Experimenting with Law and Governance for Decentralized Electricity Systems: Adjusting Regulation to Reality?

Moving towards a low-carbon society calls not only for technological innovation, but also for new modes of governance. However, the current legal framework of the electricity sector, and the modes of governance that it establishes, impede innovation in the sector. To overcome this obstacle, in 2015 the Dutch government adopted a Crown decree for experiments with decentralized renewable electricity generation (Experimentation Decree) with the aim to generate insights on how to adjust the legal framework. The question remains whether regulation is being adopted to real-life settings, i.e., which lessons can be learned from experimentally acquired results regarding new modes of governance for decentralized electricity systems? To answer this question we apply an interdisciplinary approach: we investigate which modes of governance are established in the Experimentation Decree (legal research) and which ones are implemented in nine projects (governance research). Under the Decree, associations have to carry out all tasks in the electricity supply chain and can engage in collective generation, peer-to-peer supply and system operation. Other modes of governance, new actors for emerging activities and consumer involvement are limited. We conclude that the Experimentation Decree is too restricted regarding new modes of governance for a decentralized electricity system in real-life settings.

[1]  Edeltraud Guenther,et al.  What Hampers Energy System Transformations? The Case of Smart Grids , 2014 .

[2]  Sofia Ranchordás,et al.  Constitutional Sunsets and Experimental Legislation: A Comparative Perspective , 2014 .

[3]  Ruggero Schleicher-Tappeser,et al.  How renewables will change electricity markets in the next five years , 2012 .

[4]  Elke Klaassen,et al.  Sharing lessons learned on developing and operating Smart Grid pilots with households , 2013, IEEE PES ISGT Europe 2013.

[5]  J. G. Slootweg,et al.  Impact of future residential loads on medium voltage networks , 2011 .

[6]  S. Pront-van Bommel,et al.  Smart grid pilots: handvatten voor toepassing van wet- en regelgeving. - Dl. 1: Praktisch overzicht naar aanleiding van praktijkvragen , 2011 .

[7]  A. J. van der Welle,et al.  Increasing penetration of renewable and distributed electricity generation and the need for different network regulation , 2009 .

[8]  Dierk Bauknecht,et al.  Typology of centralised and decentralised visions for electricity infrastructure , 2016 .

[9]  Benjamin Sovacool,et al.  Electricity market design for the prosumer era , 2016, Nature Energy.

[10]  M. Heldeweg.  Legal regimes for experimenting with cleaner production – Especially in sustainable energy , 2017 .

[11]  Martin Braun,et al.  A REVIEW ON AGGREGATION APPROACHES OF CONTROLLABLE DISTRIBUTED ENERGY UNITS IN ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS , 2008 .

[12]  Maria Lorena Tuballa,et al.  A review of the development of Smart Grid technologies , 2016 .

[13]  Imke Lammers,et al.  Polycentrisme in lokale besluitvorming over duurzame energie: de casus slimme netten , 2016 .

[14]  Sandra Bellekom,et al.  Power to the people: local energy initiatives as seedbeds of innovation? , 2014, Energy, Sustainability and Society.

[15]  Vanessa Johnston.  Moving towards a low carbon economy in Australia - a taxing question? a comparison of tax laws that affect the cost of road transport activities in Australia and Germany , 2016 .

[16]  Gerard J. M. Smit,et al.  Value of Storage in Distribution Grids—Competition or Cooperation of Stakeholders? , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[17]  Pieter Valkering,et al.  Fostering Residential Demand Response through Dynamic Pricing Schemes: A Behavioural Review of Smart Grid Pilots in Europe , 2016 .

[18]  G. Fulli,et al.  A business case for Smart Grid technologies: A systemic perspective , 2011 .

[19]  M. Pollitt,et al.  Electricity Market Reform in the European Union: Review of Progress toward Liberalization &Integration* , 2005 .

[20]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Social implications of residential demand response in cool temperate climates , 2012 .

[21]  N. Friedrichsen,et al.  Roles and responsibilities in smart grids: A country comparison , 2012, 2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market.

[22]  G. Brunekreeft,et al.  The need for more flexibility in the regulation of smart grids – stakeholder involvement , 2014 .

[23]  Sofia Ranchordás,et al.  The Whys and Woes of Experimental Legislation , 2013 .

[24]  M. Saguan,et al.  The electricity generation adequacy problem: Assessing dynamic effects of capacity remuneration mechanisms , 2016 .

[25]  T. Hoppe,et al.  Presenting a Framework to Analyze Local Climate Policy and Action in Small and Medium-Sized Cities , 2016 .

[26]  Experimental legislation concerning technological & governance innovation – an analytical approach , 2015 .

[27]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Centralised and distributed electricity systems , 2008 .

[28]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Adoption of smart grid technologies: An analysis of interactions among barriers , 2014 .

[29]  G. Verbong,et al.  Smart grids or smart users? Involving users in developing a low carbon electricity economy , 2013 .

[30]  I. Lammers,et al.  Local Governments Supporting Local Energy Initiatives: Lessons from the Best Practices of Saerbeck (Germany) and Lochem (The Netherlands) , 2015 .

[31]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Smart grids, smart users? The role of the user in demand side management , 2014 .

[32]  Matthias Wissner,et al.  The Smart Grid – A saucerful of secrets? , 2011 .

[33]  Madeleine Gibescu,et al.  Scenario-based modelling of future residential electricity demands and assessing their impact on distribution grids , 2013 .

[34]  Ijeoma Onyeji,et al.  Consumer engagement: An insight from smart grid projects in Europe , 2013 .