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[15]  A. Giorgi,et al.  Phenomenology and Psychological Research , 1991 .

[16]  J. Durlak,et al.  A practitioner's guide to meta-analysis , 1991, American journal of community psychology.

[17]  Tom Carney.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1991 .

[18]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[19]  W. Stiles.  Quality control in qualitative research , 1993 .

[20]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[21]  David L. Altheide,et al.  Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[22]  A. Kazdin.  Methodology, design, and evaluation in psychotherapy research. , 1994 .

[23]  D. Rennie.  On the rhetorics of social science: Let's not conflate natural science and human science , 1995 .

[24]  Jonathan Potter,et al.  Discourse analysis and constructionist approaches: theoretical background , 1996 .

[25]  T. V. Dijk,et al.  Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Volume 2. , 1997 .

[26]  Lois W. Sayrs.  Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .